会计法规变迁:董事与审计师的不同态度

Conor O'Leary, Pran Boolaky, D. Delaney
{"title":"会计法规变迁:董事与审计师的不同态度","authors":"Conor O'Leary, Pran Boolaky, D. Delaney","doi":"10.1504/IJAAPE.2013.057523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the global financial crisis many jurisdictions adjusted or proposed to adjust their accounting regulations, to improve financial reporting frameworks. This study examines and then compares the attitudes of Australian directors and external auditors to proposed legislative changes impacting upon annual reporting requirements. Directors appear opposed to additional legislation and indicate they would be less comfortable in their current roles and may not seek additional board roles. Auditors appear in favour of proposals which increase the responsibilities of preparers and would be more comfortable in their current roles if implemented. However, they appear opposed to additional responsibilities for reviewers of those reports. Directors and auditors were unequivocal in their opposition to any proposals which could impact on audit appointment. This has audit independence implications. The significance of the study is that legislators should consider carefully the impact of proposed accounting regulation changes as the need to balance investors' rights and protections, with directors' and auditors' ability to effectively perform their duties, continues to be a complex balancing act.","PeriodicalId":35413,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJAAPE.2013.057523","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting Regulation Changes: Differing Attitudes of Directors and Auditors\",\"authors\":\"Conor O'Leary, Pran Boolaky, D. Delaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJAAPE.2013.057523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the global financial crisis many jurisdictions adjusted or proposed to adjust their accounting regulations, to improve financial reporting frameworks. This study examines and then compares the attitudes of Australian directors and external auditors to proposed legislative changes impacting upon annual reporting requirements. Directors appear opposed to additional legislation and indicate they would be less comfortable in their current roles and may not seek additional board roles. Auditors appear in favour of proposals which increase the responsibilities of preparers and would be more comfortable in their current roles if implemented. However, they appear opposed to additional responsibilities for reviewers of those reports. Directors and auditors were unequivocal in their opposition to any proposals which could impact on audit appointment. This has audit independence implications. The significance of the study is that legislators should consider carefully the impact of proposed accounting regulation changes as the need to balance investors' rights and protections, with directors' and auditors' ability to effectively perform their duties, continues to be a complex balancing act.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJAAPE.2013.057523\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2013.057523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2013.057523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在全球金融危机之后,许多司法管辖区调整或提议调整其会计法规,以改善财务报告框架。本研究考察并比较了澳大利亚董事和外部审计师对影响年度报告要求的拟议立法变化的态度。董事们似乎反对额外的立法,并表示他们在目前的角色中会感到不舒服,可能不会寻求额外的董事会角色。审计员似乎赞成增加编制人责任的建议,这些建议如果得到执行,将使他们在目前的角色中感到更自在。然而,他们似乎反对给这些报告的审查员增加责任。董事和审计员毫不含糊地反对任何可能影响审计员任命的建议。这对审计独立性有影响。这项研究的意义在于,立法者应该仔细考虑拟议的会计监管变化的影响,因为平衡投资者的权利和保护与董事和审计师有效履行职责的能力的需要仍然是一项复杂的平衡行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accounting Regulation Changes: Differing Attitudes of Directors and Auditors
After the global financial crisis many jurisdictions adjusted or proposed to adjust their accounting regulations, to improve financial reporting frameworks. This study examines and then compares the attitudes of Australian directors and external auditors to proposed legislative changes impacting upon annual reporting requirements. Directors appear opposed to additional legislation and indicate they would be less comfortable in their current roles and may not seek additional board roles. Auditors appear in favour of proposals which increase the responsibilities of preparers and would be more comfortable in their current roles if implemented. However, they appear opposed to additional responsibilities for reviewers of those reports. Directors and auditors were unequivocal in their opposition to any proposals which could impact on audit appointment. This has audit independence implications. The significance of the study is that legislators should consider carefully the impact of proposed accounting regulation changes as the need to balance investors' rights and protections, with directors' and auditors' ability to effectively perform their duties, continues to be a complex balancing act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: IJAAPE publishes original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of: financial accounting, managerial accounting, accounting education, auditing, taxation, public sector accounting, capital market and accounting, accounting information systems, performance evaluation, corporate governance, ethics, and financial management. All methodologies, such as analytical, empirical, behavioural, surveys, and case studies are welcome. IJAAPE encourages contributions especially from emerging markets and economies in transition and studies whose results are applicable across nation states or capable of being adapted to the different accounting and business environments.
期刊最新文献
Does foreign ownership affect audit committee adoption Evidence from Brazilian companies Do Islamic banks react due to the impact of Charia Supervisory Board on their financial performance A joint worldwide analysis Disclosure of forward-looking information: does overlapping audit committee membership matter Up until the consolidation on the IFRS Foundation: the companies that have been advancing integrated reporting The use and determinants of online financial reports in Europe: an empirical investigation of listed firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1