立陶宛民事诉讼与仲裁中的证据可采性概念

Teise Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.15388/teise.2022.122.4
Jurgis Bartkus
{"title":"立陶宛民事诉讼与仲裁中的证据可采性概念","authors":"Jurgis Bartkus","doi":"10.15388/teise.2022.122.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the concept of admissibility of evidence in Lithuanian civil proceedings and arbitration. The first part of the article reviews the past and current legislation, case law and doctrine, which reveal the concepts of the admissibility of evidence in both civil and arbitral proceedings.The second part of the article provides a critical assessment of these concepts. It is proposed to improve the concept of the admissibility of evidence in civil proceedings, and an alternative of this concept is presented. As far as arbitration law is concerned, it is acknowledged that the concept of the admissibility of evidence in arbitration causes legal uncertainty in the proceedings, which forces to consider possible corrections to this concept.","PeriodicalId":33051,"journal":{"name":"Teise","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of the Admissibility of Evidence in Lithuanian Civil Procedure and Arbitration\",\"authors\":\"Jurgis Bartkus\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/teise.2022.122.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the concept of admissibility of evidence in Lithuanian civil proceedings and arbitration. The first part of the article reviews the past and current legislation, case law and doctrine, which reveal the concepts of the admissibility of evidence in both civil and arbitral proceedings.The second part of the article provides a critical assessment of these concepts. It is proposed to improve the concept of the admissibility of evidence in civil proceedings, and an alternative of this concept is presented. As far as arbitration law is concerned, it is acknowledged that the concept of the admissibility of evidence in arbitration causes legal uncertainty in the proceedings, which forces to consider possible corrections to this concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teise\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2022.122.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2022.122.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了立陶宛民事诉讼和仲裁中证据可采性的概念。文章的第一部分回顾了过去和现在的立法、判例法和理论,揭示了民事和仲裁程序中证据可采性的概念。本文的第二部分对这些概念进行了批判性的评估。提出了完善民事诉讼中证据可采性概念的建议,并提出了可采性概念的替代方案。就仲裁法而言,公认的是,仲裁中证据可采性的概念在诉讼程序中造成法律上的不确定性,这迫使人们考虑对这一概念进行可能的修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Concept of the Admissibility of Evidence in Lithuanian Civil Procedure and Arbitration
This article analyzes the concept of admissibility of evidence in Lithuanian civil proceedings and arbitration. The first part of the article reviews the past and current legislation, case law and doctrine, which reveal the concepts of the admissibility of evidence in both civil and arbitral proceedings.The second part of the article provides a critical assessment of these concepts. It is proposed to improve the concept of the admissibility of evidence in civil proceedings, and an alternative of this concept is presented. As far as arbitration law is concerned, it is acknowledged that the concept of the admissibility of evidence in arbitration causes legal uncertainty in the proceedings, which forces to consider possible corrections to this concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Consumer Law and Environmental Protection: Consumer Sales Directive 2019/771 Example The Doctrine of Provocation Defence and a Murder Based on Jealousy Lay Evaluations of Restraints and Prohibitions During the 1st, 2nd, and 4th Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Lithuania New European Union’s Regulatory Framework of the Digital Space: the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act The Effect of Time Pressure on Criminal Decision-Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1