再生粗骨料混凝土试验研究

H. E. Opara, U. G. Eziefula, C. C. Ugwuegbu
{"title":"再生粗骨料混凝土试验研究","authors":"H. E. Opara, U. G. Eziefula, C. C. Ugwuegbu","doi":"10.1504/IJMSI.2016.10003018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental study of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) using recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) is reported. The RCA was obtained from construction and demolition waste (C&DW) and used as full replacement of natural coarse aggregate (NCA) for production of RAC. Crushed granite was used as NCA, while crushed concrete rubble from a demolished concrete building was used as RCA. Two groups of concrete mixtures were tested: 100% NCA as control and 100% RCA. Bulk density and compressive strength tests of concrete cubes were conducted at 7, 14, 21, and 28 curing days respectively. The results showed that bulk density and compressive strength of natural aggregate concrete (NAC) were higher than those of RAC for different ages of concrete. The bulk density and compressive strength of the 28-day RAC were 2,328 kg/m3 and 29.42 N/mm2 respectively which satisfied British Standards Institution (1997) BS 8110-1:1997 requirements for structural concrete.","PeriodicalId":39035,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Materials and Structural Integrity","volume":"130 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of concrete using recycled coarse aggregate\",\"authors\":\"H. E. Opara, U. G. Eziefula, C. C. Ugwuegbu\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJMSI.2016.10003018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An experimental study of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) using recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) is reported. The RCA was obtained from construction and demolition waste (C&DW) and used as full replacement of natural coarse aggregate (NCA) for production of RAC. Crushed granite was used as NCA, while crushed concrete rubble from a demolished concrete building was used as RCA. Two groups of concrete mixtures were tested: 100% NCA as control and 100% RCA. Bulk density and compressive strength tests of concrete cubes were conducted at 7, 14, 21, and 28 curing days respectively. The results showed that bulk density and compressive strength of natural aggregate concrete (NAC) were higher than those of RAC for different ages of concrete. The bulk density and compressive strength of the 28-day RAC were 2,328 kg/m3 and 29.42 N/mm2 respectively which satisfied British Standards Institution (1997) BS 8110-1:1997 requirements for structural concrete.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Materials and Structural Integrity\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Materials and Structural Integrity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSI.2016.10003018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Materials and Structural Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSI.2016.10003018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

采用再生粗骨料(RCA)对再生骨料混凝土(RAC)进行了试验研究。从建筑垃圾(C&DW)中提取粗骨料,完全替代天然粗骨料(NCA)生产RAC。破碎的花岗岩被用作NCA,而从拆除的混凝土建筑中破碎的混凝土瓦砾被用作RCA。测试了两组混凝土混合料:100% NCA作为对照和100% RCA。分别在养护第7、14、21和28天进行混凝土立方体的容重和抗压强度试验。结果表明:不同龄期天然骨料混凝土(NAC)的容重和抗压强度均高于RAC;28天RAC的容重和抗压强度分别为2328 kg/m3和29.42 N/mm2,满足英国标准协会(1997)BS 8110- 1:20 97对结构混凝土的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental study of concrete using recycled coarse aggregate
An experimental study of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) using recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) is reported. The RCA was obtained from construction and demolition waste (C&DW) and used as full replacement of natural coarse aggregate (NCA) for production of RAC. Crushed granite was used as NCA, while crushed concrete rubble from a demolished concrete building was used as RCA. Two groups of concrete mixtures were tested: 100% NCA as control and 100% RCA. Bulk density and compressive strength tests of concrete cubes were conducted at 7, 14, 21, and 28 curing days respectively. The results showed that bulk density and compressive strength of natural aggregate concrete (NAC) were higher than those of RAC for different ages of concrete. The bulk density and compressive strength of the 28-day RAC were 2,328 kg/m3 and 29.42 N/mm2 respectively which satisfied British Standards Institution (1997) BS 8110-1:1997 requirements for structural concrete.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compressive strength enhancement of concrete using fly ash as a partial replacement of fine aggregate and model development Flexural fatigue analysis of fibre reinforced polymer concrete composites under non-reversed loading A new simple formulation for instantaneous coil diameter of a SMA helical spring Effects of two-step heat treatment on the structure of cotton-derived activated carbon fibres Mechanics of contact interaction and deformation of main pipelines in the conditions of extreme external actions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1