钢筋间距对抛物冲击下混凝土板性能的影响

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structural Engineering and Mechanics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.12989/SEM.2021.77.3.329
H. Abbas, N. Siddiqui, T. Almusallam, A. Abadel, H. Elsanadedy, Y. Al-Salloum
{"title":"钢筋间距对抛物冲击下混凝土板性能的影响","authors":"H. Abbas, N. Siddiqui, T. Almusallam, A. Abadel, H. Elsanadedy, Y. Al-Salloum","doi":"10.12989/SEM.2021.77.3.329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the effect of different steel bar configurations on the quasi-static punching and impact response of concrete slabs was studied. A total of forty RC square slab specimens were cast in two groups of concrete strengths of 40 and 63 MPa. In each group of twenty specimens, ten specimens were reinforced at the back face (singly reinforced), and the remaining specimens were reinforced on both faces of the slab (doubly reinforced). Two rebar spacing of 25 and 100 mm, with constant reinforcement ratio and effective depth, were used in both singly and doubly reinforced slab specimens. The specimens were tested against the normal impact of cylindrical projectiles of hemispherical nose shape. Slabs were also quasi-statically tested in punching using the same projectile, which was employed for the impact testing. The experimental response illustrates that 25 mm spaced rebars are effective in (I) decreasing the local damage and overall penetration depth, (II) increasing the absorption of impact energy, and (III) enhancing the ballistic limit of RC slabs. The ballistic limit was predicted using the quasi-static punching test results of slab specimens showing a strong correlation between the dynamic perforation energy and the energy required for quasi-static perforation of slabs.","PeriodicalId":51181,"journal":{"name":"Structural Engineering and Mechanics","volume":"77 1","pages":"329-342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of rebar spacing on the behavior of concrete slabs under projectile impact\",\"authors\":\"H. Abbas, N. Siddiqui, T. Almusallam, A. Abadel, H. Elsanadedy, Y. Al-Salloum\",\"doi\":\"10.12989/SEM.2021.77.3.329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the effect of different steel bar configurations on the quasi-static punching and impact response of concrete slabs was studied. A total of forty RC square slab specimens were cast in two groups of concrete strengths of 40 and 63 MPa. In each group of twenty specimens, ten specimens were reinforced at the back face (singly reinforced), and the remaining specimens were reinforced on both faces of the slab (doubly reinforced). Two rebar spacing of 25 and 100 mm, with constant reinforcement ratio and effective depth, were used in both singly and doubly reinforced slab specimens. The specimens were tested against the normal impact of cylindrical projectiles of hemispherical nose shape. Slabs were also quasi-statically tested in punching using the same projectile, which was employed for the impact testing. The experimental response illustrates that 25 mm spaced rebars are effective in (I) decreasing the local damage and overall penetration depth, (II) increasing the absorption of impact energy, and (III) enhancing the ballistic limit of RC slabs. The ballistic limit was predicted using the quasi-static punching test results of slab specimens showing a strong correlation between the dynamic perforation energy and the energy required for quasi-static perforation of slabs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Engineering and Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"329-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Engineering and Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2021.77.3.329\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Engineering and Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2021.77.3.329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文研究了不同钢筋配置对混凝土板准静态冲孔和冲击响应的影响。混凝土强度分别为40和63 MPa,共40个RC方板试件进行浇筑。每组20个试件,背面加筋10个试件(单加筋),两侧加筋(双加筋)。单加筋和双加筋板均采用间距为25和100 mm的两根钢筋,配筋率和有效深度不变。对试样进行了半球形柱面弹丸的正常冲击试验。用相同的弹丸对板料进行了准静力冲击试验,该弹丸用于冲击试验。试验结果表明,25mm间距钢筋对降低混凝土板的局部损伤和整体侵彻深度、增加冲击能吸收、提高混凝土板的弹道极限具有显著的作用。利用板坯的准静态冲孔试验结果预测了板坯的弹道极限,结果表明,板坯的动态穿孔能量与板坯准静态穿孔所需能量之间存在很强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of rebar spacing on the behavior of concrete slabs under projectile impact
In this paper, the effect of different steel bar configurations on the quasi-static punching and impact response of concrete slabs was studied. A total of forty RC square slab specimens were cast in two groups of concrete strengths of 40 and 63 MPa. In each group of twenty specimens, ten specimens were reinforced at the back face (singly reinforced), and the remaining specimens were reinforced on both faces of the slab (doubly reinforced). Two rebar spacing of 25 and 100 mm, with constant reinforcement ratio and effective depth, were used in both singly and doubly reinforced slab specimens. The specimens were tested against the normal impact of cylindrical projectiles of hemispherical nose shape. Slabs were also quasi-statically tested in punching using the same projectile, which was employed for the impact testing. The experimental response illustrates that 25 mm spaced rebars are effective in (I) decreasing the local damage and overall penetration depth, (II) increasing the absorption of impact energy, and (III) enhancing the ballistic limit of RC slabs. The ballistic limit was predicted using the quasi-static punching test results of slab specimens showing a strong correlation between the dynamic perforation energy and the energy required for quasi-static perforation of slabs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Engineering and Mechanics
Structural Engineering and Mechanics 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 months
期刊介绍: The STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, An International Journal, aims at: providing a major publication channel for structural engineering, wider distribution at more affordable subscription rates; faster reviewing and publication for manuscripts submitted; and a broad scope for wider participation. The main subject of the Journal is structural engineering concerned with aspects of mechanics. Areas covered by the Journal include: - Structural Mechanics - Design of Civil, Building and Mechanical Structures - Structural Optimization and Controls - Structural Safety and Reliability - New Structural Materials and Applications - Effects of Wind, Earthquake and Wave Loadings on Structures - Fluid-Structure and Soil-Structure Interactions - AI Application and Expert Systems in Structural Engineering. Submission of papers from practicing engineers is particularly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Neonatal Onset Distal Renal Tubular Acidosis: Description of Two Novel Variants on the ATP6V0A4 Gene and Review of the Literature on Associated Extrarenal Manifestations. Approach to the Patient: Management of Pituitary Hormone Replacement Through Transition. Seismic performance of exterior r/c beam-column joint under varying axial force A model for investigating vehicle-bridge interaction under high moving speed A simplified method for free vibration analysis of wall-frames considering soil structure interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1