横截面相关面板数据中无单位根的局部最优检验

IF 0.2 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2011-12-01 DOI:10.15057/22026
K. Hadri, Eiji Kurozumi
{"title":"横截面相关面板数据中无单位根的局部最优检验","authors":"K. Hadri, Eiji Kurozumi","doi":"10.15057/22026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops a simple test for the null hypothesis of no unit root for panel data with cross-sectional dependence in the form of a common factor in the disturbance. We do not estimate the common factor but mop-up its effect by employing the same method as the one proposed in Pesaran (2007) in the unit root testing context. We show that our test is asymptotically locally optimal, although the optimality is not guaranteed under a wide range of the alternative.","PeriodicalId":43705,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics","volume":"52 1","pages":"165-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A LOCALLY OPTIMAL TEST FOR NO UNIT ROOT IN CROSS-SECTIONALLY DEPENDENT PANEL DATA*\",\"authors\":\"K. Hadri, Eiji Kurozumi\",\"doi\":\"10.15057/22026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper develops a simple test for the null hypothesis of no unit root for panel data with cross-sectional dependence in the form of a common factor in the disturbance. We do not estimate the common factor but mop-up its effect by employing the same method as the one proposed in Pesaran (2007) in the unit root testing context. We show that our test is asymptotically locally optimal, although the optimality is not guaranteed under a wide range of the alternative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"165-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15057/22026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/22026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

本文发展了一个简单的检验无单位根的面板数据的零假设的横截面依赖形式的共同因素的干扰。我们不估计共同因素,而是通过采用与Pesaran(2007)在单位根测试环境中提出的方法相同的方法来消除其影响。我们证明了我们的测试是渐近局部最优的,尽管在广泛的备选方案下不能保证最优性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A LOCALLY OPTIMAL TEST FOR NO UNIT ROOT IN CROSS-SECTIONALLY DEPENDENT PANEL DATA*
This paper develops a simple test for the null hypothesis of no unit root for panel data with cross-sectional dependence in the form of a common factor in the disturbance. We do not estimate the common factor but mop-up its effect by employing the same method as the one proposed in Pesaran (2007) in the unit root testing context. We show that our test is asymptotically locally optimal, although the optimality is not guaranteed under a wide range of the alternative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Floating population and demand for movie theaters in metropolitan cities Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Duopoly with Vertically Related Markets Impact of Outgrower Scheme on Yield,Output Price,and Income: A Rice-Farm-Level Study in the Mekong Delta,Vietnam Business Services,Trade,and Research Intensity Religion and Corporate Disclosure Quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1