泰勒和海德格尔对投射主义价值解释及其潜在的自然主义本体论的批判

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Anuario Filosofico Pub Date : 2023-04-21 DOI:10.15581/009.56.2.005
Min Seol
{"title":"泰勒和海德格尔对投射主义价值解释及其潜在的自然主义本体论的批判","authors":"Min Seol","doi":"10.15581/009.56.2.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Sources of the Self, Charles Taylor critiques the projectionist account of values and its underlying naturalistic ontology. Likewise, in Being and Time, Martin Heidegger demonstrates that the strata theoretical explanation of practical things invested with values does not adequately describe our experience of them. I aim to demonstrate that if we read these criticisms together, we find ourselves in a better position to reveal the reality of a practical and ethical life. Taylor himself raises the question of what we are committed ontologically in our ethical commitments, but does not develop an answer. Heidegger’s ontological notion of the world in Being and Time could provide a partial answer.","PeriodicalId":42698,"journal":{"name":"Anuario Filosofico","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taylor and Heidegger’s Critiques of the Projectionist Account of Values and Its Underlying Naturalistic Ontology\",\"authors\":\"Min Seol\",\"doi\":\"10.15581/009.56.2.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Sources of the Self, Charles Taylor critiques the projectionist account of values and its underlying naturalistic ontology. Likewise, in Being and Time, Martin Heidegger demonstrates that the strata theoretical explanation of practical things invested with values does not adequately describe our experience of them. I aim to demonstrate that if we read these criticisms together, we find ourselves in a better position to reveal the reality of a practical and ethical life. Taylor himself raises the question of what we are committed ontologically in our ethical commitments, but does not develop an answer. Heidegger’s ontological notion of the world in Being and Time could provide a partial answer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario Filosofico\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario Filosofico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15581/009.56.2.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario Filosofico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15581/009.56.2.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《自我的来源》一书中,查尔斯·泰勒批判了投射主义对价值的解释及其潜在的自然主义本体论。同样,在《存在与时间》中,海德格尔论证了对具有价值的实际事物的分层理论解释并不能充分描述我们对它们的体验。我的目的是证明,如果我们一起阅读这些批评,我们会发现自己处于一个更好的位置,以揭示现实和道德生活的现实。泰勒自己提出了我们在伦理行为中本体论上承诺了什么的问题,但没有给出答案。海德格尔在《存在与时间》中关于世界的本体论概念可以提供部分答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taylor and Heidegger’s Critiques of the Projectionist Account of Values and Its Underlying Naturalistic Ontology
In Sources of the Self, Charles Taylor critiques the projectionist account of values and its underlying naturalistic ontology. Likewise, in Being and Time, Martin Heidegger demonstrates that the strata theoretical explanation of practical things invested with values does not adequately describe our experience of them. I aim to demonstrate that if we read these criticisms together, we find ourselves in a better position to reveal the reality of a practical and ethical life. Taylor himself raises the question of what we are committed ontologically in our ethical commitments, but does not develop an answer. Heidegger’s ontological notion of the world in Being and Time could provide a partial answer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anuario Filosofico
Anuario Filosofico PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Anuario Filosófico, first published in 1968, is one of the most influential philosophical journals in the Spanish-speaking world. Since its beginning, it has published the work of a significant number of both Spanish and foreign philosophers, including Jan A. Aertsen, Elizabeth Anscombe, Werner Beierwaltes, Michael Dummett, Peter Geach, Susan Haack, Friedrich Kaulbach, Ralph McInerny, Antonio Millán-Puelles, Giovanni Reale and Robert Spaemann.
期刊最新文献
SELLÉS, JUAN FERNANDO, Los actuales métodos filosóficos: Pragmatismo, Fenomenología, Filosofía analítica, Hermenéutica. Síntesis y revisión desde L. Polo, Sindéresis, Madrid, 2022, 991 pp. VAN DER HEIDEN, GERT-JAN, The Voice of Misery. A Continental Philosophy of Testimony, State University of New York Press, New York, 2020, 350 pp. HITZ, ZENA, Pensativos. Los placeres ocultos de la vida intelectual, Encuentro, Madrid, 2022, 243 pp. LEHNER, ULRICH L., Innovation in Early Modern Catholicism, Routledge, London – New York, 2021, 201 pp. IBRI, IVO ASSAD, Semiotics and pragmatism. Theoretical Interfaces, Springer, Cham, 2022, 341 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1