未来情景的可行性指标

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy Pub Date : 2013-12-01 DOI:10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611
Arnim Wiek, L. Keeler, V. Schweizer, D. Lang
{"title":"未来情景的可行性指标","authors":"Arnim Wiek, L. Keeler, V. Schweizer, D. Lang","doi":"10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality criteria for generating future-oriented knowledge and future scenarios are different from those developed for knowledge about past and current events. Such quality criteria can be defined relative to the intended function of the knowledge. Plausibility has emerged as a central quality criterion of scenarios that allows exploring the future with credibility and saliency. But what exactly is plausibility vis-a-vis probability, consistency, and desirability? And how can plausibility be evaluated and constructed in scenarios? Sufficient plausibility, in this article, refers to scenarios that hold enough evidence to be considered ‘occurrable’. This might have been the underlying idea of scenarios all along without being explicitly elaborated in a pragmatic concept or methodology. Here, we operationalise plausibility in scenarios through a set of plausibility indications and illustrate the proposal with scenarios constructed for Phoenix, Arizona. The article operationalises the concept of plausibility in scenarios to support scholars and practitioners alike.","PeriodicalId":35015,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"133-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plausibility indications in future scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Arnim Wiek, L. Keeler, V. Schweizer, D. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quality criteria for generating future-oriented knowledge and future scenarios are different from those developed for knowledge about past and current events. Such quality criteria can be defined relative to the intended function of the knowledge. Plausibility has emerged as a central quality criterion of scenarios that allows exploring the future with credibility and saliency. But what exactly is plausibility vis-a-vis probability, consistency, and desirability? And how can plausibility be evaluated and constructed in scenarios? Sufficient plausibility, in this article, refers to scenarios that hold enough evidence to be considered ‘occurrable’. This might have been the underlying idea of scenarios all along without being explicitly elaborated in a pragmatic concept or methodology. Here, we operationalise plausibility in scenarios through a set of plausibility indications and illustrate the proposal with scenarios constructed for Phoenix, Arizona. The article operationalises the concept of plausibility in scenarios to support scholars and practitioners alike.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"133-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

生成面向未来的知识和未来情景的质量标准不同于为过去和当前事件的知识开发的质量标准。这样的质量标准可以根据知识的预期功能来定义。合理性已经成为情景的核心质量标准,它允许以可信度和显著性探索未来。但是,相对于概率、一致性和可取性,可信性究竟是什么?如何在场景中评估和构建合理性?在这篇文章中,充分的合理性指的是拥有足够证据的情景被认为是“可发生的”。这可能一直是场景的潜在想法,而没有在实用主义概念或方法中明确阐述。在这里,我们通过一组可行性指标来操作场景中的可行性,并通过为亚利桑那州凤凰城构建的场景来说明该提案。本文将可行性的概念应用于场景中,以支持学者和实践者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plausibility indications in future scenarios
Quality criteria for generating future-oriented knowledge and future scenarios are different from those developed for knowledge about past and current events. Such quality criteria can be defined relative to the intended function of the knowledge. Plausibility has emerged as a central quality criterion of scenarios that allows exploring the future with credibility and saliency. But what exactly is plausibility vis-a-vis probability, consistency, and desirability? And how can plausibility be evaluated and constructed in scenarios? Sufficient plausibility, in this article, refers to scenarios that hold enough evidence to be considered ‘occurrable’. This might have been the underlying idea of scenarios all along without being explicitly elaborated in a pragmatic concept or methodology. Here, we operationalise plausibility in scenarios through a set of plausibility indications and illustrate the proposal with scenarios constructed for Phoenix, Arizona. The article operationalises the concept of plausibility in scenarios to support scholars and practitioners alike.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy
International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The IJFIP has been established as a peer reviewed, international authoritative reference in the field. It publishes high calibre academic articles dealing with knowledge creation, diffusion and utilisation in innovation policy. The journal thus covers all types of Strategic Intelligence (SI). SI is defined as the set of actions that search, process, diffuse and protect information in order to make it available to the right person at the right time in order to make the right decision. Examples of SI in the domain of innovation include Foresight, Forecasting, Delphi studies, Technology Assessment, Benchmarking, R&D evaluation and Technology Roadmapping.
期刊最新文献
Actual strategic directions for the development of Russian fuel and energy companies to ensure the country's economic security Strategic foresight for competitive advantage: A future-oriented business and competitive analysis techniques selection model Size does matter: South Africa's automotive industry during and post the COVID-19 pandemic Futures of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, including Computer Science (STEM/CS) Education: What will the crossroad with Liberal Arts look like Forecasting New Product Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1