“欧洲堡垒”中的葡萄牙新庇护法

A. Barradas
{"title":"“欧洲堡垒”中的葡萄牙新庇护法","authors":"A. Barradas","doi":"10.1504/ijmbs.2019.10027302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will analyse the 2013 revision of the Portuguese Asylum Law due to the need to harmonise national law with the European Union (EU) 'Dublin Regulation'. The government1 stated the need to harmonise national law with EU Directives related to the Common European Asylum System and several legal changes took place as a consequence. The non-refoulement principle will be approached, namely, the possibility of sending back asylum seekers to their countries of origin while awaiting a decision on their request for international protection. The fact that the new law broadened detention to more situations will also be considered. Some of the reasons why these changes occurred will be explored within the context of refugee issues and International Human Rights Law.","PeriodicalId":90549,"journal":{"name":"International journal of migration and border studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The new Portuguese asylum law in 'fortress Europe'\",\"authors\":\"A. Barradas\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijmbs.2019.10027302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper will analyse the 2013 revision of the Portuguese Asylum Law due to the need to harmonise national law with the European Union (EU) 'Dublin Regulation'. The government1 stated the need to harmonise national law with EU Directives related to the Common European Asylum System and several legal changes took place as a consequence. The non-refoulement principle will be approached, namely, the possibility of sending back asylum seekers to their countries of origin while awaiting a decision on their request for international protection. The fact that the new law broadened detention to more situations will also be considered. Some of the reasons why these changes occurred will be explored within the context of refugee issues and International Human Rights Law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of migration and border studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of migration and border studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmbs.2019.10027302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of migration and border studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmbs.2019.10027302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将分析2013年葡萄牙庇护法的修订,因为需要与欧盟(EU)协调国家法律。“都柏林监管”。政府1表示有必要使国家法律与欧盟有关欧洲共同庇护制度的指令相协调,因此发生了几项法律变化。将探讨不驱回原则,即在等待对其国际保护请求作出决定的同时,将寻求庇护者送回原籍国的可能性。新的法律将拘留扩大到更多的情况,这一事实也将得到考虑。发生这些变化的一些原因将在难民问题和国际人权法的背景下进行探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The new Portuguese asylum law in 'fortress Europe'
This paper will analyse the 2013 revision of the Portuguese Asylum Law due to the need to harmonise national law with the European Union (EU) 'Dublin Regulation'. The government1 stated the need to harmonise national law with EU Directives related to the Common European Asylum System and several legal changes took place as a consequence. The non-refoulement principle will be approached, namely, the possibility of sending back asylum seekers to their countries of origin while awaiting a decision on their request for international protection. The fact that the new law broadened detention to more situations will also be considered. Some of the reasons why these changes occurred will be explored within the context of refugee issues and International Human Rights Law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positioning processes and dissent among Colombian migrants in Australia Imposed dehumanised realities: crisis biopolitics at Lesvos border camps in the pandemic era of COVID-19 Bordering through legal non-existence: the production of de facto statelessness among women and children through the National Registry of Citizens in Assam, India Narratives from non-citizen former youth in child welfare care fighting crimmigration and deportation Local variations in integration policies: experiences from the perspectives of immigrants in Sweden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1