货币主义和财政主义

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS PSL Quarterly Review Pub Date : 2014-01-20 DOI:10.13133/2037-3643/11564
D. Fand
{"title":"货币主义和财政主义","authors":"D. Fand","doi":"10.13133/2037-3643/11564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monetarism and Fiscalism have emerged as two alternative stabilisation strategies that are in contention at this time. Monetarism seeks to control the monetary aggregates in order to stabilise the growth in money income, while Fiscalism centres its policies on controlling the degree of stimulus or restraint in the budget. The present work examines the substantive differences between Monetarists and Fiscalists concerning the theory or money, the theory of interest rates and prices, the theory of fiscal policy, and their respective views on rules, guidelines, discretion etc. This analysis of their aggregative theories is then used to identify some essential analytical and policy differences between Monetarists and Fiscalists, form any other differences that reflect transitory factors and may therefore diminish in time.","PeriodicalId":44488,"journal":{"name":"PSL Quarterly Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monetarism and fiscalism\",\"authors\":\"D. Fand\",\"doi\":\"10.13133/2037-3643/11564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Monetarism and Fiscalism have emerged as two alternative stabilisation strategies that are in contention at this time. Monetarism seeks to control the monetary aggregates in order to stabilise the growth in money income, while Fiscalism centres its policies on controlling the degree of stimulus or restraint in the budget. The present work examines the substantive differences between Monetarists and Fiscalists concerning the theory or money, the theory of interest rates and prices, the theory of fiscal policy, and their respective views on rules, guidelines, discretion etc. This analysis of their aggregative theories is then used to identify some essential analytical and policy differences between Monetarists and Fiscalists, form any other differences that reflect transitory factors and may therefore diminish in time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSL Quarterly Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSL Quarterly Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/11564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSL Quarterly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/11564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

货币主义和财政主义已成为目前争论的两种稳定策略。货币主义寻求控制货币总量,以稳定货币收入的增长,而财政主义的政策重点是控制预算中刺激或限制的程度。目前的工作考察了货币主义者和财政主义者之间关于货币理论、利率和价格理论、财政政策理论以及他们各自对规则、指导方针、自由裁量权等的看法的实质性差异。这种对他们的综合理论的分析然后被用来确定货币主义者和财政主义者之间的一些基本分析和政策差异,形成反映暂时因素的任何其他差异,因此可能随着时间的推移而减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monetarism and fiscalism
Monetarism and Fiscalism have emerged as two alternative stabilisation strategies that are in contention at this time. Monetarism seeks to control the monetary aggregates in order to stabilise the growth in money income, while Fiscalism centres its policies on controlling the degree of stimulus or restraint in the budget. The present work examines the substantive differences between Monetarists and Fiscalists concerning the theory or money, the theory of interest rates and prices, the theory of fiscal policy, and their respective views on rules, guidelines, discretion etc. This analysis of their aggregative theories is then used to identify some essential analytical and policy differences between Monetarists and Fiscalists, form any other differences that reflect transitory factors and may therefore diminish in time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Foreword: A debate on the future of economic policy Employment dynamics, increasing returns and Marx’s falling rate of profit The European industrial challenge and the Italian NRRP Major exchange rates and value-added exports Editorial: Italy’s “Charter of Workers’ Rights” turns fifty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1