加拿大文学6.0

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN CANADIAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2016-04-25 DOI:10.14288/CL.V0I225.187916
L. Moss
{"title":"加拿大文学6.0","authors":"L. Moss","doi":"10.14288/CL.V0I225.187916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"6 In September 2015, I became the sixth editor of Canadian Literature, following Margery Fee, Laurie Ricou, Eva-Marie Kröller, W. H. New, and George Woodcock. Daunting. Each editor has le& a mark on the journal and the 'eld: Margery ushered in the digital humanities and conceived of the open-access educational resource CanLit Guides; Laurie brought ecocritical awareness and academic creativity; Eva-Marie formalized the peer-review process, made the journal international in readership, and extended the francophone content; Bill placed Canadian literature within the 'eld of Commonwealth studies and emphasized the work of minority and Indigenous writers; and Woodcock (it feels presumptuous to call a man I never met by his 'rst name) began it all with a goal of critical eclecticism. As I said, daunting. Before I began as editor, I was asked to cra& a vision statement for the journal. Generally, I am more inclined towards creating “To Do” lists than vision statements. I tend to approach manifestos with incredulity. Still, I was asked. My vision is straightforward, albeit aspirational: publish important work on Canadian literature and culture; support the teaching of Canadian writing through the continued development of CanLit Guides; maintain multidisciplinarity; circulate criticism that counts; steer clear of themespotting; value literary history; pay attention to a diversity of voices and perspectives; read broadly and deeply; review equitably; imagine communities; think in planetary terms; honour the place we stand and the territories we are in; never be seared by the beauty of crocuses; take on ethical debates and issues of social justice; think intersectionally; continue to make connections across generations between scholars, readers, and writers; share knowledge; avoid siloes; 'ght 'ercely for the humanities; care about the state of the profession; acknowledge precarity; nourish generosity; recognize originality; appreciate creativity; question generic expectations; welcome radical play; Canadian Literature 6.0","PeriodicalId":44701,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN LITERATURE","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canadian Literature 6.0\",\"authors\":\"L. Moss\",\"doi\":\"10.14288/CL.V0I225.187916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"6 In September 2015, I became the sixth editor of Canadian Literature, following Margery Fee, Laurie Ricou, Eva-Marie Kröller, W. H. New, and George Woodcock. Daunting. Each editor has le& a mark on the journal and the 'eld: Margery ushered in the digital humanities and conceived of the open-access educational resource CanLit Guides; Laurie brought ecocritical awareness and academic creativity; Eva-Marie formalized the peer-review process, made the journal international in readership, and extended the francophone content; Bill placed Canadian literature within the 'eld of Commonwealth studies and emphasized the work of minority and Indigenous writers; and Woodcock (it feels presumptuous to call a man I never met by his 'rst name) began it all with a goal of critical eclecticism. As I said, daunting. Before I began as editor, I was asked to cra& a vision statement for the journal. Generally, I am more inclined towards creating “To Do” lists than vision statements. I tend to approach manifestos with incredulity. Still, I was asked. My vision is straightforward, albeit aspirational: publish important work on Canadian literature and culture; support the teaching of Canadian writing through the continued development of CanLit Guides; maintain multidisciplinarity; circulate criticism that counts; steer clear of themespotting; value literary history; pay attention to a diversity of voices and perspectives; read broadly and deeply; review equitably; imagine communities; think in planetary terms; honour the place we stand and the territories