世界非金伯利岩与乌克兰新近纪砂中钻石的比较分析

IF 0.5 Q4 MINERALOGY Mineralogical Journal-Ukraine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.15407/mineraljournal.45.01.095
V. Kvasnytsya
{"title":"世界非金伯利岩与乌克兰新近纪砂中钻石的比较分析","authors":"V. Kvasnytsya","doi":"10.15407/mineraljournal.45.01.095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diamond mineralogy from a number of different non-kimberlitic occurrences of the world was analyzed and a comparison to diamonds from Neogene placers of Ukraine was made. Diamonds from lamprophyres of the Canadian Shield, metakomatiites of the Guiana and West African Shields, and ultra-metamorphic rocks in Asian, European and African continental occurrences were considered. In general, Ukrainian Neogene placer diamonds have many similar mineralogical features to diamonds from lamprophyres and metakomatiites, which differ little from diamonds from kimberlites and lamproites. Ukrainian placer diamonds are characterized by their micron sizes (≤0.5 mm), many of them are colored and have a cubic habit and nitrogen-free compositions, relatively frequent spectral Ib and Iаb types, and orange photoluminescence behavior. In addition, many diamonds are characterized by a relatively high content of hydrocarbons (i.e., CH2, CH3 groups and bonds >C=CH2), OH groups, also C=O, N-H, CO3, NO3-groups. This is evidence for a volatile-rich environment during the diamond crystallization. The formation of diamonds from lamprophyres and metakomatiites, as well as from kimberlites and lamproites, occurred under mantle temperatures and pressures. The relatively recently discovered diamond-bearing lamprophyres and metakomatiites have a number of similarities. They are: i) both formed on the edges of Archean cratonic structures, ii) their old ages (2.7 billion years ago and 1.83 billion years ago for the lamprophyres and 2.2 billion years ago for the metakomatiites), iii) both are strongly metamorphosed, iv) both contain many fragments of rocks of various origins, v) both contain rare xenograins of mantle minerals having diamond-bearing peridotite and eclogite associations, and vi) the diamonds themselves are often microcrystals and many are colored and have a cubic habit. The main difference between diamonds from the lamprophyres and metakomatiites is in their carbon isotopic signatures and their thermal history in the mantle. This is expressed by their different nitrogen contents and the different degree of its aggregation. Diamond-bearing ultrametamorphic rocks are mainly Paleozoic-Mesozoic in age (i.e., 531-92 million years) and occupy a tectonic setting at convergent plate boundaries unlike diamond-bearing lamprophyres and metakomatiites. Diamonds from ultrametamorphic rocks differ from diamonds from lamprophyres and metakomatiites as well as from Ukrainian placer diamonds from Neogene sands in a number of ways.","PeriodicalId":53834,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogical Journal-Ukraine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIAMONDS IN NON-KIMBERLITIC ROCKS OF THE WORLD AND NEOGENE SANDS OF UKRAINE\",\"authors\":\"V. Kvasnytsya\",\"doi\":\"10.15407/mineraljournal.45.01.095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The diamond mineralogy from a number of different non-kimberlitic occurrences of the world was analyzed and a comparison to diamonds from Neogene placers of Ukraine was made. Diamonds from lamprophyres of the Canadian Shield, metakomatiites of the Guiana and West African Shields, and ultra-metamorphic rocks in Asian, European and African continental occurrences were considered. In general, Ukrainian Neogene placer diamonds have many similar mineralogical features to diamonds from lamprophyres and metakomatiites, which differ little from diamonds from kimberlites and lamproites. Ukrainian placer diamonds are characterized by their micron sizes (≤0.5 mm), many of them are colored and have a cubic habit and nitrogen-free compositions, relatively frequent spectral Ib and Iаb types, and orange photoluminescence behavior. In addition, many diamonds are characterized by a relatively high content of hydrocarbons (i.e., CH2, CH3 groups and bonds >C=CH2), OH groups, also C=O, N-H, CO3, NO3-groups. This is evidence for a volatile-rich environment during the diamond crystallization. The formation of diamonds from lamprophyres and metakomatiites, as well as from kimberlites and lamproites, occurred under mantle temperatures and pressures. The relatively recently discovered diamond-bearing lamprophyres and metakomatiites have a number of similarities. They are: i) both formed on the edges of Archean cratonic structures, ii) their old ages (2.7 billion years ago and 1.83 billion years ago for the lamprophyres and 2.2 billion years ago for the metakomatiites), iii) both are strongly metamorphosed, iv) both contain many fragments of rocks of various origins, v) both contain rare xenograins of mantle minerals having diamond-bearing peridotite and eclogite associations, and vi) the diamonds themselves are often microcrystals and many are colored and have a cubic habit. The main difference between diamonds from the lamprophyres