外国直接投资和进口对经济增长的影响:泰国和菲律宾的比较分析(1970-1998)

J. Damooei, A. Tavakoli
{"title":"外国直接投资和进口对经济增长的影响:泰国和菲律宾的比较分析(1970-1998)","authors":"J. Damooei, A. Tavakoli","doi":"10.1353/JDA.2006.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this paper is to estimate the output elasticity of foreign direct investment (FDI) and imports in Thailand and in the Philippines during the period 1970–1998. Applying a CES generalization of Cobb-Douglas production function, the output response to FDI is the same in both countries, but imports affect Thailand more than the Philippines. The FDI contribution to every one percentage growth point is about 0.05 of a percentage point in each country where imports contribute about 0.47 of a percentage point in Thailand and 0.31 of a percentage point in the Philippines. As a result, the foreign investment and imports contribute about 52 percent of every one percentage growth point in Thailand compared to a lower 36 percent in the Philippines. The remaining effects on the economic growth are from labor and domestic investment. Both countries are labor intensive, but the impact of labor is more significant in the Philippines. The Philippine economy is also more domestic capital intensive than the Thai economy. Furthermore, the FDI path shows that the effect of foreign investment is more pronounced in the Philippines during the second half of the 1990s, whereas the imports are more effective in Thailand since 1994. Therefore, the Philippine economy could gain more from directing its economic policies to further liberalize its foreign investments. The Thai economy, on the other hand, should continue its reliance on imported foreign technology in order to accelerate its economic growth.","PeriodicalId":84983,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Developing Areas","volume":"39 1","pages":"100 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JDA.2006.0002","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment And Imports on Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis of Thailand and the Philippines (1970-1998)\",\"authors\":\"J. Damooei, A. Tavakoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/JDA.2006.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of this paper is to estimate the output elasticity of foreign direct investment (FDI) and imports in Thailand and in the Philippines during the period 1970–1998. Applying a CES generalization of Cobb-Douglas production function, the output response to FDI is the same in both countries, but imports affect Thailand more than the Philippines. The FDI contribution to every one percentage growth point is about 0.05 of a percentage point in each country where imports contribute about 0.47 of a percentage point in Thailand and 0.31 of a percentage point in the Philippines. As a result, the foreign investment and imports contribute about 52 percent of every one percentage growth point in Thailand compared to a lower 36 percent in the Philippines. The remaining effects on the economic growth are from labor and domestic investment. Both countries are labor intensive, but the impact of labor is more significant in the Philippines. The Philippine economy is also more domestic capital intensive than the Thai economy. Furthermore, the FDI path shows that the effect of foreign investment is more pronounced in the Philippines during the second half of the 1990s, whereas the imports are more effective in Thailand since 1994. Therefore, the Philippine economy could gain more from directing its economic policies to further liberalize its foreign investments. The Thai economy, on the other hand, should continue its reliance on imported foreign technology in order to accelerate its economic growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Of Developing Areas\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JDA.2006.0002\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Of Developing Areas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/JDA.2006.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Developing Areas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JDA.2006.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

本文的主要目的是估计1970-1998年期间泰国和菲律宾的外国直接投资(FDI)和进口的产出弹性。应用Cobb-Douglas生产函数的CES泛化,两国对外国直接投资的产出反应相同,但进口对泰国的影响大于对菲律宾的影响。外国直接投资对每个国家增长1个百分点的贡献约为0.05个百分点,而进口对泰国和菲律宾的贡献分别为0.47和0.31个百分点。因此,外国投资和进口对泰国经济每增长1个百分点的贡献约为52%,而菲律宾的这一比例较低,为36%。对经济增长的剩余影响来自劳动力和国内投资。这两个国家都是劳动密集型国家,但劳动力的影响在菲律宾更为显著。菲律宾经济也比泰国经济更加依赖国内资本。此外,外国直接投资路径表明,外国投资的影响在1990年代后半期在菲律宾更为明显,而自1994年以来进口在泰国更为有效。因此,菲律宾经济可以通过指导其经济政策进一步开放其外国投资而获得更多收益。另一方面,泰国经济应继续依赖进口外国技术,以加速其经济增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment And Imports on Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis of Thailand and the Philippines (1970-1998)
The main objective of this paper is to estimate the output elasticity of foreign direct investment (FDI) and imports in Thailand and in the Philippines during the period 1970–1998. Applying a CES generalization of Cobb-Douglas production function, the output response to FDI is the same in both countries, but imports affect Thailand more than the Philippines. The FDI contribution to every one percentage growth point is about 0.05 of a percentage point in each country where imports contribute about 0.47 of a percentage point in Thailand and 0.31 of a percentage point in the Philippines. As a result, the foreign investment and imports contribute about 52 percent of every one percentage growth point in Thailand compared to a lower 36 percent in the Philippines. The remaining effects on the economic growth are from labor and domestic investment. Both countries are labor intensive, but the impact of labor is more significant in the Philippines. The Philippine economy is also more domestic capital intensive than the Thai economy. Furthermore, the FDI path shows that the effect of foreign investment is more pronounced in the Philippines during the second half of the 1990s, whereas the imports are more effective in Thailand since 1994. Therefore, the Philippine economy could gain more from directing its economic policies to further liberalize its foreign investments. The Thai economy, on the other hand, should continue its reliance on imported foreign technology in order to accelerate its economic growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Earnings Announcement and Stock Prices of Quoted Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic Revisiting the Exchange Rate -Oil Price Nexus in Turbulent Period: What Can We Learn From Nigeria and South Africa During Covid-19? Trade Implications on Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIS) Due to COVID-19 Pandemic and India China Altercation Analysis of Non-Oil Exports – Economic Growth Relationship in Nigeria: The Role of Institutional Qualities Who are the Poor Farm households' in Nigeria and is this Population Changing Over Time?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1