密苏里州五个不同地点拉莫特砂岩的地球化学封存反应

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Environmental Geosciences Pub Date : 2013-09-01 DOI:10.1306/EG.01141312010
N. Rono, R. Biagioni, C. Rovey, M. Gutiérrez
{"title":"密苏里州五个不同地点拉莫特砂岩的地球化学封存反应","authors":"N. Rono, R. Biagioni, C. Rovey, M. Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1306/EG.01141312010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geochemical reactions that may occur on CO2 injection into a sandstone formation in Missouri (MO) were investigated by means of geochemical modeling. Five possible injection sites were considered: two in the northwestern part of the state, two in the northeastearn part, and one in the southwestern part. The Geochemist Workbench software was used to investigate solubility trapping and mineral precipitation. Modeling was performed for two periods: an injection period of 10 yr and a postinjection period where the reactions proceeded to equilibrium. The work presented substantial challenges. Among them are uncertainty in kinetic constants for the dissolution and precipitation of minerals on CO2 injection. Model results include equilibrium values for CO2 stored via solubility trapping ranging from 49-g CO2/kg free formation water in Northeast MO to 78-g CO2/kg free formation water for Southwest MO. Mineral trapping is significantly lower, between 2.6- and 18.4-g CO2/kg free formation water. The model shows siderite and dawsonite as the major carbonate minerals formed, in this order. On a volumetric basis, northwest MO sequestration values were slightly greater than those obtained for northeast MO because of the somewhat greater depth and higher injection pressure at the injection target (Lamotte Sandstone) at the northwestern sites. However, the greater thickness of the aquifer for the northeastern sites provided overall greater sequestration capacity. Greene County was altogether unfit for sequestration because of the low total dissolved solids value of the formation water.","PeriodicalId":11706,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geochemical sequestration reactions within the Lamotte Sandstone at five different locations in Missouri\",\"authors\":\"N. Rono, R. Biagioni, C. Rovey, M. Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1306/EG.01141312010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Geochemical reactions that may occur on CO2 injection into a sandstone formation in Missouri (MO) were investigated by means of geochemical modeling. Five possible injection sites were considered: two in the northwestern part of the state, two in the northeastearn part, and one in the southwestern part. The Geochemist Workbench software was used to investigate solubility trapping and mineral precipitation. Modeling was performed for two periods: an injection period of 10 yr and a postinjection period where the reactions proceeded to equilibrium. The work presented substantial challenges. Among them are uncertainty in kinetic constants for the dissolution and precipitation of minerals on CO2 injection. Model results include equilibrium values for CO2 stored via solubility trapping ranging from 49-g CO2/kg free formation water in Northeast MO to 78-g CO2/kg free formation water for Southwest MO. Mineral trapping is significantly lower, between 2.6- and 18.4-g CO2/kg free formation water. The model shows siderite and dawsonite as the major carbonate minerals formed, in this order. On a volumetric basis, northwest MO sequestration values were slightly greater than those obtained for northeast MO because of the somewhat greater depth and higher injection pressure at the injection target (Lamotte Sandstone) at the northwestern sites. However, the greater thickness of the aquifer for the northeastern sites provided overall greater sequestration capacity. Greene County was altogether unfit for sequestration because of the low total dissolved solids value of the formation water.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Geosciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.01141312010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.01141312010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用地球化学模拟的方法研究了美国密苏里州砂岩地层注入二氧化碳后可能发生的地球化学反应。考虑了五个可能的注射地点:两个在该州的西北部,两个在东北部,一个在西南部。利用地球化学工作台软件研究溶解度捕获和矿物沉淀。建模分为两个阶段:注射期为10年,注射后反应达到平衡。这项工作提出了巨大的挑战。其中包括CO2注入过程中矿物溶解和沉淀动力学常数的不确定性。模型结果显示,通过溶解度捕集储存的二氧化碳平衡值从东北地区的49 g CO2/kg游离地层水到西南地区的78 g CO2/kg游离地层水不等。矿物捕集的二氧化碳含量明显较低,在2.6- 18.4 g CO2/kg游离地层水之间。模型显示,菱铁矿和钙镁石是主要的碳酸盐矿物形成顺序。从体积上看,由于注入靶区(拉莫特砂岩)的注入深度和注入压力较大,西北地区的MO固存值略高于东北地区。然而,东北地区的含水层厚度越大,总体上的封存能力就越大。由于地层水的总溶解固形物值较低,格林县完全不适合封存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geochemical sequestration reactions within the Lamotte Sandstone at five different locations in Missouri
Geochemical reactions that may occur on CO2 injection into a sandstone formation in Missouri (MO) were investigated by means of geochemical modeling. Five possible injection sites were considered: two in the northwestern part of the state, two in the northeastearn part, and one in the southwestern part. The Geochemist Workbench software was used to investigate solubility trapping and mineral precipitation. Modeling was performed for two periods: an injection period of 10 yr and a postinjection period where the reactions proceeded to equilibrium. The work presented substantial challenges. Among them are uncertainty in kinetic constants for the dissolution and precipitation of minerals on CO2 injection. Model results include equilibrium values for CO2 stored via solubility trapping ranging from 49-g CO2/kg free formation water in Northeast MO to 78-g CO2/kg free formation water for Southwest MO. Mineral trapping is significantly lower, between 2.6- and 18.4-g CO2/kg free formation water. The model shows siderite and dawsonite as the major carbonate minerals formed, in this order. On a volumetric basis, northwest MO sequestration values were slightly greater than those obtained for northeast MO because of the somewhat greater depth and higher injection pressure at the injection target (Lamotte Sandstone) at the northwestern sites. However, the greater thickness of the aquifer for the northeastern sites provided overall greater sequestration capacity. Greene County was altogether unfit for sequestration because of the low total dissolved solids value of the formation water.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Geosciences
Environmental Geosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seismic criteria and structural styles for half graben differential inversion: Implication for hydrocarbon accumulation, Abu Sennan blocks, Western Desert, Egypt Evidence of hydrothermal alteration in Devonian shales from the Eastern Gas Shales Project 2 core of the Rome trough, Appalachian Basin, United States The Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership petroleum fields database: Compilation, utilization, and support for CCUS activities Presence of hydrocarbons on Mars: A possibility Potential for carbon sequestration in the Hemlock Formation of the Cook Inlet basin, Alaska
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1