从人类学家到代理人(又回到人类学):社会技术合作中的立场、僵局和观察

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Cultural Anthropology Pub Date : 2015-02-01 DOI:10.14506/CA30.1.09
Anthony Stavrianakis
{"title":"从人类学家到代理人(又回到人类学):社会技术合作中的立场、僵局和观察","authors":"Anthony Stavrianakis","doi":"10.14506/CA30.1.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthropologists are increasingly invited to participate in collaborations with natural scientists, among other experts, in their capacity as anthropologists. Such invitations give pause for thought about the character of the positions and practices that an anthropologist can occupy and perform. This article draws on participant observation in the Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) project, an endeavor based at Arizona State University, which aimed to modulate scientific practice. I observe and analyze the disquiet of participating social scientists by questioning the epistemic, ethical, and affective parameters of such modulation, in which social scientists were ultimately positioned and framed as actants—and not engaged as thinking subjects—for the reflexivity of natural scientists toward natural scientific work. I describe how such a method for increasing and extending the scope of scientific reflexivity was ultimately bound to the dominant instrumental norms and values of contemporary technoscience. The article suggests that reflection on problems of collaboration through questions of position and mode of engagement opens the scope and parameters for contemporary anthropological inquiry into anthropological collaborations within domains of science and technology.","PeriodicalId":51423,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Anthropology","volume":"30 1","pages":"169-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14506/CA30.1.09","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FROM ANTHROPOLOGIST TO ACTANT (AND BACK TO ANTHROPOLOGY): Position, Impasse, and Observation in Sociotechnical Collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Stavrianakis\",\"doi\":\"10.14506/CA30.1.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anthropologists are increasingly invited to participate in collaborations with natural scientists, among other experts, in their capacity as anthropologists. Such invitations give pause for thought about the character of the positions and practices that an anthropologist can occupy and perform. This article draws on participant observation in the Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) project, an endeavor based at Arizona State University, which aimed to modulate scientific practice. I observe and analyze the disquiet of participating social scientists by questioning the epistemic, ethical, and affective parameters of such modulation, in which social scientists were ultimately positioned and framed as actants—and not engaged as thinking subjects—for the reflexivity of natural scientists toward natural scientific work. I describe how such a method for increasing and extending the scope of scientific reflexivity was ultimately bound to the dominant instrumental norms and values of contemporary technoscience. The article suggests that reflection on problems of collaboration through questions of position and mode of engagement opens the scope and parameters for contemporary anthropological inquiry into anthropological collaborations within domains of science and technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"169-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14506/CA30.1.09\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14506/CA30.1.09\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14506/CA30.1.09","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

人类学家越来越多地被邀请以人类学家的身份参与与自然科学家和其他专家的合作。这样的邀请让人停下来思考人类学家可以占据和执行的职位和实践的特征。本文借鉴了社会技术整合研究(STIR)项目中的参与者观察,该项目是亚利桑那州立大学的一项努力,旨在调节科学实践。我通过质疑这种调节的认识论、伦理和情感参数来观察和分析参与其中的社会科学家的不安,在这种调节中,社会科学家最终被定位和框定为行动者,而不是作为思考主体,因为自然科学家对自然科学工作的反身性。我描述了这种增加和扩展科学反身性范围的方法是如何最终与当代技术科学的主导工具规范和价值观联系在一起的。本文认为,通过立场和参与模式的问题对合作问题的反思,为当代人类学对科学和技术领域内人类学合作的研究开辟了范围和参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FROM ANTHROPOLOGIST TO ACTANT (AND BACK TO ANTHROPOLOGY): Position, Impasse, and Observation in Sociotechnical Collaboration
Anthropologists are increasingly invited to participate in collaborations with natural scientists, among other experts, in their capacity as anthropologists. Such invitations give pause for thought about the character of the positions and practices that an anthropologist can occupy and perform. This article draws on participant observation in the Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) project, an endeavor based at Arizona State University, which aimed to modulate scientific practice. I observe and analyze the disquiet of participating social scientists by questioning the epistemic, ethical, and affective parameters of such modulation, in which social scientists were ultimately positioned and framed as actants—and not engaged as thinking subjects—for the reflexivity of natural scientists toward natural scientific work. I describe how such a method for increasing and extending the scope of scientific reflexivity was ultimately bound to the dominant instrumental norms and values of contemporary technoscience. The article suggests that reflection on problems of collaboration through questions of position and mode of engagement opens the scope and parameters for contemporary anthropological inquiry into anthropological collaborations within domains of science and technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Anthropology
Cultural Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Cultural Anthropology publishes ethnographic writing informed by a wide array of theoretical perspectives, innovative in form and content, and focused on both traditional and emerging topics. It also welcomes essays concerned with ethnographic methods and research design in historical perspective, and with ways cultural analysis can address broader public audiences and interests.
期刊最新文献
EFFECTIVE CYNICISM: Waste, Power, and the Negotiation of Urban Decay and Renewal in Ulaanbaatar FLOWERS OF DECEPTION: The Expert's Nostalgia for a Future's Past and its Occlusion of Agrarian Labor ECONOMY OF FAVORS: Tiered Labor Systems on Mexico's Car Assembly Lines IN THE SHADE OF HAILSTONES: Life-Forming Realities among the Luo of Kano, Kenya QUANTIFYING VULNERABILITY: Humanitarian Datafication and the Neophilia of Integrated Power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1