浅析Okishio定理

Bin Yu
{"title":"浅析Okishio定理","authors":"Bin Yu","doi":"10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.2.0192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Okishio theorem is a classic theory of Japanese Marxism that denies the law of the decline of the general rate of profit proposed by Marx in the third volume of Capital. The theorem seriously affects the correct understanding of the mode of production and the economic crisis in capitalist countries today. Analyzing the original text of the Okishio theorem, this article finds that the theorem does not distinguish between paid and unpaid labor, and that its mathematical model is based on an incorrect understanding of Marx’s views and of the capitalist mode of production. The theorem’s mathematical proof process is itself untenable and even contradicts the numerical examples that Okishio gives. In fact, Okishio negates Marx’s view by effectively denying the existence of the capitalist mode of production. Unexpectedly, this article also finds that a decline in the general rate of profit will result even if all enterprises do not increase their organic composition of capital, but if only enterprises with a higher organic composition of capital expand their proportions in the economy.","PeriodicalId":41482,"journal":{"name":"World Review of Political Economy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Okishio Theorem\",\"authors\":\"Bin Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.2.0192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Okishio theorem is a classic theory of Japanese Marxism that denies the law of the decline of the general rate of profit proposed by Marx in the third volume of Capital. The theorem seriously affects the correct understanding of the mode of production and the economic crisis in capitalist countries today. Analyzing the original text of the Okishio theorem, this article finds that the theorem does not distinguish between paid and unpaid labor, and that its mathematical model is based on an incorrect understanding of Marx’s views and of the capitalist mode of production. The theorem’s mathematical proof process is itself untenable and even contradicts the numerical examples that Okishio gives. In fact, Okishio negates Marx’s view by effectively denying the existence of the capitalist mode of production. Unexpectedly, this article also finds that a decline in the general rate of profit will result even if all enterprises do not increase their organic composition of capital, but if only enterprises with a higher organic composition of capital expand their proportions in the economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Review of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Review of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.2.0192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Review of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.2.0192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冲尾定理是否定马克思在《资本论》第三卷中提出的一般利润率下降规律的日本马克思主义经典理论。这一定理严重影响着当今资本主义国家对生产方式和经济危机的正确认识。本文分析了Okishio定理的原文,发现该定理没有区分有偿劳动和无偿劳动,其数学模型是建立在对马克思观点和资本主义生产方式的错误理解之上的。这个定理的数学证明过程本身是站不住脚的,甚至与Okishio给出的数值例子相矛盾。事实上,他通过否定资本主义生产方式的存在而否定了马克思的观点。出乎意料的是,本文还发现,即使不是所有企业都增加其资本有机构成,但只有资本有机构成较高的企业扩大其在经济中的比例,一般利润率也会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of the Okishio Theorem
The Okishio theorem is a classic theory of Japanese Marxism that denies the law of the decline of the general rate of profit proposed by Marx in the third volume of Capital. The theorem seriously affects the correct understanding of the mode of production and the economic crisis in capitalist countries today. Analyzing the original text of the Okishio theorem, this article finds that the theorem does not distinguish between paid and unpaid labor, and that its mathematical model is based on an incorrect understanding of Marx’s views and of the capitalist mode of production. The theorem’s mathematical proof process is itself untenable and even contradicts the numerical examples that Okishio gives. In fact, Okishio negates Marx’s view by effectively denying the existence of the capitalist mode of production. Unexpectedly, this article also finds that a decline in the general rate of profit will result even if all enterprises do not increase their organic composition of capital, but if only enterprises with a higher organic composition of capital expand their proportions in the economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Formalization of Marx’s Economics Understanding the “Service Economy”—A Marxist Critical Approach The Labor Theory of Value and the Problem of Joint Production A Comparison of Capital and Labor Incomes in Finance and Manufacturing Sectors in OECD Countries: 1995–2019 Analysis of the Imperial Rent of Reserve Currency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1