基于agent的SOAP笔记书写支持系统的设计——基于视频调查的内容分析

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Advanced Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.14326/abe.9.146
Lukman Heryawan, P. Khotimah, Osamu Sugiyama, Goshiro Yamamoto, Luciano H. O. Santos, Angga Eko Pramono, K. Okamoto, T. Kuroda
{"title":"基于agent的SOAP笔记书写支持系统的设计——基于视频调查的内容分析","authors":"Lukman Heryawan, P. Khotimah, Osamu Sugiyama, Goshiro Yamamoto, Luciano H. O. Santos, Angga Eko Pramono, K. Okamoto, T. Kuroda","doi":"10.14326/abe.9.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) notes are widely used by physicians to document clinical reasoning in assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients. SOAP notes are also used in medical coding tasks for reimbursement of insurance claims. In Indonesia, medical coders who are independent from physicians assess SOAP notes to assign diagnostic codes and medical procedure codes based on the corresponding International Classification of Diseases standards. Discrepancies between physicians who write the SOAP notes and coders who assign diagnoses and treatments, may occur. These discrepancies were assessed by performing a video-based survey to understand the coder ʼ s perspective, allowing the development of a writing support system to achieve unproblematic SOAP notes. This survey found that problematic SOAP notes were not caused by a single problem but by multiple problems. Abbreviations used by physicians are the major problem in assigning diagnostic codes, whereas incomplete data are the major problem in determining planning. This survey also showed that problematic SOAP notes may contain helpful keywords for coders that can help in determining diagnosis and treatment. The findings show that the system should be able to recognize separate sections of the SOAP note to provide writing support features and identify helpful keywords to encourage physicians to write unproblematic SOAP notes.","PeriodicalId":54017,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Design of an Agent-based Writing Support System for the SOAP Note: A Content Analysis of the Video-based Survey\",\"authors\":\"Lukman Heryawan, P. Khotimah, Osamu Sugiyama, Goshiro Yamamoto, Luciano H. O. Santos, Angga Eko Pramono, K. Okamoto, T. Kuroda\",\"doi\":\"10.14326/abe.9.146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) notes are widely used by physicians to document clinical reasoning in assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients. SOAP notes are also used in medical coding tasks for reimbursement of insurance claims. In Indonesia, medical coders who are independent from physicians assess SOAP notes to assign diagnostic codes and medical procedure codes based on the corresponding International Classification of Diseases standards. Discrepancies between physicians who write the SOAP notes and coders who assign diagnoses and treatments, may occur. These discrepancies were assessed by performing a video-based survey to understand the coder ʼ s perspective, allowing the development of a writing support system to achieve unproblematic SOAP notes. This survey found that problematic SOAP notes were not caused by a single problem but by multiple problems. Abbreviations used by physicians are the major problem in assigning diagnostic codes, whereas incomplete data are the major problem in determining planning. This survey also showed that problematic SOAP notes may contain helpful keywords for coders that can help in determining diagnosis and treatment. The findings show that the system should be able to recognize separate sections of the SOAP note to provide writing support features and identify helpful keywords to encourage physicians to write unproblematic SOAP notes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14326/abe.9.146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14326/abe.9.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

主观、客观、评估和计划(SOAP)笔记被医生广泛用于记录评估、诊断和治疗患者的临床推理。SOAP注释也用于医疗编码任务,以报销保险索赔。在印度尼西亚,独立于医生的医疗编码人员评估SOAP注释,根据相应的国际疾病分类标准分配诊断代码和医疗程序代码。写SOAP记录的医生和分配诊断和治疗的编码员之间可能会出现差异。通过执行基于视频的调查来评估这些差异,以了解编码人员的观点,从而允许编写支持系统的开发来实现无问题的SOAP注释。这项调查发现,有问题的SOAP记录不是由单个问题引起的,而是由多个问题引起的。医生使用的缩写是分配诊断代码的主要问题,而数据不完整是决定计划的主要问题。该调查还表明,有问题的SOAP记录可能包含对编码人员有帮助的关键字,这些关键字可以帮助确定诊断和治疗。研究结果表明,该系统应该能够识别SOAP记录的各个部分,以提供书写支持功能,并识别有用的关键字,以鼓励医生撰写无问题的SOAP记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward Design of an Agent-based Writing Support System for the SOAP Note: A Content Analysis of the Video-based Survey
Subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) notes are widely used by physicians to document clinical reasoning in assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients. SOAP notes are also used in medical coding tasks for reimbursement of insurance claims. In Indonesia, medical coders who are independent from physicians assess SOAP notes to assign diagnostic codes and medical procedure codes based on the corresponding International Classification of Diseases standards. Discrepancies between physicians who write the SOAP notes and coders who assign diagnoses and treatments, may occur. These discrepancies were assessed by performing a video-based survey to understand the coder ʼ s perspective, allowing the development of a writing support system to achieve unproblematic SOAP notes. This survey found that problematic SOAP notes were not caused by a single problem but by multiple problems. Abbreviations used by physicians are the major problem in assigning diagnostic codes, whereas incomplete data are the major problem in determining planning. This survey also showed that problematic SOAP notes may contain helpful keywords for coders that can help in determining diagnosis and treatment. The findings show that the system should be able to recognize separate sections of the SOAP note to provide writing support features and identify helpful keywords to encourage physicians to write unproblematic SOAP notes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Biomedical Engineering
Advanced Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
SATORI: Amplification-free digital RNA detection method for the diagnosis of viral infections. Basic Investigation of the Effect of Insole Shape on Leg Skeletal Muscle Mass and Pressure Changes during Walking Investigating Mental Task Combination for Brain-Computer Interface Based on Brain State Discrimination Using Subjective Ratings Development of Beat Analysis Software for the Non-invasive Evaluation of Cardiac Constructs Fabricated with a Three-dimensional Bioprinter Transepidermal Water Loss Estimation Model for Evaluating Skin Barrier Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1