诱发电位同步检测驱动高信息传输速率混合脑机接口的应用

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Advanced Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.14326/ABE.10.58
Akshay Katyal, R. Singla
{"title":"诱发电位同步检测驱动高信息传输速率混合脑机接口的应用","authors":"Akshay Katyal, R. Singla","doi":"10.14326/ABE.10.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) recently have been focusing on combining various BCI modalities to form different combinations of hybrid BCIs. These paradigms are designed to elicit more than one brain potential in the form of BCI features. This research is being carried out with the objective of increasing classification accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR) based on measurement of brain potentials. This study proposed a novel hybrid BCI elicitation and measurement technique combining steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) and P300 potentials to increase the ITR. The hybrid BCI also increased the number of target options compared to SSVEP paradigm for a set number of presumed frequencies of flickering. One of the hybrid BCIs used distinct colours along with distinct flickering frequencies for targets, with an aim to increase the accuracy of classification and reduction of system uncertainty parameter known as false activation rate (FAR). The results of a study in 10 volunteers established that the novel SSVEP-P300 hybrid BCI with distinct colours for target frequencies had average parameters as follows: classification accuracy of 90.76%, ITR of 81.10 bits / min and FAR of 2.99%. A comparative study of the two novel paradigms with SSVEP and P300 paradigms in the same environment was conducted. The results of the comparative study concluded that the hybrid BCI with distinct colours for various target frequencies yielded the best results and hence can be considered as a viable paradigm option for the development of an assistive device.","PeriodicalId":54017,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synchronized Detection of Evoked Potentials to Drive a High Information Transfer Rate Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Application\",\"authors\":\"Akshay Katyal, R. Singla\",\"doi\":\"10.14326/ABE.10.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) recently have been focusing on combining various BCI modalities to form different combinations of hybrid BCIs. These paradigms are designed to elicit more than one brain potential in the form of BCI features. This research is being carried out with the objective of increasing classification accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR) based on measurement of brain potentials. This study proposed a novel hybrid BCI elicitation and measurement technique combining steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) and P300 potentials to increase the ITR. The hybrid BCI also increased the number of target options compared to SSVEP paradigm for a set number of presumed frequencies of flickering. One of the hybrid BCIs used distinct colours along with distinct flickering frequencies for targets, with an aim to increase the accuracy of classification and reduction of system uncertainty parameter known as false activation rate (FAR). The results of a study in 10 volunteers established that the novel SSVEP-P300 hybrid BCI with distinct colours for target frequencies had average parameters as follows: classification accuracy of 90.76%, ITR of 81.10 bits / min and FAR of 2.99%. A comparative study of the two novel paradigms with SSVEP and P300 paradigms in the same environment was conducted. The results of the comparative study concluded that the hybrid BCI with distinct colours for various target frequencies yielded the best results and hence can be considered as a viable paradigm option for the development of an assistive device.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14326/ABE.10.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14326/ABE.10.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,脑机接口(BCI)研究的重点是将不同的脑机接口模式结合起来,形成不同的混合脑机接口组合。这些范例旨在以脑机接口特征的形式引出不止一种大脑潜能。本研究的目的是在脑电位测量的基础上提高分类准确率和信息传递率。本研究提出了一种结合稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)和P300电位的新型混合脑机接口激发和测量技术,以提高ITR。与SSVEP模式相比,混合脑机接口在一定数量的假定闪烁频率下也增加了目标选项的数量。其中一种混合脑机接口使用不同的颜色和不同的闪烁频率作为目标,目的是提高分类的准确性和减少系统的不确定性参数,即误激活率(FAR)。对10名志愿者的研究结果表明,新型SSVEP-P300混合脑机接口具有不同颜色的目标频率,其平均参数如下:分类准确率为90.76%,ITR为81.10 bits / min, FAR为2.99%。将两种新范式与SSVEP和P300范式在同一环境下进行比较研究。对比研究的结果表明,不同目标频率的不同颜色的混合脑机接口产生了最好的结果,因此可以被认为是辅助装置开发的可行范例选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synchronized Detection of Evoked Potentials to Drive a High Information Transfer Rate Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Application
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) recently have been focusing on combining various BCI modalities to form different combinations of hybrid BCIs. These paradigms are designed to elicit more than one brain potential in the form of BCI features. This research is being carried out with the objective of increasing classification accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR) based on measurement of brain potentials. This study proposed a novel hybrid BCI elicitation and measurement technique combining steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) and P300 potentials to increase the ITR. The hybrid BCI also increased the number of target options compared to SSVEP paradigm for a set number of presumed frequencies of flickering. One of the hybrid BCIs used distinct colours along with distinct flickering frequencies for targets, with an aim to increase the accuracy of classification and reduction of system uncertainty parameter known as false activation rate (FAR). The results of a study in 10 volunteers established that the novel SSVEP-P300 hybrid BCI with distinct colours for target frequencies had average parameters as follows: classification accuracy of 90.76%, ITR of 81.10 bits / min and FAR of 2.99%. A comparative study of the two novel paradigms with SSVEP and P300 paradigms in the same environment was conducted. The results of the comparative study concluded that the hybrid BCI with distinct colours for various target frequencies yielded the best results and hence can be considered as a viable paradigm option for the development of an assistive device.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Biomedical Engineering
Advanced Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
SATORI: Amplification-free digital RNA detection method for the diagnosis of viral infections. Basic Investigation of the Effect of Insole Shape on Leg Skeletal Muscle Mass and Pressure Changes during Walking Investigating Mental Task Combination for Brain-Computer Interface Based on Brain State Discrimination Using Subjective Ratings Development of Beat Analysis Software for the Non-invasive Evaluation of Cardiac Constructs Fabricated with a Three-dimensional Bioprinter Transepidermal Water Loss Estimation Model for Evaluating Skin Barrier Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1