医学、科学和贵格会:“清教主义与科学”之争的重新思考。

P. Elmer
{"title":"医学、科学和贵格会:“清教主义与科学”之争的重新思考。","authors":"P. Elmer","doi":"10.14296/fhs.v54i6.4821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A far as I am aware, no comprehensive study exists of early Quaker attitudes to science and medicine. This is particularly surprising in the light of the recent historical debate concerning the \"puritan\" origins of scientific reform in seventeenth-century England, yet it must be said that Quaker sources have on the whole been ignored. 1 More­ over, where the scientific and medical opinions of early Friends have elicited historical comment, it is customarily%?' assumed that Quaker attitudes to science were to a large extent related to the general \"puritan\" predilection for educational and scientific reform. As a result, historians of Quakerism such as Frederick Tolles and Richard Greaves have been able to establish the progressive nature of Quaker science which they believe to have derived from the ''puritan\" commitment to the utilitarian natural philosophy of Francis Bacon. According to Greaves therefore, the Quakers are to be firmly located within the \"puritan Baconian\" tradition, for:","PeriodicalId":83142,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Friends' Historical Society","volume":"54 6 1","pages":"265-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicine, science and the Quakers: the \\\"Puritanism-science\\\" debate reconsidered.\",\"authors\":\"P. Elmer\",\"doi\":\"10.14296/fhs.v54i6.4821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A far as I am aware, no comprehensive study exists of early Quaker attitudes to science and medicine. This is particularly surprising in the light of the recent historical debate concerning the \\\"puritan\\\" origins of scientific reform in seventeenth-century England, yet it must be said that Quaker sources have on the whole been ignored. 1 More­ over, where the scientific and medical opinions of early Friends have elicited historical comment, it is customarily%?' assumed that Quaker attitudes to science were to a large extent related to the general \\\"puritan\\\" predilection for educational and scientific reform. As a result, historians of Quakerism such as Frederick Tolles and Richard Greaves have been able to establish the progressive nature of Quaker science which they believe to have derived from the ''puritan\\\" commitment to the utilitarian natural philosophy of Francis Bacon. According to Greaves therefore, the Quakers are to be firmly located within the \\\"puritan Baconian\\\" tradition, for:\",\"PeriodicalId\":83142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Friends' Historical Society\",\"volume\":\"54 6 1\",\"pages\":\"265-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Friends' Historical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14296/fhs.v54i6.4821\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Friends' Historical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14296/fhs.v54i6.4821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

据我所知,没有关于早期贵格会对科学和医学态度的全面研究。鉴于最近关于17世纪英国科学改革的“清教徒”起源的历史争论,这一点尤其令人惊讶,但必须说,贵格会的资料总体上被忽视了。此外,早期《老友记》的科学和医学观点引起历史评论的地方,通常是%?假设贵格会对科学的态度在很大程度上与普遍的“清教徒”对教育和科学改革的偏好有关。因此,像弗雷德里克·托尔斯和理查德·格里夫斯这样的贵格派历史学家已经能够确立贵格派科学的进步本质,他们相信这种进步本质源于对弗朗西斯·培根功利主义自然哲学的“清教徒”承诺。因此,根据格里夫斯的说法,贵格会应该牢牢地定位在“清教徒培根”的传统中,因为:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medicine, science and the Quakers: the "Puritanism-science" debate reconsidered.
A far as I am aware, no comprehensive study exists of early Quaker attitudes to science and medicine. This is particularly surprising in the light of the recent historical debate concerning the "puritan" origins of scientific reform in seventeenth-century England, yet it must be said that Quaker sources have on the whole been ignored. 1 More­ over, where the scientific and medical opinions of early Friends have elicited historical comment, it is customarily%?' assumed that Quaker attitudes to science were to a large extent related to the general "puritan" predilection for educational and scientific reform. As a result, historians of Quakerism such as Frederick Tolles and Richard Greaves have been able to establish the progressive nature of Quaker science which they believe to have derived from the ''puritan" commitment to the utilitarian natural philosophy of Francis Bacon. According to Greaves therefore, the Quakers are to be firmly located within the "puritan Baconian" tradition, for:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
John Hodgson: soldier, surgeon, agitator and Quaker? The great Russian famine of 1891-2: E. W. Brooks and Friends famine relief. Thomas Bevill Peacock: Quaker physician. Medicine, science and the Quakers: the "Puritanism-science" debate reconsidered. Medicine, science and the Quakers: the "Puritanism-science" debate reconsidered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1