在Ketzin二氧化碳储存试验场的长期地表二氧化碳通量监测

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Environmental Geosciences Pub Date : 2011-06-01 DOI:10.1306/EG.11181010017
M. Zimmer, P. Pilz, J. Erzinger
{"title":"在Ketzin二氧化碳储存试验场的长期地表二氧化碳通量监测","authors":"M. Zimmer, P. Pilz, J. Erzinger","doi":"10.1306/EG.11181010017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subsurface geologic storage of carbon dioxide calls for sophisticated monitoring tools with respect to long-term safety and environmental impact issues. Despite extensive research, many factors governing the fate of injected carbon dioxide (CO2) remain unclear. To identify possible risks through leakage of the CO2 storage reservoir, a program for monitoring of the CO2 flux at the surface was started at the Ketzin test site, which allows to distinguish between natural temporal and spatial flux variations and a potential leakage. To gain adequate long-term baseline data on the local background CO2 flux variations, CO2 soil gas flux, soil moisture, and temperature measurements were conducted once a month during a 6-yr period. Furthermore, soil samples were analyzed for their organic carbon and total nitrogen contents. The mean flux of all sampling sites before the CO2 injection (2005–2007) was 2.8 mol m2 s1 (ranging from 2.4 to 3.5), with a Q10 factor of 2.4, and in the years after commencing injection (2009–2010), 2.4 mol m2 s1 (ranging from 2.2 to 2.5), with the same Q10 factor. The CO2 flux rate is mainly controlled by the soil temperature. A significant influence of diurnal temperature variation and soil moisture was not detected. The spatial variability of the CO2 flux among the 20 sampling locations ranges from 1.0 to 4.5 mol m2 s1, depending on the organic carbon and total nitrogen content of the soil. Through comparison with the long-term measurements, unusual high CO2 fluxes can theoretically be distinguished from natural variations.","PeriodicalId":11706,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1306/EG.11181010017","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term surface carbon dioxide flux monitoring at the Ketzin carbon dioxide storage test site\",\"authors\":\"M. Zimmer, P. Pilz, J. Erzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1306/EG.11181010017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subsurface geologic storage of carbon dioxide calls for sophisticated monitoring tools with respect to long-term safety and environmental impact issues. Despite extensive research, many factors governing the fate of injected carbon dioxide (CO2) remain unclear. To identify possible risks through leakage of the CO2 storage reservoir, a program for monitoring of the CO2 flux at the surface was started at the Ketzin test site, which allows to distinguish between natural temporal and spatial flux variations and a potential leakage. To gain adequate long-term baseline data on the local background CO2 flux variations, CO2 soil gas flux, soil moisture, and temperature measurements were conducted once a month during a 6-yr period. Furthermore, soil samples were analyzed for their organic carbon and total nitrogen contents. The mean flux of all sampling sites before the CO2 injection (2005–2007) was 2.8 mol m2 s1 (ranging from 2.4 to 3.5), with a Q10 factor of 2.4, and in the years after commencing injection (2009–2010), 2.4 mol m2 s1 (ranging from 2.2 to 2.5), with the same Q10 factor. The CO2 flux rate is mainly controlled by the soil temperature. A significant influence of diurnal temperature variation and soil moisture was not detected. The spatial variability of the CO2 flux among the 20 sampling locations ranges from 1.0 to 4.5 mol m2 s1, depending on the organic carbon and total nitrogen content of the soil. Through comparison with the long-term measurements, unusual high CO2 fluxes can theoretically be distinguished from natural variations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Geosciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1306/EG.11181010017\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.11181010017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.11181010017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

二氧化碳的地下地质储存需要复杂的监测工具,以解决长期安全和环境影响问题。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但控制注入二氧化碳命运的许多因素仍不清楚。为了识别二氧化碳储存库泄漏可能带来的风险,在Ketzin试验场启动了一项监测地表二氧化碳通量的计划,该计划可以区分自然时空通量变化和潜在泄漏。为了获得关于当地背景CO2通量变化的充分的长期基线数据,在6年期间每月进行一次CO2土壤气体通量、土壤湿度和温度测量。此外,对土壤样品的有机碳和全氮含量进行了分析。注CO2前(2005-2007年)各样点的平均通量为2.8 mol m2 s1(范围在2.4 ~ 3.5之间),Q10因子为2.4;注CO2后(2009-2010年)各样点的平均通量为2.4 mol m2 s1(范围在2.2 ~ 2.5之间),Q10因子相同。CO2通量速率主要受土壤温度控制。日温变化和土壤湿度对土壤湿度的影响不显著。20个采样点CO2通量的空间变异性在1.0 ~ 4.5 mol m2 s1之间,与土壤有机碳和全氮含量有关。通过与长期测量结果的比较,理论上可以将不寻常的高CO2通量与自然变化区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term surface carbon dioxide flux monitoring at the Ketzin carbon dioxide storage test site
Subsurface geologic storage of carbon dioxide calls for sophisticated monitoring tools with respect to long-term safety and environmental impact issues. Despite extensive research, many factors governing the fate of injected carbon dioxide (CO2) remain unclear. To identify possible risks through leakage of the CO2 storage reservoir, a program for monitoring of the CO2 flux at the surface was started at the Ketzin test site, which allows to distinguish between natural temporal and spatial flux variations and a potential leakage. To gain adequate long-term baseline data on the local background CO2 flux variations, CO2 soil gas flux, soil moisture, and temperature measurements were conducted once a month during a 6-yr period. Furthermore, soil samples were analyzed for their organic carbon and total nitrogen contents. The mean flux of all sampling sites before the CO2 injection (2005–2007) was 2.8 mol m2 s1 (ranging from 2.4 to 3.5), with a Q10 factor of 2.4, and in the years after commencing injection (2009–2010), 2.4 mol m2 s1 (ranging from 2.2 to 2.5), with the same Q10 factor. The CO2 flux rate is mainly controlled by the soil temperature. A significant influence of diurnal temperature variation and soil moisture was not detected. The spatial variability of the CO2 flux among the 20 sampling locations ranges from 1.0 to 4.5 mol m2 s1, depending on the organic carbon and total nitrogen content of the soil. Through comparison with the long-term measurements, unusual high CO2 fluxes can theoretically be distinguished from natural variations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Geosciences
Environmental Geosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seismic criteria and structural styles for half graben differential inversion: Implication for hydrocarbon accumulation, Abu Sennan blocks, Western Desert, Egypt Evidence of hydrothermal alteration in Devonian shales from the Eastern Gas Shales Project 2 core of the Rome trough, Appalachian Basin, United States The Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership petroleum fields database: Compilation, utilization, and support for CCUS activities Presence of hydrocarbons on Mars: A possibility Potential for carbon sequestration in the Hemlock Formation of the Cook Inlet basin, Alaska
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1