沙特阿拉伯市售对乙酰氨基酚片的比较分析

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Dissolution Technologies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14227/dt290322pgc2
A. Alwadi, Ghosoun M. Arafeh, Mohammad S. Almehlesi, H. Maswadeh, I. M. Salman, O. Ameer
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯市售对乙酰氨基酚片的比较分析","authors":"A. Alwadi, Ghosoun M. Arafeh, Mohammad S. Almehlesi, H. Maswadeh, I. M. Salman, O. Ameer","doi":"10.14227/dt290322pgc2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acetaminophen is a widely used oral analgesic and antipyretic medication; however, quality control parameters may differ across various brands. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare critical quality attributes, including in-vitro dissolution characteristics, of five acetaminophen tablet brands (labeled A–E) from the Saudi market and determine their pharmaceutical equivalence. All brands were tested for conformity with the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) standards, through evaluation of weight variation, hardness, friability, disintegration, and dissolution. Dissolution profiles were compared using model-dependent and independent approaches relative to the innovator brand A (Panadol). All tested brands passed the weight variation and friability tests with deviations of less than 5% from the average weight and less than 1% weight loss, respectively, with the exception of brand C showing relatively higher friability (1.13%). All brands displayed variable disintegration times; however, all were compliant with USP specifications. All studied tablets released less than 80% of the drug within 30 minutes; however, brands B and C had lower drug release rates, area under the curve (AUC), and dissolution efficiency (DE) compared with the innovator. Brand E, on the other hand, had a higher drug release rate, AUC, DE, and mean dissolution time (MDT), and thus was pharmaceutically inequivalent to the innovator. All tested brands exhibited a non swellable matrix diffusion-controlled dissolution as assessed by the Korsmeyer-Peppas model of drug-release kinetics. In conclusion, all acetaminophen brands were able to pass USP specifications to justify interchangeability. Minor variations in in-vitro dissolution characteristics could reflect inherent manufacturing compounding differences.","PeriodicalId":11380,"journal":{"name":"Dissolution Technologies","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Commercially Available Acetaminophen Tablets in Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"A. Alwadi, Ghosoun M. Arafeh, Mohammad S. Almehlesi, H. Maswadeh, I. M. Salman, O. Ameer\",\"doi\":\"10.14227/dt290322pgc2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Acetaminophen is a widely used oral analgesic and antipyretic medication; however, quality control parameters may differ across various brands. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare critical quality attributes, including in-vitro dissolution characteristics, of five acetaminophen tablet brands (labeled A–E) from the Saudi market and determine their pharmaceutical equivalence. All brands were tested for conformity with the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) standards, through evaluation of weight variation, hardness, friability, disintegration, and dissolution. Dissolution profiles were compared using model-dependent and independent approaches relative to the innovator brand A (Panadol). All tested brands passed the weight variation and friability tests with deviations of less than 5% from the average weight and less than 1% weight loss, respectively, with the exception of brand C showing relatively higher friability (1.13%). All brands displayed variable disintegration times; however, all were compliant with USP specifications. All studied tablets released less than 80% of the drug within 30 minutes; however, brands B and C had lower drug release rates, area under the curve (AUC), and dissolution efficiency (DE) compared with the innovator. Brand E, on the other hand, had a higher drug release rate, AUC, DE, and mean dissolution time (MDT), and thus was pharmaceutically inequivalent to the innovator. All tested brands exhibited a non swellable matrix diffusion-controlled dissolution as assessed by the Korsmeyer-Peppas model of drug-release kinetics. In conclusion, all acetaminophen brands were able to pass USP specifications to justify interchangeability. Minor variations in in-vitro dissolution characteristics could reflect inherent manufacturing compounding differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dissolution Technologies\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dissolution Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14227/dt290322pgc2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissolution Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14227/dt290322pgc2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对乙酰氨基酚是一种广泛使用的口服镇痛解热药物;然而,不同品牌的质量控制参数可能有所不同。本研究的目的是评估和比较沙特市场上五种对乙酰氨基酚片剂(标签为A-E)的关键质量属性,包括体外溶出度特征,并确定其药物等效性。通过对重量变化、硬度、脆性、崩解和溶出度的评估,对所有品牌进行了符合美国药典(USP)标准的测试。采用与创新品牌A (Panadol)相关的模型依赖和独立方法比较溶出概况。所有被测品牌均通过了重量变异和易碎性测试,与平均重量偏差小于5%,重量损失小于1%,但C品牌易碎性较高,为1.13%。所有品牌都显示不同的分解时间;然而,所有的都符合USP规范。所有被研究的片剂在30分钟内释放的药物都少于80%;然而,与创新品牌相比,品牌B和C的药物释放率、曲线下面积(AUC)和溶出效率(DE)较低。另一方面,品牌E具有更高的药物释放率、AUC、DE和平均溶出时间(MDT),因此在药学上与创新者不相等。通过Korsmeyer-Peppas药物释放动力学模型评估,所有测试品牌均表现出不可膨胀的基质扩散控制溶出。总之,所有对乙酰氨基酚品牌都能够通过USP规范来证明互换性。体外溶出特性的微小变化可能反映出内在的制造复合差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Commercially Available Acetaminophen Tablets in Saudi Arabia
Acetaminophen is a widely used oral analgesic and antipyretic medication; however, quality control parameters may differ across various brands. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare critical quality attributes, including in-vitro dissolution characteristics, of five acetaminophen tablet brands (labeled A–E) from the Saudi market and determine their pharmaceutical equivalence. All brands were tested for conformity with the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) standards, through evaluation of weight variation, hardness, friability, disintegration, and dissolution. Dissolution profiles were compared using model-dependent and independent approaches relative to the innovator brand A (Panadol). All tested brands passed the weight variation and friability tests with deviations of less than 5% from the average weight and less than 1% weight loss, respectively, with the exception of brand C showing relatively higher friability (1.13%). All brands displayed variable disintegration times; however, all were compliant with USP specifications. All studied tablets released less than 80% of the drug within 30 minutes; however, brands B and C had lower drug release rates, area under the curve (AUC), and dissolution efficiency (DE) compared with the innovator. Brand E, on the other hand, had a higher drug release rate, AUC, DE, and mean dissolution time (MDT), and thus was pharmaceutically inequivalent to the innovator. All tested brands exhibited a non swellable matrix diffusion-controlled dissolution as assessed by the Korsmeyer-Peppas model of drug-release kinetics. In conclusion, all acetaminophen brands were able to pass USP specifications to justify interchangeability. Minor variations in in-vitro dissolution characteristics could reflect inherent manufacturing compounding differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dissolution Technologies
Dissolution Technologies 医学-药学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
14
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dissolution Technologies is a peer reviewed quarterly publication reporting ongoing, useful information on dissolution testing of pharmaceuticals. It provides an international forum for dissolution analysts to receive and exchange information on various dissolution topics. Dissolution Technologies welcomes submissions related to dissolution, in vitro release, and disintegration testing. These topics should be the major focus of the article. Do not submit articles where the focus is formulation development with dissolution testing as one of many tests.
期刊最新文献
Steady-state burning plasma: a new stage in the development of magnetic confinement fusion energy. Investigating the Influence of HPMC K4M and Eudragit L 100-55 on Guanfacine-Loaded Extended-Release Tablets Questions and Answers February 2023 Effect of Mannitol Particle Size on Melatonin Dissolution and Tablet Properties using a Quality by Design Framework Physicochemical Quality and In Vitro Bioequivalence of Amoxicillin Capsules Marketed in Burkina Faso, Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1