消防专家证人及其在安全系统中的作用

K. Pachnik
{"title":"消防专家证人及其在安全系统中的作用","authors":"K. Pachnik","doi":"10.12845/sft.53.1.2019.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of the article is to present and characterise the professionals who – thanks to their specialised knowledge – are part of the safety system. Introduction: Fire prevention and identifying the causes of fires are key issues in the internal safety system. The authorities are not capable of executing their powers without support from professionals who have the necessary qualifications. In the Polish legal system, there are a number of professionals who have specialised knowledge (expertise), which is the reason for engaging them in the process of making judgments and decisions by judicial and administrative authorities. Such tasks are mostly associated with the profession of a (court) expert witness. With regard to firefighting, there are also fire-safety expert witnesses. There are no complex legal regulations concerning such experts. The level of competence needed for obtaining the status of an expert witness or other firefighting expert is regulated in several different legal acts. Only a comprehensive study of such acts could help explain the role of professionals with specialised knowledge within the safety system. Methodology: This study is based on a theoretical analysis of the legal system and a comparison of the solutions adopted in specific acts with their interpretations in court decisions and relevant literature. Conclusions: It has been found that, when exercising public powers concerning fire prevention, there is a legal requirement to use the assistance provided by other professionals with specialised knowledge and firefighting expert status. In addition, during administrative or court proceedings and investigations there is a legal obligation to only use (court) expert witness assistance. Those professionals need to meet specific criteria to be able to perform their functions. The primary requirement is that they have the necessary qualifications (knowledge and experience) to issue expert opinions. The support of expert witnesses is also desirable in the winding-up proceedings of insurance companies concerning the payment of compensation for damages resulting from fire. However, even the most renowned expert witnesses cannot make final decisions for the authority that seeks their assistance, and their opinions are never binding.","PeriodicalId":34374,"journal":{"name":"Safety Fire Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firefighting Expert Witnesses and Their Role in the Safety System\",\"authors\":\"K. Pachnik\",\"doi\":\"10.12845/sft.53.1.2019.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of the article is to present and characterise the professionals who – thanks to their specialised knowledge – are part of the safety system. Introduction: Fire prevention and identifying the causes of fires are key issues in the internal safety system. The authorities are not capable of executing their powers without support from professionals who have the necessary qualifications. In the Polish legal system, there are a number of professionals who have specialised knowledge (expertise), which is the reason for engaging them in the process of making judgments and decisions by judicial and administrative authorities. Such tasks are mostly associated with the profession of a (court) expert witness. With regard to firefighting, there are also fire-safety expert witnesses. There are no complex legal regulations concerning such experts. The level of competence needed for obtaining the status of an expert witness or other firefighting expert is regulated in several different legal acts. Only a comprehensive study of such acts could help explain the role of professionals with specialised knowledge within the safety system. Methodology: This study is based on a theoretical analysis of the legal system and a comparison of the solutions adopted in specific acts with their interpretations in court decisions and relevant literature. Conclusions: It has been found that, when exercising public powers concerning fire prevention, there is a legal requirement to use the assistance provided by other professionals with specialised knowledge and firefighting expert status. In addition, during administrative or court proceedings and investigations there is a legal obligation to only use (court) expert witness assistance. Those professionals need to meet specific criteria to be able to perform their functions. The primary requirement is that they have the necessary qualifications (knowledge and experience) to issue expert opinions. The support of expert witnesses is also desirable in the winding-up proceedings of insurance companies concerning the payment of compensation for damages resulting from fire. However, even the most renowned expert witnesses cannot make final decisions for the authority that seeks their assistance, and their opinions are never binding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety Fire Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety Fire Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12845/sft.53.1.2019.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12845/sft.53.1.2019.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:文章的目的是目前和表征的专业人士谁-由于他们的专业知识-是安全系统的一部分。防火和确定火灾原因是内部安全系统的关键问题。如果没有具备必要资格的专业人员的支持,当局就无法执行其权力。在波兰的法律制度中,有一些具有专门知识(专门知识)的专业人员,这是让他们参与司法和行政当局作出判决和决定过程的原因。这些任务大多与(法庭)专家证人的职业有关。在消防方面,也有消防安全专家证人。对这类专家没有复杂的法律规定。获得专家证人或其他消防专家地位所需的能力水平在几个不同的法律法案中有规定。只有对这些行为进行全面研究,才能帮助解释具有专门知识的专业人员在安全系统中的作用。研究方法:本研究基于对法律制度的理论分析,并将具体行为中采用的解决方案与法院判决和相关文献中的解释进行比较。结论:通过研究发现,在行使消防公共权力时,法律要求使用具有专业知识和消防专家身份的其他专业人员提供的协助。此外,在行政或法庭诉讼和调查期间,法律上有义务只使用(法庭)专家证人协助。这些专业人员需要满足特定的标准才能履行其职能。首要的要求是他们有必要的资格(知识和经验)来发表专家意见。在保险公司关于支付火灾造成的损害赔偿的清盘程序中,专家证人的支持也是可取的。然而,即使是最著名的专家证人也不能为寻求他们帮助的当局做出最终决定,他们的意见也永远没有约束力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Firefighting Expert Witnesses and Their Role in the Safety System
Objective: The aim of the article is to present and characterise the professionals who – thanks to their specialised knowledge – are part of the safety system. Introduction: Fire prevention and identifying the causes of fires are key issues in the internal safety system. The authorities are not capable of executing their powers without support from professionals who have the necessary qualifications. In the Polish legal system, there are a number of professionals who have specialised knowledge (expertise), which is the reason for engaging them in the process of making judgments and decisions by judicial and administrative authorities. Such tasks are mostly associated with the profession of a (court) expert witness. With regard to firefighting, there are also fire-safety expert witnesses. There are no complex legal regulations concerning such experts. The level of competence needed for obtaining the status of an expert witness or other firefighting expert is regulated in several different legal acts. Only a comprehensive study of such acts could help explain the role of professionals with specialised knowledge within the safety system. Methodology: This study is based on a theoretical analysis of the legal system and a comparison of the solutions adopted in specific acts with their interpretations in court decisions and relevant literature. Conclusions: It has been found that, when exercising public powers concerning fire prevention, there is a legal requirement to use the assistance provided by other professionals with specialised knowledge and firefighting expert status. In addition, during administrative or court proceedings and investigations there is a legal obligation to only use (court) expert witness assistance. Those professionals need to meet specific criteria to be able to perform their functions. The primary requirement is that they have the necessary qualifications (knowledge and experience) to issue expert opinions. The support of expert witnesses is also desirable in the winding-up proceedings of insurance companies concerning the payment of compensation for damages resulting from fire. However, even the most renowned expert witnesses cannot make final decisions for the authority that seeks their assistance, and their opinions are never binding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Important Parameters and Settings in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Critical Infrastructure in Poland during the COVID-19 Pandemic Changes in the Requirements for Placing Construction Products for Fire Protection Marked with a Construction Mark on the Market or Making Them Available on the National Market – Update Functional and Performance Characteristics Including Principles of Placing the Elements of Voice Alarm Systems on the Market Waste in the Context of Combustibility – Classification Possibilities in Legal Terms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1