软件辅助谐波函数判别

V. J. Manzo
{"title":"软件辅助谐波函数判别","authors":"V. J. Manzo","doi":"10.1386/JMTE.7.1.23_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining the function of chords within a diatonic key can be difficult, especially for those listeners who do not regularly play instruments capable of producing chords. Software-based instruments, however, can allow an individual to play chords by pressing a single button as opposed to plucking several strings or pressing several keys. This quantitative study addressed two research questions: to what extent is a software-based musical instrument able to assist individuals in recognizing chord-contexts to the extent that traditional chordal instruments do? In what ways does a software-based musical instrument compare to a traditional chordal instrument as a viable aid for assisting individuals in chord-determination activities? In this Pre-/Post-test designed study, two groups of undergraduate music majors using either a chordal instrument or a softwareinstrument completed activities that emphasized understanding chord progressions. Results were compared within the groups and between groups. Both groups improved to some extent and there was no significant difference between the improvements within both groups overall, suggesting that the software instrument was as viable a mechanism for supporting the musical task as the traditional instrument. Additionally, the data suggest that the ability to recognize two of the five progressions, the vi IV I V and the I V vi IV, improved significantly in the experimental group but not in the control group.","PeriodicalId":42410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Technology & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1386/JMTE.7.1.23_1","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software-assisted harmonic function discrimination\",\"authors\":\"V. J. Manzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/JMTE.7.1.23_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Determining the function of chords within a diatonic key can be difficult, especially for those listeners who do not regularly play instruments capable of producing chords. Software-based instruments, however, can allow an individual to play chords by pressing a single button as opposed to plucking several strings or pressing several keys. This quantitative study addressed two research questions: to what extent is a software-based musical instrument able to assist individuals in recognizing chord-contexts to the extent that traditional chordal instruments do? In what ways does a software-based musical instrument compare to a traditional chordal instrument as a viable aid for assisting individuals in chord-determination activities? In this Pre-/Post-test designed study, two groups of undergraduate music majors using either a chordal instrument or a softwareinstrument completed activities that emphasized understanding chord progressions. Results were compared within the groups and between groups. Both groups improved to some extent and there was no significant difference between the improvements within both groups overall, suggesting that the software instrument was as viable a mechanism for supporting the musical task as the traditional instrument. Additionally, the data suggest that the ability to recognize two of the five progressions, the vi IV I V and the I V vi IV, improved significantly in the experimental group but not in the control group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Music Technology & Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1386/JMTE.7.1.23_1\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Music Technology & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/JMTE.7.1.23_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Technology & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JMTE.7.1.23_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

确定全音阶中和弦的功能是很困难的,特别是对于那些不经常演奏能够产生和弦的乐器的听众。然而,基于软件的乐器可以允许个人通过按一个按钮来演奏和弦,而不是拨动几根弦或按几个键。这项定量研究解决了两个研究问题:在多大程度上,基于软件的乐器能够帮助个人识别和弦上下文,达到传统和弦乐器的程度?软件乐器与传统和弦乐器相比,在帮助个人确定和弦活动方面有哪些可行的帮助?在这项前/后测试设计的研究中,两组音乐专业的本科生使用和弦乐器或软件乐器完成强调理解和弦进行的活动。比较组内及组间结果。两组都在一定程度上有所改善,两组整体上的改善没有显著差异,这表明软件乐器与传统乐器一样是支持音乐任务的可行机制。此外,数据表明,识别五种进展中的两种,即vi IV IV和IV vi IV的能力在实验组显著提高,而在对照组则没有提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Software-assisted harmonic function discrimination
Determining the function of chords within a diatonic key can be difficult, especially for those listeners who do not regularly play instruments capable of producing chords. Software-based instruments, however, can allow an individual to play chords by pressing a single button as opposed to plucking several strings or pressing several keys. This quantitative study addressed two research questions: to what extent is a software-based musical instrument able to assist individuals in recognizing chord-contexts to the extent that traditional chordal instruments do? In what ways does a software-based musical instrument compare to a traditional chordal instrument as a viable aid for assisting individuals in chord-determination activities? In this Pre-/Post-test designed study, two groups of undergraduate music majors using either a chordal instrument or a softwareinstrument completed activities that emphasized understanding chord progressions. Results were compared within the groups and between groups. Both groups improved to some extent and there was no significant difference between the improvements within both groups overall, suggesting that the software instrument was as viable a mechanism for supporting the musical task as the traditional instrument. Additionally, the data suggest that the ability to recognize two of the five progressions, the vi IV I V and the I V vi IV, improved significantly in the experimental group but not in the control group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Design principles for music technology education support: Just-in-time learning in the recording studio using mobile technologies Ableton Live professional learning development for secondary school music teachers Tool for a real-time automatic assessment of vocal proficiency Instrument-based music theory on YouTube: Entries and barriers to lifelong learning New media as facilitators and tools of (popular) music education: Facts and findings from mainland China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1