钢质抗弯矩框架及SDOF体系易损性曲线的准确性

IF 4 3区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Steel and Composite Structures Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.12989/SCS.2021.39.3.243
S. Yaghmaei‐Sabegh, A. Jafari, M. Eghbali
{"title":"钢质抗弯矩框架及SDOF体系易损性曲线的准确性","authors":"S. Yaghmaei‐Sabegh, A. Jafari, M. Eghbali","doi":"10.12989/SCS.2021.39.3.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present paper, a Monte Carlo-based framework is developed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of analytical fragility curves of steel moment-resisting frames and simple SDOF systems. It is also studied how the effectiveness of incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) and multiple stripes analysis (MSA) approaches, as two common nonlinear dynamic analysis methods, are influenced by the number of records and analysis stripes in fragility curves producing. Results showed that the simple SDOF systems do not provide accurate and reliable fragility curves compared with realistic steel moment-resisting structures. It is demonstrated that, the effectiveness of nonlinear dynamic analysis approaches is dependent on the fundamental period of structures, where in short-period structures, IDA is found to be more effective approach compared with MSA. This difference between the effectiveness of two analysis approaches decreases as the fundamental period of structures become longer. Using of 2 or 3 analysis stripes in MSA approach leads to significant inaccuracy and unreliability in the estimated fragility curves. Additionally, 15 number of ground motion records is recommended as a threshold of significant unreliability in estimated fragility curves, constructed by MSA.","PeriodicalId":51177,"journal":{"name":"Steel and Composite Structures","volume":"9 1","pages":"243"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The accuracy of fragility curves of the steel moment-resisting frames and SDOF systems\",\"authors\":\"S. Yaghmaei‐Sabegh, A. Jafari, M. Eghbali\",\"doi\":\"10.12989/SCS.2021.39.3.243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present paper, a Monte Carlo-based framework is developed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of analytical fragility curves of steel moment-resisting frames and simple SDOF systems. It is also studied how the effectiveness of incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) and multiple stripes analysis (MSA) approaches, as two common nonlinear dynamic analysis methods, are influenced by the number of records and analysis stripes in fragility curves producing. Results showed that the simple SDOF systems do not provide accurate and reliable fragility curves compared with realistic steel moment-resisting structures. It is demonstrated that, the effectiveness of nonlinear dynamic analysis approaches is dependent on the fundamental period of structures, where in short-period structures, IDA is found to be more effective approach compared with MSA. This difference between the effectiveness of two analysis approaches decreases as the fundamental period of structures become longer. Using of 2 or 3 analysis stripes in MSA approach leads to significant inaccuracy and unreliability in the estimated fragility curves. Additionally, 15 number of ground motion records is recommended as a threshold of significant unreliability in estimated fragility curves, constructed by MSA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Steel and Composite Structures\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Steel and Composite Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12989/SCS.2021.39.3.243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Steel and Composite Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/SCS.2021.39.3.243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文建立了基于蒙特卡罗的框架,研究了钢抗弯矩框架和简单SDOF体系分析脆性曲线的准确性和可靠性。研究了增量动态分析(IDA)和多条纹分析(MSA)两种常用的非线性动态分析方法在脆性曲线生成过程中记录数和分析条纹数对其有效性的影响。结果表明,与实际的钢结构抗弯矩结构相比,简单的SDOF体系不能提供准确可靠的脆性曲线。结果表明,非线性动力分析方法的有效性取决于结构的基本周期,在短周期结构中,IDA方法比MSA方法更有效。两种分析方法的有效性差异随着结构基本周期的延长而减小。在MSA方法中使用2条或3条分析条纹会导致估计脆性曲线的严重不准确和不可靠。此外,在MSA构建的估计易碎性曲线中,建议将15条地震动记录作为显著不可靠的阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The accuracy of fragility curves of the steel moment-resisting frames and SDOF systems
In the present paper, a Monte Carlo-based framework is developed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of analytical fragility curves of steel moment-resisting frames and simple SDOF systems. It is also studied how the effectiveness of incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) and multiple stripes analysis (MSA) approaches, as two common nonlinear dynamic analysis methods, are influenced by the number of records and analysis stripes in fragility curves producing. Results showed that the simple SDOF systems do not provide accurate and reliable fragility curves compared with realistic steel moment-resisting structures. It is demonstrated that, the effectiveness of nonlinear dynamic analysis approaches is dependent on the fundamental period of structures, where in short-period structures, IDA is found to be more effective approach compared with MSA. This difference between the effectiveness of two analysis approaches decreases as the fundamental period of structures become longer. Using of 2 or 3 analysis stripes in MSA approach leads to significant inaccuracy and unreliability in the estimated fragility curves. Additionally, 15 number of ground motion records is recommended as a threshold of significant unreliability in estimated fragility curves, constructed by MSA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Steel and Composite Structures
Steel and Composite Structures 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
19.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Steel & Composite Structures, An International Journal, provides and excellent publication channel which reports the up-to-date research developments in the steel structures and steel-concrete composite structures, and FRP plated structures from the international steel community. The research results reported in this journal address all the aspects of theoretical and experimental research, including Buckling/Stability, Fatigue/Fracture, Fire Performance, Connections, Frames/Bridges, Plates/Shells, Composite Structural Components, Hybrid Structures, Fabrication/Maintenance, Design Codes, Dynamics/Vibrations, Nonferrous Metal Structures, Non-metalic plates, Analytical Methods. The Journal specially wishes to bridge the gap between the theoretical developments and practical applications for the benefits of both academic researchers and practicing engineers. In this light, contributions from the practicing engineers are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Integrated data-driven cross-disciplinary framework to prevent chemical water pollution. Study on the mechanism of the vortex-induced vibration ofa bluff double-side box section New composite flooring system for the circular economy Axial behavior of the steel reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete (SRLAC) short columns Dual-phase-lag model on thermo-microstretch elastic solid Under the effect of initial stress and temperature-dependent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1