不同沉剂对硬明胶胶囊产品溶出性能的研究

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Dissolution Technologies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.14227/dt270320p21
Yaser Mansuroglu, J. Dressman
{"title":"不同沉剂对硬明胶胶囊产品溶出性能的研究","authors":"Yaser Mansuroglu, J. Dressman","doi":"10.14227/dt270320p21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dissolution testing is a commonly used tool for the quality control of various dosage forms. For this purpose, consistent test conditions are necessary to obtain reproducible test results. Typical issues that can affect the dissolution performance of tested capsule formulations are floating and coning. Recently, the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guideline recommended the use of sinkers to prevent coning, although no accompanying data to support the recommendation has been published in the open literature to date. Therefore, we initiated studies designed to address the following key questions. A) Do all sinkers prevent flotation of the dosage form? B) Does using sinkers consistently increase the dissolution rate? C) Do sinkers consistently decrease coning? Three commercially available hard capsule drug products were studied: acetaminophen, fluconazole, and ketoprofen. Dissolution was performed without a sinker and with four commercially available sinkers (CLIPS, CAPLOTH, CAPWAST, and JP). Analysis of the results revealed that, although three of the four sinkers were able to adequately address flotation problems, in many cases their use led to artifactual increases or decreases in the dissolution of the capsules. Further, sinkers do not seem to be generally useful for addressing coning issues. Instead, an increase in the stirring speed or use of peak vessels should be considered.","PeriodicalId":11380,"journal":{"name":"Dissolution Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":"21-32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Dissolution Performance of Hard Gelatin Capsule Products Using Various Sinkers\",\"authors\":\"Yaser Mansuroglu, J. Dressman\",\"doi\":\"10.14227/dt270320p21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dissolution testing is a commonly used tool for the quality control of various dosage forms. For this purpose, consistent test conditions are necessary to obtain reproducible test results. Typical issues that can affect the dissolution performance of tested capsule formulations are floating and coning. Recently, the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guideline recommended the use of sinkers to prevent coning, although no accompanying data to support the recommendation has been published in the open literature to date. Therefore, we initiated studies designed to address the following key questions. A) Do all sinkers prevent flotation of the dosage form? B) Does using sinkers consistently increase the dissolution rate? C) Do sinkers consistently decrease coning? Three commercially available hard capsule drug products were studied: acetaminophen, fluconazole, and ketoprofen. Dissolution was performed without a sinker and with four commercially available sinkers (CLIPS, CAPLOTH, CAPWAST, and JP). Analysis of the results revealed that, although three of the four sinkers were able to adequately address flotation problems, in many cases their use led to artifactual increases or decreases in the dissolution of the capsules. Further, sinkers do not seem to be generally useful for addressing coning issues. Instead, an increase in the stirring speed or use of peak vessels should be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dissolution Technologies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"21-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dissolution Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14227/dt270320p21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissolution Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14227/dt270320p21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

溶出度试验是各种剂型质量控制的常用工具。为此,一致的测试条件是获得可重复的测试结果所必需的。影响所测胶囊配方溶出性能的典型问题是漂浮和锥形。最近,国际协调会议(ICH)指南建议使用下沉器来防止锥形,尽管迄今为止在公开文献中没有发表支持该建议的相关数据。因此,我们启动了旨在解决以下关键问题的研究。A)所有沉剂都能防止剂型的漂浮吗?B)使用沉降剂会持续增加溶解速率吗?C)下沉者是否持续减少回转?研究了三种市售硬胶囊药物:对乙酰氨基酚、氟康唑和酮洛芬。溶解在没有下沉剂的情况下进行,使用了四种市售下沉剂(CLIPS、CAPLOTH、CAPWAST和JP)。对结果的分析表明,尽管四种下沉剂中有三种能够充分解决浮选问题,但在许多情况下,它们的使用会人为地增加或减少胶囊的溶解。此外,下沉球对于解决即将到来的问题似乎并不普遍有用。相反,应考虑提高搅拌速度或使用峰值容器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of Dissolution Performance of Hard Gelatin Capsule Products Using Various Sinkers
Dissolution testing is a commonly used tool for the quality control of various dosage forms. For this purpose, consistent test conditions are necessary to obtain reproducible test results. Typical issues that can affect the dissolution performance of tested capsule formulations are floating and coning. Recently, the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guideline recommended the use of sinkers to prevent coning, although no accompanying data to support the recommendation has been published in the open literature to date. Therefore, we initiated studies designed to address the following key questions. A) Do all sinkers prevent flotation of the dosage form? B) Does using sinkers consistently increase the dissolution rate? C) Do sinkers consistently decrease coning? Three commercially available hard capsule drug products were studied: acetaminophen, fluconazole, and ketoprofen. Dissolution was performed without a sinker and with four commercially available sinkers (CLIPS, CAPLOTH, CAPWAST, and JP). Analysis of the results revealed that, although three of the four sinkers were able to adequately address flotation problems, in many cases their use led to artifactual increases or decreases in the dissolution of the capsules. Further, sinkers do not seem to be generally useful for addressing coning issues. Instead, an increase in the stirring speed or use of peak vessels should be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dissolution Technologies
Dissolution Technologies 医学-药学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
14
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dissolution Technologies is a peer reviewed quarterly publication reporting ongoing, useful information on dissolution testing of pharmaceuticals. It provides an international forum for dissolution analysts to receive and exchange information on various dissolution topics. Dissolution Technologies welcomes submissions related to dissolution, in vitro release, and disintegration testing. These topics should be the major focus of the article. Do not submit articles where the focus is formulation development with dissolution testing as one of many tests.
期刊最新文献
Steady-state burning plasma: a new stage in the development of magnetic confinement fusion energy. Investigating the Influence of HPMC K4M and Eudragit L 100-55 on Guanfacine-Loaded Extended-Release Tablets Questions and Answers February 2023 Effect of Mannitol Particle Size on Melatonin Dissolution and Tablet Properties using a Quality by Design Framework Physicochemical Quality and In Vitro Bioequivalence of Amoxicillin Capsules Marketed in Burkina Faso, Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1