理解“服务经济”——马克思主义的批判途径

Chenxi Gao, Masao Watanabe
{"title":"理解“服务经济”——马克思主义的批判途径","authors":"Chenxi Gao, Masao Watanabe","doi":"10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.14.1.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to clarify certain misunderstandings about productive/unproductive labour (PUPL) concerning the “service economy.” The concept of service labour is embedded in the discussion of PUPL. After examining Smith’s and Marx’s definitions of “service” and “service labour,” we demonstrate that criticisms of the connotation of “service” in Smith’s literature are based on a misinterpretation of the classical definition of the term and are not consistent with the post-industrialist dogma on “service economy.” Therefore, despite the growing importance of tertiary activities, we have to reject certain Marxists’ proposals that urge us to regard non-material labour in the tertiary industry as “labour productive of value,” and remain careful in applying the PUPL theory to the modern economy.","PeriodicalId":41482,"journal":{"name":"World Review of Political Economy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the “Service Economy”—A Marxist Critical Approach\",\"authors\":\"Chenxi Gao, Masao Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.14.1.0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article attempts to clarify certain misunderstandings about productive/unproductive labour (PUPL) concerning the “service economy.” The concept of service labour is embedded in the discussion of PUPL. After examining Smith’s and Marx’s definitions of “service” and “service labour,” we demonstrate that criticisms of the connotation of “service” in Smith’s literature are based on a misinterpretation of the classical definition of the term and are not consistent with the post-industrialist dogma on “service economy.” Therefore, despite the growing importance of tertiary activities, we have to reject certain Marxists’ proposals that urge us to regard non-material labour in the tertiary industry as “labour productive of value,” and remain careful in applying the PUPL theory to the modern economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Review of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Review of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.14.1.0034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Review of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.14.1.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图澄清在“服务经济”中对生产性劳动和非生产性劳动的一些误解。服务劳动的概念被嵌入到pupll的讨论中。在考察了斯密和马克思对“服务”和“服务劳动”的定义后,我们发现斯密文献中对“服务”内涵的批评是基于对该术语经典定义的误解,与后工业主义关于“服务经济”的教条不一致。因此,尽管第三产业活动的重要性日益增加,但我们必须拒绝某些马克思主义者的建议,这些建议敦促我们将第三产业中的非物质劳动视为“生产价值的劳动”,并在将pupll理论应用于现代经济时保持谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the “Service Economy”—A Marxist Critical Approach
This article attempts to clarify certain misunderstandings about productive/unproductive labour (PUPL) concerning the “service economy.” The concept of service labour is embedded in the discussion of PUPL. After examining Smith’s and Marx’s definitions of “service” and “service labour,” we demonstrate that criticisms of the connotation of “service” in Smith’s literature are based on a misinterpretation of the classical definition of the term and are not consistent with the post-industrialist dogma on “service economy.” Therefore, despite the growing importance of tertiary activities, we have to reject certain Marxists’ proposals that urge us to regard non-material labour in the tertiary industry as “labour productive of value,” and remain careful in applying the PUPL theory to the modern economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Formalization of Marx’s Economics Understanding the “Service Economy”—A Marxist Critical Approach The Labor Theory of Value and the Problem of Joint Production A Comparison of Capital and Labor Incomes in Finance and Manufacturing Sectors in OECD Countries: 1995–2019 Analysis of the Imperial Rent of Reserve Currency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1