we are in; never be seared by the beauty of crocuses; take on ethical debates and issues of social justice; think intersectionally; continue to make connections across generations between scholars, readers, and writers; share knowledge; avoid siloes; 'ght 'ercely for the humanities; care about the state of the profession; acknowledge precarity; nourish generosity; recognize originality; appreciate creativity; question generic expectations; welcome radical play; Canadian Literature 6.0\",\"PeriodicalId\":44701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14288/CL.V0I225.187916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CL.V0I225.187916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年9月,我成为《加拿大文学》杂志继玛杰里·费、劳里·里库、伊娃·玛丽Kröller、w·h·纽和乔治·伍德科克之后的第六位编辑。令人望而生畏。每一位编辑都在期刊和领域留下了自己的印记:Margery开创了数字人文学科,并构想了开放获取的教育资源CanLit Guides;劳瑞带来了生态批评意识和学术创造力;Eva-Marie规范了同行评议过程,使期刊的读者群国际化,并扩展了法语内容;比尔将加拿大文学置于联邦研究领域,并强调少数民族和土著作家的作品;伍德科克(对一个我从未见过的人直呼其名,感觉有些冒昧)以批判折衷主义的目标开始了这一切。就像我说的,令人生畏。在我开始担任编辑之前,我被要求为期刊撰写一份愿景声明。一般来说,我更倾向于创建“要做”的清单,而不是愿景陈述。我倾向于对宣言持怀疑态度。尽管如此,我还是被问到。我的愿景很明确,虽然很有抱负:出版关于加拿大文学和文化的重要著作;通过CanLit指南的持续发展支持加拿大写作教学;维持multidisciplinarity;传播有价值的批评;避开主题定位;价值文学史;注意不同的声音和观点;广泛而深入地阅读;检查公平;想象社区;从地球的角度考虑;尊重我们所处的位置和我们所处的领土;永远不要被番红花的美丽所灼伤;承担伦理辩论和社会正义的问题;认为交点的;继续在学者、读者和作家之间建立跨代联系;分享知识;避免筒仓;“光”是指人文学科;关心职业状况;承认precarity;滋养慷慨;认识到创意;欣赏创造力;质疑一般期望;欢迎激进的游戏;加拿大文学6.0
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Canadian Literature 6.0
6 In September 2015, I became the sixth editor of Canadian Literature, following Margery Fee, Laurie Ricou, Eva-Marie Kröller, W. H. New, and George Woodcock. Daunting. Each editor has le& a mark on the journal and the 'eld: Margery ushered in the digital humanities and conceived of the open-access educational resource CanLit Guides; Laurie brought ecocritical awareness and academic creativity; Eva-Marie formalized the peer-review process, made the journal international in readership, and extended the francophone content; Bill placed Canadian literature within the 'eld of Commonwealth studies and emphasized the work of minority and Indigenous writers; and Woodcock (it feels presumptuous to call a man I never met by his 'rst name) began it all with a goal of critical eclecticism. As I said, daunting. Before I began as editor, I was asked to cra& a vision statement for the journal. Generally, I am more inclined towards creating “To Do” lists than vision statements. I tend to approach manifestos with incredulity. Still, I was asked. My vision is straightforward, albeit aspirational: publish important work on Canadian literature and culture; support the teaching of Canadian writing through the continued development of CanLit Guides; maintain multidisciplinarity; circulate criticism that counts; steer clear of themespotting; value literary history; pay attention to a diversity of voices and perspectives; read broadly and deeply; review equitably; imagine communities; think in planetary terms; honour the place we stand and the territories we are in; never be seared by the beauty of crocuses; take on ethical debates and issues of social justice; think intersectionally; continue to make connections across generations between scholars, readers, and writers; share knowledge; avoid siloes; 'ght 'ercely for the humanities; care about the state of the profession; acknowledge precarity; nourish generosity; recognize originality; appreciate creativity; question generic expectations; welcome radical play; Canadian Literature 6.0
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN LITERATURE
CANADIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Canadian Literature aims to foster a wider academic interest in the Canadian literary field, and publishes a wide range of material from Canadian and international scholars, writers, and poets. Each issue contains a variety of critical articles, an extensive book reviews section, and a selection of original poetry.
期刊最新文献
Where Was Here Presence of the Past Goodbye to Language Alice Munro’s “Providence,” Second-Wave Feminism, and the (Im)possibilities of Reconciling Motherhood and Liberation Playful Experiments with Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1