“没有肉体就没有精神”:约翰·加尔文的希腊福异象教义

Steven W. Tyra
{"title":"“没有肉体就没有精神”:约翰·加尔文的希腊福异象教义","authors":"Steven W. Tyra","doi":"10.14315/arg-2020-1110108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“According to the error of the Greeks and the Calvinists, the [departed soul] has not gone to God, but to the lower world, or to some other place outside heaven where God is not any more present than he is here with us.”1 With this statement, the Jesuit polemicist, Robert Bellarmine, summed up what he considered one of Reformed Protestantism’s chief heresies in the sixteenth century. The Calvinists were preaching that, upon death, faithful souls did not immediately ascend to God and enjoy the “beatific vision” as was the traditional hope of late medieval Christians. Rather, they migrated to “some other place” where they rested until the last judgment and resurrection. Only then would they enjoy the fullness of beatitude and behold God “face to face.” Bellarmine had no doubt who was to blame for this false teaching in his own day. “[John] Calvin stubbornly defends the notion that souls do not see God [animas non videre Deum]” before the last day, he warned.2 The Genevan heresiarch had drunk from a polluted stream whose headwaters lay to the East. The error of the Calvinists was that of the Greeks. However familiar Calvin’s Greek sensibility was to near contemporaries like Bellarmine, it is likely to surprise modern scholars. The most complete treatments of the reformer’s eschatology remain those of Heinrich Quistorp (1941) and George H. Tavard (2000).3 Despite their different eras and aims, these studies agree in casting Calvin as a “traditional” voice regarding the visio Dei","PeriodicalId":42621,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY","volume":"20 1","pages":"170 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Neither the Spirit Without the Flesh”: John Calvin’s Greek Doctrine of the Beatific Vision\",\"authors\":\"Steven W. Tyra\",\"doi\":\"10.14315/arg-2020-1110108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“According to the error of the Greeks and the Calvinists, the [departed soul] has not gone to God, but to the lower world, or to some other place outside heaven where God is not any more present than he is here with us.”1 With this statement, the Jesuit polemicist, Robert Bellarmine, summed up what he considered one of Reformed Protestantism’s chief heresies in the sixteenth century. The Calvinists were preaching that, upon death, faithful souls did not immediately ascend to God and enjoy the “beatific vision” as was the traditional hope of late medieval Christians. Rather, they migrated to “some other place” where they rested until the last judgment and resurrection. Only then would they enjoy the fullness of beatitude and behold God “face to face.” Bellarmine had no doubt who was to blame for this false teaching in his own day. “[John] Calvin stubbornly defends the notion that souls do not see God [animas non videre Deum]” before the last day, he warned.2 The Genevan heresiarch had drunk from a polluted stream whose headwaters lay to the East. The error of the Calvinists was that of the Greeks. However familiar Calvin’s Greek sensibility was to near contemporaries like Bellarmine, it is likely to surprise modern scholars. The most complete treatments of the reformer’s eschatology remain those of Heinrich Quistorp (1941) and George H. Tavard (2000).3 Despite their different eras and aims, these studies agree in casting Calvin as a “traditional” voice regarding the visio Dei\",\"PeriodicalId\":42621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"170 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14315/arg-2020-1110108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIV FUR REFORMATIONSGESCHICHTE-ARCHIVE FOR REFORMATION HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14315/arg-2020-1110108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

“根据希腊人和加尔文主义者的错误,[离开的灵魂]并没有去上帝那里,而是去了更低的世界,或者去了天堂以外的某个地方,在那里上帝不再像他在这里与我们同在一样。1耶稣会辩论家罗伯特·贝拉明(Robert Bellarmine)用这句话总结了他认为是16世纪改革宗主要异端之一的观点。加尔文主义者宣扬,死后,忠诚的灵魂不会立即升天到上帝那里,享受“幸福的景象”,这是中世纪晚期基督徒的传统希望。相反,他们迁移到“另一个地方”,在那里休息,直到最后的审判和复活。只有这样,他们才能享受完全的喜乐,并“面对面”地与神相遇。贝拉明毫不怀疑,在他那个时代,谁应该为这种错误的教导负责。他警告说:“(约翰)加尔文固执地捍卫灵魂在末日之前看不到上帝的观念。这位日内瓦的学者喝的是一条源头往东的被污染的小溪的水。加尔文主义者的错误就是希腊人的错误。无论加尔文对希腊的感知力对贝拉明这样的近代人来说多么熟悉,它可能会让现代学者感到惊讶。最完整的处理改革者的末世论仍然是海因里希奎斯托普(1941)和乔治H.塔瓦德(2000)尽管他们的时代和目标不同,但这些研究一致认为加尔文是关于上帝异象的“传统”声音
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Neither the Spirit Without the Flesh”: John Calvin’s Greek Doctrine of the Beatific Vision
“According to the error of the Greeks and the Calvinists, the [departed soul] has not gone to God, but to the lower world, or to some other place outside heaven where God is not any more present than he is here with us.”1 With this statement, the Jesuit polemicist, Robert Bellarmine, summed up what he considered one of Reformed Protestantism’s chief heresies in the sixteenth century. The Calvinists were preaching that, upon death, faithful souls did not immediately ascend to God and enjoy the “beatific vision” as was the traditional hope of late medieval Christians. Rather, they migrated to “some other place” where they rested until the last judgment and resurrection. Only then would they enjoy the fullness of beatitude and behold God “face to face.” Bellarmine had no doubt who was to blame for this false teaching in his own day. “[John] Calvin stubbornly defends the notion that souls do not see God [animas non videre Deum]” before the last day, he warned.2 The Genevan heresiarch had drunk from a polluted stream whose headwaters lay to the East. The error of the Calvinists was that of the Greeks. However familiar Calvin’s Greek sensibility was to near contemporaries like Bellarmine, it is likely to surprise modern scholars. The most complete treatments of the reformer’s eschatology remain those of Heinrich Quistorp (1941) and George H. Tavard (2000).3 Despite their different eras and aims, these studies agree in casting Calvin as a “traditional” voice regarding the visio Dei
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medicine and Healing in Martin Luther’s Thought Die Vermessung der Arche Noah. Mosaische Physik im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert Historia Persecutionum Ecclesiae Bohemicae between History, Identity, and Martyrology Inhalt The Early Salvation Theology of Juan de Valdés: Luther Once Again
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1