在日常生活中理解和衡量算法治理的指南

IF 3.6 Q1 COMMUNICATION Internet Policy Review Pub Date : 2019-06-30 DOI:10.14763/2019.2.1415
M. Latzer, Noemi Festic
{"title":"在日常生活中理解和衡量算法治理的指南","authors":"M. Latzer, Noemi Festic","doi":"10.14763/2019.2.1415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithmic governance affects individuals’ reality construction and consequently social order in societies. Vague concepts of algorithmic governance and the lack of comprehensive empirical insights into this kind of institutional steering by software from a user perspective may, however, lead to unrealistic risk assessments and premature policy conclusions. Therefore, this paper offers a theoretical model to measure the significance of algorithmic governance and an empirical mixed-methods approach to test it in different life domains. Applying this guideline should lead to a more nuanced understanding of the actual significance of algorithmic governance, thus contributing to an empirically better-informed risk assessment and governance of algorithms.","PeriodicalId":45799,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A guideline for understanding and measuring algorithmic governance in everyday life\",\"authors\":\"M. Latzer, Noemi Festic\",\"doi\":\"10.14763/2019.2.1415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Algorithmic governance affects individuals’ reality construction and consequently social order in societies. Vague concepts of algorithmic governance and the lack of comprehensive empirical insights into this kind of institutional steering by software from a user perspective may, however, lead to unrealistic risk assessments and premature policy conclusions. Therefore, this paper offers a theoretical model to measure the significance of algorithmic governance and an empirical mixed-methods approach to test it in different life domains. Applying this guideline should lead to a more nuanced understanding of the actual significance of algorithmic governance, thus contributing to an empirically better-informed risk assessment and governance of algorithms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

算法治理影响个人的现实建构,进而影响社会秩序。然而,算法治理的模糊概念和缺乏从用户角度对这种由软件进行的制度指导的全面经验见解可能导致不切实际的风险评估和过早的政策结论。因此,本文提出了一个理论模型来衡量算法治理的重要性,并提出了一种实证混合方法来检验它在不同生活领域的重要性。应用这一指导方针应该导致对算法治理的实际意义有更细致的理解,从而有助于在经验上更好地了解算法的风险评估和治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A guideline for understanding and measuring algorithmic governance in everyday life
Algorithmic governance affects individuals’ reality construction and consequently social order in societies. Vague concepts of algorithmic governance and the lack of comprehensive empirical insights into this kind of institutional steering by software from a user perspective may, however, lead to unrealistic risk assessments and premature policy conclusions. Therefore, this paper offers a theoretical model to measure the significance of algorithmic governance and an empirical mixed-methods approach to test it in different life domains. Applying this guideline should lead to a more nuanced understanding of the actual significance of algorithmic governance, thus contributing to an empirically better-informed risk assessment and governance of algorithms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
30
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Government responses to online disinformation unpacked Navigating the AI frontier: European parliamentary insights on bias and regulation, preceding the AI Act Regulatory capacity capture: the United Kingdom’s online safety regime A complicated picture: Media diversity in the case of Google’s video search during the pandemic Dis/Trust and data-driven technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1