泰勒·谢里丹很抱歉,但他的角色不会

IF 0.6 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION FILM QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1525/fq.2022.76.2.78
R. Wanzo
{"title":"泰勒·谢里丹很抱歉,但他的角色不会","authors":"R. Wanzo","doi":"10.1525/fq.2022.76.2.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"FQ columnist Rebecca Wanzo examines the complex and contradictory politics of Taylor Sheridan’s Westerns, focusing on the popular Paramount+ series Yellowstone. While often described as “red-state television”—referring to both its location and the presumed audience demographics—Yellowstone has conservative diegetic logic at the same time as it depicts white supremacists as antagonists and critiques racial profiling. Yellowstone’s “messiness” suggests to Wanzo that it may be time to acknowledge that there are some contexts in which the category of “conservative” may not do analytical justice to the complicated ways in which pleasure, genre history, and politics work.","PeriodicalId":45540,"journal":{"name":"FILM QUARTERLY","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taylor Sheridan Is Sorry but His Characters Are Not\",\"authors\":\"R. Wanzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/fq.2022.76.2.78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"FQ columnist Rebecca Wanzo examines the complex and contradictory politics of Taylor Sheridan’s Westerns, focusing on the popular Paramount+ series Yellowstone. While often described as “red-state television”—referring to both its location and the presumed audience demographics—Yellowstone has conservative diegetic logic at the same time as it depicts white supremacists as antagonists and critiques racial profiling. Yellowstone’s “messiness” suggests to Wanzo that it may be time to acknowledge that there are some contexts in which the category of “conservative” may not do analytical justice to the complicated ways in which pleasure, genre history, and politics work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FILM QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FILM QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2022.76.2.78\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILM QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2022.76.2.78","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

FQ专栏作家丽贝卡·万佐分析了泰勒·谢里丹的西部片中复杂而矛盾的政治,重点是广受欢迎的派拉蒙+系列《黄石公园》。虽然经常被描述为“红州电视”——指的是它的位置和假定的观众人口统计——黄石公园在把白人至上主义者描绘成敌人和批评种族定性的同时,也有保守的叙事逻辑。黄石公园的“混乱”向万佐表明,也许是时候承认,在某些情况下,“保守”的类别可能无法对快乐、类型历史和政治的复杂方式进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taylor Sheridan Is Sorry but His Characters Are Not
FQ columnist Rebecca Wanzo examines the complex and contradictory politics of Taylor Sheridan’s Westerns, focusing on the popular Paramount+ series Yellowstone. While often described as “red-state television”—referring to both its location and the presumed audience demographics—Yellowstone has conservative diegetic logic at the same time as it depicts white supremacists as antagonists and critiques racial profiling. Yellowstone’s “messiness” suggests to Wanzo that it may be time to acknowledge that there are some contexts in which the category of “conservative” may not do analytical justice to the complicated ways in which pleasure, genre history, and politics work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FILM QUARTERLY
FILM QUARTERLY FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Film Quarterly has been publishing substantial, peer-reviewed writing on motion pictures since 1958, earning a reputation as the most authoritative academic film journal in the United States. Its wide array of topics, perspectives, and approaches appeals to film scholars and film buffs alike. If you love all types of movies and are eager to encounter new ways of thinking about them, then Film Quarterly is the journal for you! Scholarly analyses of international cinemas, current blockbusters and Hollywood classics, documentaries, animation, and independent, avant-garde, and experimental film and video fill the pages of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Millennial Messiahs, Female Fixers, and Corporate Boards Review: Kill the Documentary: A Letter to Filmmakers, Students, and Scholars, by Jill Godmilow Review: Pleading the Blood: Bill Gunn’s “Ganja & Hess,” by Christopher Sieving Review: Cruisy, Sleepy, Melancholy: Sexual Disorientation in the Films of Tsai Ming-liang, by Nicholas de Villiers Review: Feminista Frequencies: Community Building through Radio in the Yakima Valley, by Monica De La Torre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1