{"title":"意识形态批评的历史和及时性的主题与主题","authors":"Falko Schmieder","doi":"10.1515/iasl-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The essay ties in with current attempts at systematic reconstruction and reappropriation of the method of ideology critique. It argues that such attempts should not be satisfied with the reconstruction of an alleged core or basic essence, but should additionally address both the reasons for the historical decline of ideology critique and the new phenomena that lead to tensions with classical approaches to it.","PeriodicalId":42506,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONALES ARCHIV FUR SOZIALGESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN LITERATUR","volume":"47 1","pages":"61 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thesen und Fragen zur Historizität und Aktualität der Ideologiekritik\",\"authors\":\"Falko Schmieder\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/iasl-2022-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The essay ties in with current attempts at systematic reconstruction and reappropriation of the method of ideology critique. It argues that such attempts should not be satisfied with the reconstruction of an alleged core or basic essence, but should additionally address both the reasons for the historical decline of ideology critique and the new phenomena that lead to tensions with classical approaches to it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONALES ARCHIV FUR SOZIALGESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN LITERATUR\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"61 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONALES ARCHIV FUR SOZIALGESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN LITERATUR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/iasl-2022-0005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONALES ARCHIV FUR SOZIALGESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN LITERATUR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iasl-2022-0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thesen und Fragen zur Historizität und Aktualität der Ideologiekritik
Abstract The essay ties in with current attempts at systematic reconstruction and reappropriation of the method of ideology critique. It argues that such attempts should not be satisfied with the reconstruction of an alleged core or basic essence, but should additionally address both the reasons for the historical decline of ideology critique and the new phenomena that lead to tensions with classical approaches to it.