评估胸痛患者从急诊科门口到心电图检查时间的差异

IF 2.7 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Womens Health Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.15406/mojwh.2020.09.00263
Laurie A Boge, Wyatt C, S. Dr, Cecilia M, Cubeddu Lx, Escolar E, Goldszer Rc, Farcy Da
{"title":"评估胸痛患者从急诊科门口到心电图检查时间的差异","authors":"Laurie A Boge, Wyatt C, S. Dr, Cecilia M, Cubeddu Lx, Escolar E, Goldszer Rc, Farcy Da","doi":"10.15406/mojwh.2020.09.00263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: For patients presenting to an emergency department with a chief complaint of chest pain, current American Heart Association guidelines recommend that time from emergency department arrival to completion of electrocardiogram be 10 minutes or less. The aim of this study is to evaluate if differences still exist amongst a diverse patient population presenting to a busy urban emergency department with a chief complaint of chest pain. Methods: This retrospective study looked at 3,419 patients who presented to the Emergency Department with any complaint of chest pain during the medical screening examination. Arrival time and time of first electrocardiogram along with age, gender, race, ethnicity and primary language were extracted from electronic health records. Results: For all patients, the mean time to electrocardiogram was 12.5 minutes (95% CI: 12.1-12.7) and 49.9% of all patients received an electrocardiogram within 10 minutes of arrival. Mean time for men was 11.6 minutes and for women 13.3 minutes (P<0.0001); in addition 54% of men and 44.4% of women had electrocardiogram done within 10 minutes of arrival (P<0.0001). No differences were found with regards to primary language, race or ethnicity of patients. Mean time to electrocardiogram for patients less than 40 years old was 14.6 minutes, which was significantly longer than patients equal or older than 40 years, who’s mean time was 11.9 minutes (p<0.0001). The effect of age was observed across gender, race, ethnicity and primary language spoken by the patients. Conclusions: Patient presenting to the emergency department with chest pain are subject to several biases that potentially create health disparities. In this study we show that younger patients and women had a delay in time to electrocardiogram showing biases are still an issue.","PeriodicalId":47398,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating disparities affecting time from emergency department door to electrocardiogram in chest pain patients\",\"authors\":\"Laurie A Boge, Wyatt C, S. Dr, Cecilia M, Cubeddu Lx, Escolar E, Goldszer Rc, Farcy Da\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/mojwh.2020.09.00263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: For patients presenting to an emergency department with a chief complaint of chest pain, current American Heart Association guidelines recommend that time from emergency department arrival to completion of electrocardiogram be 10 minutes or less. The aim of this study is to evaluate if differences still exist amongst a diverse patient population presenting to a busy urban emergency department with a chief complaint of chest pain. Methods: This retrospective study looked at 3,419 patients who presented to the Emergency Department with any complaint of chest pain during the medical screening examination. Arrival time and time of first electrocardiogram along with age, gender, race, ethnicity and primary language were extracted from electronic health records. Results: For all patients, the mean time to electrocardiogram was 12.5 minutes (95% CI: 12.1-12.7) and 49.9% of all patients received an electrocardiogram within 10 minutes of arrival. Mean time for men was 11.6 minutes and for women 13.3 minutes (P<0.0001); in addition 54% of men and 44.4% of women had electrocardiogram done within 10 minutes of arrival (P<0.0001). No differences were found with regards to primary language, race or ethnicity of patients. Mean time to electrocardiogram for patients less than 40 years old was 14.6 minutes, which was significantly longer than patients equal or older than 40 years, who’s mean time was 11.9 minutes (p<0.0001). The effect of age was observed across gender, race, ethnicity and primary language spoken by the patients. Conclusions: Patient presenting to the emergency department with chest pain are subject to several biases that potentially create health disparities. In this study we show that younger patients and women had a delay in time to electrocardiogram showing biases are still an issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/mojwh.2020.09.00263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/mojwh.2020.09.00263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:对于以胸痛为主诉到急诊科就诊的患者,目前美国心脏协会指南建议从急诊科到完成心电图检查的时间不超过10分钟。本研究的目的是评估在繁忙的城市急诊科以胸痛为主诉的不同患者群体之间是否仍然存在差异。方法:这项回顾性研究调查了3,419例在医学筛查检查期间以胸痛主诉就诊于急诊科的患者。从电子病历中提取到达时间和首次心电图时间以及年龄、性别、种族、民族和主要语言。结果:所有患者的平均心电图时间为12.5分钟(95% CI: 12.1-12.7), 49.9%的患者在到达后10分钟内接受心电图检查。男性的平均时间为11.6分钟,女性为13.3分钟(P<0.0001);此外,54%的男性和44.4%的女性在到达后10分钟内做了心电图(P<0.0001)。在患者的主要语言、种族或民族方面没有发现差异。40岁以下患者平均到心电图时间为14.6分钟,明显长于40岁及以上患者的11.9分钟(p<0.0001)。年龄的影响在性别、种族、民族和患者的主要语言中被观察到。结论:以胸痛就诊于急诊科的患者受到几种可能造成健康差异的偏见的影响。在这项研究中,我们发现年轻患者和女性在心电图上的时间延迟仍然是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating disparities affecting time from emergency department door to electrocardiogram in chest pain patients
Introduction: For patients presenting to an emergency department with a chief complaint of chest pain, current American Heart Association guidelines recommend that time from emergency department arrival to completion of electrocardiogram be 10 minutes or less. The aim of this study is to evaluate if differences still exist amongst a diverse patient population presenting to a busy urban emergency department with a chief complaint of chest pain. Methods: This retrospective study looked at 3,419 patients who presented to the Emergency Department with any complaint of chest pain during the medical screening examination. Arrival time and time of first electrocardiogram along with age, gender, race, ethnicity and primary language were extracted from electronic health records. Results: For all patients, the mean time to electrocardiogram was 12.5 minutes (95% CI: 12.1-12.7) and 49.9% of all patients received an electrocardiogram within 10 minutes of arrival. Mean time for men was 11.6 minutes and for women 13.3 minutes (P<0.0001); in addition 54% of men and 44.4% of women had electrocardiogram done within 10 minutes of arrival (P<0.0001). No differences were found with regards to primary language, race or ethnicity of patients. Mean time to electrocardiogram for patients less than 40 years old was 14.6 minutes, which was significantly longer than patients equal or older than 40 years, who’s mean time was 11.9 minutes (p<0.0001). The effect of age was observed across gender, race, ethnicity and primary language spoken by the patients. Conclusions: Patient presenting to the emergency department with chest pain are subject to several biases that potentially create health disparities. In this study we show that younger patients and women had a delay in time to electrocardiogram showing biases are still an issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Womens Health
Womens Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: For many diseases, women’s physiology and life-cycle hormonal changes demand important consideration when determining healthcare management options. Age- and gender-related factors can directly affect treatment outcomes, and differences between the clinical management of, say, an adolescent female and that in a pre- or postmenopausal patient may be either subtle or profound. At the same time, there are certain conditions that are far more prevalent in women than men, and these may require special attention. Furthermore, in an increasingly aged population in which women demonstrate a greater life-expectancy.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and determinants of the involvement of married men in family planning services in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis A survey of women’s experiences of using period tracker applications: Attitudes, ovulation prediction and how the accuracy of the app in predicting period start dates affects their feelings and behaviours ‘It feels like my visibility matters’: Women ageing with HIV overcoming the ‘violence of invisibility’ through community, advocacy and the radical act of care for others HIV prevention – Challenges in reaching Libyan women: A narrative review Multilevel analysis of factors associated with utilization of institutional delivery in Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1