uexk和怀特海在意义、过程和生命方面的观点

IF 1 1区 文学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Sign Systems Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.11
Arthur Araujo
{"title":"uexk<e:1>和怀特海在意义、过程和生命方面的观点","authors":"Arthur Araujo","doi":"10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper approximates Jakob von Uexküll’s theory of meaning and the process-thought in Alfred Whitehead’s philosophy. As the main idea, the paper points at the compatibility of meaning and process according to the perspectives of Uexküll and Whitehead. It suggests that Uexküll’s common meaning rule can describe the processes of novelty in the world as does Whitehead’s principle of creativity. It is also suggested that Uexküll and Whitehead abandon a substantialist view of the organism – the organism means much more process, activity and creation than anything thing-like. In approaching Uexküll’s theory of meaning, a semiotic interpretation of Whitehead’s principle of creativity is proposed in which the concept of the threshold is fundamental to defining the boundary between the semiotic and the non-semiotic areas corresponding to the living (animate) and the non-living (inanimate). In conclusion, the paper suggests that the activity of meaning distinguishes animate entities from inanimate ones in the sense that meaning and life overlap – meaning could not have existed prior to life (and to the contrary).","PeriodicalId":44467,"journal":{"name":"Sign Systems Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"415-449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uexküll and Whitehead on meaning, process and life\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Araujo\",\"doi\":\"10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper approximates Jakob von Uexküll’s theory of meaning and the process-thought in Alfred Whitehead’s philosophy. As the main idea, the paper points at the compatibility of meaning and process according to the perspectives of Uexküll and Whitehead. It suggests that Uexküll’s common meaning rule can describe the processes of novelty in the world as does Whitehead’s principle of creativity. It is also suggested that Uexküll and Whitehead abandon a substantialist view of the organism – the organism means much more process, activity and creation than anything thing-like. In approaching Uexküll’s theory of meaning, a semiotic interpretation of Whitehead’s principle of creativity is proposed in which the concept of the threshold is fundamental to defining the boundary between the semiotic and the non-semiotic areas corresponding to the living (animate) and the non-living (inanimate). In conclusion, the paper suggests that the activity of meaning distinguishes animate entities from inanimate ones in the sense that meaning and life overlap – meaning could not have existed prior to life (and to the contrary).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sign Systems Studies\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"415-449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sign Systems Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.11\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Systems Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.11","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对尤克斯科的意义理论和怀特黑德哲学中的过程思想进行了探讨。本文主要从uexk和Whitehead的观点出发,指出了意义与过程的相容性。这表明,uexk的共同意义规则可以描述世界上的新颖性过程,就像怀特黑德的创造力原则一样。也有人建议uexk和怀特黑德放弃对有机体的实体主义观点——有机体比任何类似的东西更多地意味着过程、活动和创造。在接近uexk的意义理论时,提出了对怀特海创造力原则的符号学解释,其中阈值的概念是定义符号学和非符号学区域之间边界的基础,对应于生命(有生命)和非生命(无生命)。综上所述,本文认为意义的活动在意义和生命重叠的意义上区分了有生命的实体和无生命的实体——意义不可能在生命之前就存在(反之亦然)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uexküll and Whitehead on meaning, process and life
The paper approximates Jakob von Uexküll’s theory of meaning and the process-thought in Alfred Whitehead’s philosophy. As the main idea, the paper points at the compatibility of meaning and process according to the perspectives of Uexküll and Whitehead. It suggests that Uexküll’s common meaning rule can describe the processes of novelty in the world as does Whitehead’s principle of creativity. It is also suggested that Uexküll and Whitehead abandon a substantialist view of the organism – the organism means much more process, activity and creation than anything thing-like. In approaching Uexküll’s theory of meaning, a semiotic interpretation of Whitehead’s principle of creativity is proposed in which the concept of the threshold is fundamental to defining the boundary between the semiotic and the non-semiotic areas corresponding to the living (animate) and the non-living (inanimate). In conclusion, the paper suggests that the activity of meaning distinguishes animate entities from inanimate ones in the sense that meaning and life overlap – meaning could not have existed prior to life (and to the contrary).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sign Systems Studies
Sign Systems Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Meaning-generating mechanisms and the semiosphere: Towards the semiotics of modern apocrypha Bulgarian culture and space in the religious context Considerations about the ‘right to a biography’: Saints and intellectuals in contemporary culture On binary opposition and binarism: A long-distance dialogue between decolonial critique and the Lotmanian semiotics Beneath Thy Protection: Portrait of the Holy Virgin as a semantic operator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1