and metakomatiites is in their carbon isotopic signatures and their thermal history in the mantle. This is expressed by their different nitrogen contents and the different degree of its aggregation. Diamond-bearing ultrametamorphic rocks are mainly Paleozoic-Mesozoic in age (i.e., 531-92 million years) and occupy a tectonic setting at convergent plate boundaries unlike diamond-bearing lamprophyres and metakomatiites. Diamonds from ultrametamorphic rocks differ from diamonds from lamprophyres and metakomatiites as well as from Ukrainian placer diamonds from Neogene sands in a number of ways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mineralogical Journal-Ukraine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mineralogical Journal-Ukraine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15407/mineraljournal.45.01.095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MINERALOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogical Journal-Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/mineraljournal.45.01.095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MINERALOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对世界上许多不同的非金伯利岩产点的金刚石矿物学进行了分析,并与乌克兰新近纪砂矿的金刚石进行了比较。考虑了来自加拿大地盾的煌斑岩、圭亚那和西非地盾的变质岩以及亚洲、欧洲和非洲大陆的超变质岩的钻石。总的来说,乌克兰新近纪砂矿钻石与煌斑岩和偏长岩钻石具有许多相似的矿物学特征,与金伯利岩和煌斑岩钻石差别不大。乌克兰砂矿钻石的特点是它们的微米大小(≤0.5 mm),其中许多是彩色的,具有立方习性和无氮成分,相对频繁的光谱Ib和i1b类型,以及橙色的光发光行为。此外,许多金刚石的特点是含有较高的碳氢化合物(即CH2、CH3基团和>键C=CH2)、OH基团,还有C=O、N-H、CO3、no3基团。这是钻石结晶过程中挥发物丰富的环境的证据。从煌斑岩和变质岩,以及金伯利岩和煌斑岩中形成钻石,都是在地幔温度和压力下形成的。最近发现的含金刚石煌斑岩与偏长岩有许多相似之处。它们是:i)都形成于太古宙克拉通构造的边缘,ii)它们的年龄(煌斑岩在27亿年前和18.3亿年前,变质岩在22亿年前),iii)它们都是强烈变质的,iv)它们都含有许多不同来源的岩石碎片,v)它们都含有稀有的地幔矿物异种颗粒,具有含金刚石的橄榄岩和榴辉岩组合。6)钻石本身通常是微晶体,许多是彩色的,有立方的习惯。来自煌斑岩和偏长岩的钻石的主要区别在于它们的碳同位素特征和地幔中的热历史。这表现在它们的含氮量和聚集程度不同。含金刚石超变质岩的年龄主要为古生代-中生代(即5.31 -92亿年),与含金刚石煌斑岩和变质岩不同,它们处于板块边界会聚的构造环境。来自超变质岩的钻石与来自煌斑岩和变质岩的钻石以及来自新近纪砂岩的乌克兰砂矿钻石在许多方面都有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIAMONDS IN NON-KIMBERLITIC ROCKS OF THE WORLD AND NEOGENE SANDS OF UKRAINE
The diamond mineralogy from a number of different non-kimberlitic occurrences of the world was analyzed and a comparison to diamonds from Neogene placers of Ukraine was made. Diamonds from lamprophyres of the Canadian Shield, metakomatiites of the Guiana and West African Shields, and ultra-metamorphic rocks in Asian, European and African continental occurrences were considered. In general, Ukrainian Neogene placer diamonds have many similar mineralogical features to diamonds from lamprophyres and metakomatiites, which differ little from diamonds from kimberlites and lamproites. Ukrainian placer diamonds are characterized by their micron sizes (≤0.5 mm), many of them are colored and have a cubic habit and nitrogen-free compositions, relatively frequent spectral Ib and Iаb types, and orange photoluminescence behavior. In addition, many diamonds are characterized by a relatively high content of hydrocarbons (i.e., CH2, CH3 groups and bonds >C=CH2), OH groups, also C=O, N-H, CO3, NO3-groups. This is evidence for a volatile-rich environment during the diamond crystallization. The formation of diamonds from lamprophyres and metakomatiites, as well as from kimberlites and lamproites, occurred under mantle temperatures and pressures. The relatively recently discovered diamond-bearing lamprophyres and metakomatiites have a number of similarities. They are: i) both formed on the edges of Archean cratonic structures, ii) their old ages (2.7 billion years ago and 1.83 billion years ago for the lamprophyres and 2.2 billion years ago for the metakomatiites), iii) both are strongly metamorphosed, iv) both contain many fragments of rocks of various origins, v) both contain rare xenograins of mantle minerals having diamond-bearing peridotite and eclogite associations, and vi) the diamonds themselves are often microcrystals and many are colored and have a cubic habit. The main difference between diamonds from the lamprophyres and metakomatiites is in their carbon isotopic signatures and their thermal history in the mantle. This is expressed by their different nitrogen contents and the different degree of its aggregation. Diamond-bearing ultrametamorphic rocks are mainly Paleozoic-Mesozoic in age (i.e., 531-92 million years) and occupy a tectonic setting at convergent plate boundaries unlike diamond-bearing lamprophyres and metakomatiites. Diamonds from ultrametamorphic rocks differ from diamonds from lamprophyres and metakomatiites as well as from Ukrainian placer diamonds from Neogene sands in a number of ways.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
CURRENT STATE’S CONDITION OF LITHIUM ORE DEPOSITS IN UKRAINE A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIAMONDS IN NON-KIMBERLITIC ROCKS OF THE WORLD AND NEOGENE SANDS OF UKRAINE GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SALTYCHIAN GRANITES (WESTERN AZOV AREA) ACCORDING TO THE ICP-MS RESEARCH RESULTS ECOLOGICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL FEATURES OF MANGANESE DISTRIBUTION IN GROUNDWATERS OF UKRAINE PUMPELLYITE FROM METABASALTS OF THE UKRAINIAN CARPATHIANS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1