小说:20世纪60年代至今

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN American Literary Scholarship Pub Date : 2015-10-07 DOI:10.1215/00659142-2000-1-333
Jerome Klinkowitz
{"title":"小说:20世纪60年代至今","authors":"Jerome Klinkowitz","doi":"10.1215/00659142-2000-1-333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1955, when Robert E. Spiller’s The Cycle of American Literature argued for the figural and historical typologies that help organize American Literary Scholarship and most other surveys, the period covered by this chapter had not even begun. Now, 58 years later, its parameters equal that of other eras. But does any reliable typification fit this latest epoch in the cavalcade of American letters? Has postmodernism arisen only to quickly fall? Has deconstruction undermined the critic’s ability to totalize? Perhaps these very instabilities are the most apt characterization of literary activity during the past six decades. At the very least, a spirit of debate has characterized the best scholarship of fiction written throughout these years.","PeriodicalId":40078,"journal":{"name":"American Literary Scholarship","volume":"2013 1","pages":"311 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiction: The 1960s to the Present\",\"authors\":\"Jerome Klinkowitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00659142-2000-1-333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1955, when Robert E. Spiller’s The Cycle of American Literature argued for the figural and historical typologies that help organize American Literary Scholarship and most other surveys, the period covered by this chapter had not even begun. Now, 58 years later, its parameters equal that of other eras. But does any reliable typification fit this latest epoch in the cavalcade of American letters? Has postmodernism arisen only to quickly fall? Has deconstruction undermined the critic’s ability to totalize? Perhaps these very instabilities are the most apt characterization of literary activity during the past six decades. At the very least, a spirit of debate has characterized the best scholarship of fiction written throughout these years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Literary Scholarship\",\"volume\":\"2013 1\",\"pages\":\"311 - 342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Literary Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00659142-2000-1-333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Literary Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00659142-2000-1-333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1955年,当罗伯特·e·斯皮勒(Robert E. Spiller)的《美国文学循环》(The Cycle of American Literature)主张人物和历史类型学有助于组织美国文学研究和大多数其他调查时,本章所涵盖的时期甚至还没有开始。58年后的今天,它的参数与其他时代相同。但是,有可靠的类型化适用于这个最新时代的美国文学吗?后现代主义的兴起是否只是为了迅速衰落?解构主义是否削弱了批评家的综合能力?也许正是这些不稳定性,最恰当地描述了过去60年的文学活动。至少,辩论精神是这些年来最优秀的小说学术作品的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fiction: The 1960s to the Present
In 1955, when Robert E. Spiller’s The Cycle of American Literature argued for the figural and historical typologies that help organize American Literary Scholarship and most other surveys, the period covered by this chapter had not even begun. Now, 58 years later, its parameters equal that of other eras. But does any reliable typification fit this latest epoch in the cavalcade of American letters? Has postmodernism arisen only to quickly fall? Has deconstruction undermined the critic’s ability to totalize? Perhaps these very instabilities are the most apt characterization of literary activity during the past six decades. At the very least, a spirit of debate has characterized the best scholarship of fiction written throughout these years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Literary Scholarship
American Literary Scholarship LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: American Literary Scholarship features bibliographic essays arranged by writer and time period, from pre-1800 to the present, and acts as a “systematic evaluative guide to current published studies of American literature” (ALA Booklist). Each volume of American Literary Scholarship covers content from two years previous to the volume.
期刊最新文献
Henry James Faulkner Fiction: The 1960s to the 1980s Literature to 1800 Emerson, Thoreau, Fuller, and Transcendentalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1