城市尊严-全球尊严:什么是尊严?我们如何实现它?(第1部分)

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Urban Culture Research Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI:10.14456/JUCR.2014.11
E. Lindner
{"title":"城市尊严-全球尊严:什么是尊严?我们如何实现它?(第1部分)","authors":"E. Lindner","doi":"10.14456/JUCR.2014.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unity in diversity is at the centre of dignity. It means that people of all classes and colors intermingle in a spirit of mutual care and respect. Traditionally, throughout the past millennia, uniformity in division has been practised almost everywhereon the planet: to strengthen their competitive advantage over enemy out-groups, in-groups maintained a strictly unequal domination of higher beings over lesser beings. Unity in diversity is a more complex concept as it requires the readiness and ability to consider everyone else as equal in dignity, and it calls for the skills to enter into dialogue with equals. As long as such a culture is not yet established, unity in diversity has the potential to trigger uneasiness, including feelings of humiliation, and can lead to attempts to cleanse and exclude diversity so asto return to the more familiar and less complex experience of uniformity in division. Urban contexts are prime experimental laboratories for this transition. For urban dignity to flourish and social and ecological sustainability to emerge, interdisciplinary dialogue is needed to overcome the traditional practise of domination over people and over nature. Urban dignity flourishes when the city is regarded in terms of a family that collaborates in mutual communal sharing and stewardship of their environment, while urban dignity collapses when priority is given to clambering for power and status, be it through overt oppression or cloaked as economic necessity. Artists can play a central role in creating conditions for social interactions of dignity instead of humiliation. Music, for instance, has the power to unite. One example was given by Oslo citizens when they reacted to the 22 July 2011 terror attacks in Norway by gathering in front of the courthouse singing ‘The Rainbow People.’","PeriodicalId":40637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Culture Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"8-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban Dignity – Global Dignity: What Is It? How Do We Achieve It? (Part 1)\",\"authors\":\"E. Lindner\",\"doi\":\"10.14456/JUCR.2014.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unity in diversity is at the centre of dignity. It means that people of all classes and colors intermingle in a spirit of mutual care and respect. Traditionally, throughout the past millennia, uniformity in division has been practised almost everywhereon the planet: to strengthen their competitive advantage over enemy out-groups, in-groups maintained a strictly unequal domination of higher beings over lesser beings. Unity in diversity is a more complex concept as it requires the readiness and ability to consider everyone else as equal in dignity, and it calls for the skills to enter into dialogue with equals. As long as such a culture is not yet established, unity in diversity has the potential to trigger uneasiness, including feelings of humiliation, and can lead to attempts to cleanse and exclude diversity so asto return to the more familiar and less complex experience of uniformity in division. Urban contexts are prime experimental laboratories for this transition. For urban dignity to flourish and social and ecological sustainability to emerge, interdisciplinary dialogue is needed to overcome the traditional practise of domination over people and over nature. Urban dignity flourishes when the city is regarded in terms of a family that collaborates in mutual communal sharing and stewardship of their environment, while urban dignity collapses when priority is given to clambering for power and status, be it through overt oppression or cloaked as economic necessity. Artists can play a central role in creating conditions for social interactions of dignity instead of humiliation. Music, for instance, has the power to unite. One example was given by Oslo citizens when they reacted to the 22 July 2011 terror attacks in Norway by gathering in front of the courthouse singing ‘The Rainbow People.’\",\"PeriodicalId\":40637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Culture Research\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"8-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Culture Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14456/JUCR.2014.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Culture Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14456/JUCR.2014.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多样性中的统一是尊严的核心。这意味着所有阶级和肤色的人都以相互关心和尊重的精神生活在一起。传统上,在过去的几千年里,地球上几乎每个地方都实行统一的划分:为了加强他们对敌人外群体的竞争优势,内群体保持着严格不平等的高等生物对低等生物的统治。多样性中的统一是一个更为复杂的概念,因为它要求人们准备好并有能力将其他所有人视为有平等尊严的人,它要求人们具备与平等的人进行对话的技能。只要这种文化尚未建立,多样性中的统一就有可能引发不安,包括屈辱感,并可能导致试图净化和排除多样性,以便回到更熟悉和不那么复杂的分裂中的统一体验。城市环境是这种转变的主要实验实验室。为了使城市尊严蓬勃发展,实现社会和生态的可持续性,需要进行跨学科的对话,以克服对人和自然的传统统治。当城市被视为一个家庭,在相互共享和管理环境方面进行合作时,城市的尊严就会蓬勃发展,而当优先考虑对权力和地位的争夺时,城市的尊严就会崩溃,无论是通过公开的压迫还是以经济需要为幌子。艺术家可以在创造尊严而不是羞辱的社会互动条件方面发挥核心作用。例如,音乐具有团结的力量。奥斯陆市民举了一个例子,他们在2011年7月22日挪威发生恐怖袭击后,聚集在法院前高唱“彩虹人民”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urban Dignity – Global Dignity: What Is It? How Do We Achieve It? (Part 1)
Unity in diversity is at the centre of dignity. It means that people of all classes and colors intermingle in a spirit of mutual care and respect. Traditionally, throughout the past millennia, uniformity in division has been practised almost everywhereon the planet: to strengthen their competitive advantage over enemy out-groups, in-groups maintained a strictly unequal domination of higher beings over lesser beings. Unity in diversity is a more complex concept as it requires the readiness and ability to consider everyone else as equal in dignity, and it calls for the skills to enter into dialogue with equals. As long as such a culture is not yet established, unity in diversity has the potential to trigger uneasiness, including feelings of humiliation, and can lead to attempts to cleanse and exclude diversity so asto return to the more familiar and less complex experience of uniformity in division. Urban contexts are prime experimental laboratories for this transition. For urban dignity to flourish and social and ecological sustainability to emerge, interdisciplinary dialogue is needed to overcome the traditional practise of domination over people and over nature. Urban dignity flourishes when the city is regarded in terms of a family that collaborates in mutual communal sharing and stewardship of their environment, while urban dignity collapses when priority is given to clambering for power and status, be it through overt oppression or cloaked as economic necessity. Artists can play a central role in creating conditions for social interactions of dignity instead of humiliation. Music, for instance, has the power to unite. One example was given by Oslo citizens when they reacted to the 22 July 2011 terror attacks in Norway by gathering in front of the courthouse singing ‘The Rainbow People.’
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Culture Research
Journal of Urban Culture Research HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technology singularity culture: In the Urgency of the problem in the COVID-19 pandemic Revealing the history of parakan: Through the architectural heritage of Kauman Parakan, Central Java, Indonesia Cultural Influences Affecting Dance Values: A Case Study of Thailand and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic Implications of the Urban Landscape: Aspects of the Isan Cultural Maintenance and Revitalization Program Myanmar’s Rohingya: Human Rights Abuses and Systemic Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1