{"title":"Jean Lopez和Lasha Otkhmezuri评论,Joukov:打败希特勒的人","authors":"J. Lane","doi":"10.15388/bjps.2014.3.4917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the history of the Baltic States in the 20th century is completely dominated by their relation to the Eastern giant, the Soviet Union. What the Soviet Union represented was not only an authoritarian, and at times, totalitarian rulership but also a constant fear of the unpredictable. Two French military historians, connected with the journal Guerre et Histoire, have recently managed to go through newly opened archives in Russia to unveil the unpredictable career of the most distinguished commander of the Red Army, Gregory Zhukov. Their book entirely confirms the impression among Baltic people that the Soviet Union was fundamentally instable in the sense that anything could happen: state arbitrariness. The research methodology employed in this biography of Zhukov is a novelty, as the French scholars have refrained from using the many memoires written by the participants of Operation Barbarossa. Instead, they rely upon so-called primary sources to show how all the memoir writers, including Zhukov, deviated from the truth in one way or another in order to tell self-flattering stories. The result is a brilliant analysis of how the Soviet state operated in its most important section, defence. It is also very interesting because it analyses strategies employed by both sides, not only by the Red Army but also by Wehrmacht Ostheer. The findings from this in-depth analysis of Zhukov’s life – a real roller coaster – include the following points:","PeriodicalId":33612,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Political Science","volume":"3 1","pages":"156 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Jean Lopez & Lasha Otkhmezuri, Joukov: L'Homme Qui A Vaincu Hitler\",\"authors\":\"J. Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/bjps.2014.3.4917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most of the history of the Baltic States in the 20th century is completely dominated by their relation to the Eastern giant, the Soviet Union. What the Soviet Union represented was not only an authoritarian, and at times, totalitarian rulership but also a constant fear of the unpredictable. Two French military historians, connected with the journal Guerre et Histoire, have recently managed to go through newly opened archives in Russia to unveil the unpredictable career of the most distinguished commander of the Red Army, Gregory Zhukov. Their book entirely confirms the impression among Baltic people that the Soviet Union was fundamentally instable in the sense that anything could happen: state arbitrariness. The research methodology employed in this biography of Zhukov is a novelty, as the French scholars have refrained from using the many memoires written by the participants of Operation Barbarossa. Instead, they rely upon so-called primary sources to show how all the memoir writers, including Zhukov, deviated from the truth in one way or another in order to tell self-flattering stories. The result is a brilliant analysis of how the Soviet state operated in its most important section, defence. It is also very interesting because it analyses strategies employed by both sides, not only by the Red Army but also by Wehrmacht Ostheer. The findings from this in-depth analysis of Zhukov’s life – a real roller coaster – include the following points:\",\"PeriodicalId\":33612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of Political Science\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"156 - 158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/bjps.2014.3.4917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/bjps.2014.3.4917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
波罗的海国家在20世纪的大部分历史完全被它们与东方巨人苏联的关系所主导。苏联所代表的不仅是威权主义,有时是极权主义统治,而且是对不可预测的持续恐惧。两位与《Guerre et Histoire》杂志有联系的法国军事历史学家,最近通过查阅俄罗斯新开放的档案,揭开了最杰出的红军指挥官格雷戈里·朱可夫(Gregory Zhukov)不可预知的职业生涯。他们的书完全证实了波罗的海人民的印象,即苏联从根本上来说是不稳定的,因为任何事情都可能发生:国家的专断。朱可夫传记所采用的研究方法是新颖的,因为法国学者没有使用巴巴罗萨行动参与者所写的许多回忆录。相反,他们依靠所谓的第一手资料来证明,包括朱可夫在内的所有回忆录作者如何以这样或那样的方式偏离真相,以讲述自我吹捧的故事。其结果是对苏联政府如何在其最重要的领域——国防——运作进行了精彩的分析。这本书也很有趣,因为它分析了双方的战略,不仅是红军的,还有国防军的。对朱可夫的人生——一个真正的过山车——进行深入分析,得出以下结论:
Review of Jean Lopez & Lasha Otkhmezuri, Joukov: L'Homme Qui A Vaincu Hitler
Most of the history of the Baltic States in the 20th century is completely dominated by their relation to the Eastern giant, the Soviet Union. What the Soviet Union represented was not only an authoritarian, and at times, totalitarian rulership but also a constant fear of the unpredictable. Two French military historians, connected with the journal Guerre et Histoire, have recently managed to go through newly opened archives in Russia to unveil the unpredictable career of the most distinguished commander of the Red Army, Gregory Zhukov. Their book entirely confirms the impression among Baltic people that the Soviet Union was fundamentally instable in the sense that anything could happen: state arbitrariness. The research methodology employed in this biography of Zhukov is a novelty, as the French scholars have refrained from using the many memoires written by the participants of Operation Barbarossa. Instead, they rely upon so-called primary sources to show how all the memoir writers, including Zhukov, deviated from the truth in one way or another in order to tell self-flattering stories. The result is a brilliant analysis of how the Soviet state operated in its most important section, defence. It is also very interesting because it analyses strategies employed by both sides, not only by the Red Army but also by Wehrmacht Ostheer. The findings from this in-depth analysis of Zhukov’s life – a real roller coaster – include the following points: