南乔治亚裂谷盆地地质储层CO2注入模拟:初步评估

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Environmental Geosciences Pub Date : 2015-03-01 DOI:10.1306/EG.09191414008
D. Brantley, J. Shafer, V. Lakshmi
{"title":"南乔治亚裂谷盆地地质储层CO2注入模拟:初步评估","authors":"D. Brantley, J. Shafer, V. Lakshmi","doi":"10.1306/EG.09191414008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study simulated the injection of supercritical phase into the South Georgia Rift (SGR) basin to evaluate the feasibility of long-term storage. Because of the lack of basin data, an equilibrium model was used to estimate the initial hydrostatic pressure, temperature, and salinity gradients that represent our study area. For the equilibrium model, the USGS SEAWAT program was used and for the injection simulation, TOUGH2-ECO2N was used. A stochastic approach was used to populate the permeability in the injection layer within the model domain. The statistical method to address permeability uncertainty and heterogeneity was sequential Gaussian simulation. The target injection depths are well below the 1 km (∼0.62 mi) depth required to maintain as a supercritical fluid. There were very little data pertaining to the properties in the deep Jurassic/Triassic SGR basin formations. So, conservative porosity and permeability starting points were postulated using data from analogous basins. This study simulated 30 million tons of injected at a rate of 1 million tons per year for 30 yr, which is the minimum capacity requirement by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for a viable storage reservoir. In addition to this requirement, a 970-yr shut-in time (no injection) was also simulated to better determine the long-term fate and migration of the injected and to ensure that the SGR basin could effectively contain 30 million tons of . The preliminary modeling of injection indicated that the SGR basin is suitable for geologic storage of this U.S. DOE stated minimum capacity.","PeriodicalId":11706,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1306/EG.09191414008","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CO2 injection simulation into the South Georgia Rift Basin for geologic storage: A preliminary assessment\",\"authors\":\"D. Brantley, J. Shafer, V. Lakshmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1306/EG.09191414008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study simulated the injection of supercritical phase into the South Georgia Rift (SGR) basin to evaluate the feasibility of long-term storage. Because of the lack of basin data, an equilibrium model was used to estimate the initial hydrostatic pressure, temperature, and salinity gradients that represent our study area. For the equilibrium model, the USGS SEAWAT program was used and for the injection simulation, TOUGH2-ECO2N was used. A stochastic approach was used to populate the permeability in the injection layer within the model domain. The statistical method to address permeability uncertainty and heterogeneity was sequential Gaussian simulation. The target injection depths are well below the 1 km (∼0.62 mi) depth required to maintain as a supercritical fluid. There were very little data pertaining to the properties in the deep Jurassic/Triassic SGR basin formations. So, conservative porosity and permeability starting points were postulated using data from analogous basins. This study simulated 30 million tons of injected at a rate of 1 million tons per year for 30 yr, which is the minimum capacity requirement by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for a viable storage reservoir. In addition to this requirement, a 970-yr shut-in time (no injection) was also simulated to better determine the long-term fate and migration of the injected and to ensure that the SGR basin could effectively contain 30 million tons of . The preliminary modeling of injection indicated that the SGR basin is suitable for geologic storage of this U.S. DOE stated minimum capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Geosciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1306/EG.09191414008\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.09191414008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.09191414008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

通过模拟超临界相注入南乔治亚裂谷(SGR)盆地,评价长期储层的可行性。由于缺乏盆地数据,我们使用平衡模型来估计代表我们研究区域的初始静水压力、温度和盐度梯度。平衡模型采用USGS SEAWAT程序,注入模拟采用TOUGH2-ECO2N。采用随机方法在模型域内填充注入层渗透率。处理渗透率不确定性和非均质性的统计方法是序贯高斯模拟。目标注入深度远低于维持超临界流体所需的1公里(0.62英里)深度。关于深侏罗系/三叠系SGR盆地地层性质的资料很少。因此,使用类似盆地的数据假设保守的孔隙度和渗透率起点。本研究以每年100万吨的速度模拟了3000万吨的注入量,持续30年,这是美国能源部(DOE)对可行储层的最低容量要求。此外,还模拟了970年的关井时间(不注入),以更好地确定注入的长期命运和运移,并确保SGR盆地可以有效容纳3000万吨天然气。初步的注入模拟表明,SGR盆地适合美国能源部规定的最小容量的地质储存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CO2 injection simulation into the South Georgia Rift Basin for geologic storage: A preliminary assessment
This study simulated the injection of supercritical phase into the South Georgia Rift (SGR) basin to evaluate the feasibility of long-term storage. Because of the lack of basin data, an equilibrium model was used to estimate the initial hydrostatic pressure, temperature, and salinity gradients that represent our study area. For the equilibrium model, the USGS SEAWAT program was used and for the injection simulation, TOUGH2-ECO2N was used. A stochastic approach was used to populate the permeability in the injection layer within the model domain. The statistical method to address permeability uncertainty and heterogeneity was sequential Gaussian simulation. The target injection depths are well below the 1 km (∼0.62 mi) depth required to maintain as a supercritical fluid. There were very little data pertaining to the properties in the deep Jurassic/Triassic SGR basin formations. So, conservative porosity and permeability starting points were postulated using data from analogous basins. This study simulated 30 million tons of injected at a rate of 1 million tons per year for 30 yr, which is the minimum capacity requirement by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for a viable storage reservoir. In addition to this requirement, a 970-yr shut-in time (no injection) was also simulated to better determine the long-term fate and migration of the injected and to ensure that the SGR basin could effectively contain 30 million tons of . The preliminary modeling of injection indicated that the SGR basin is suitable for geologic storage of this U.S. DOE stated minimum capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Geosciences
Environmental Geosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seismic criteria and structural styles for half graben differential inversion: Implication for hydrocarbon accumulation, Abu Sennan blocks, Western Desert, Egypt Evidence of hydrothermal alteration in Devonian shales from the Eastern Gas Shales Project 2 core of the Rome trough, Appalachian Basin, United States The Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership petroleum fields database: Compilation, utilization, and support for CCUS activities Presence of hydrocarbons on Mars: A possibility Potential for carbon sequestration in the Hemlock Formation of the Cook Inlet basin, Alaska
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1