埃塞俄比亚中部青尼罗州杰玛盆地滑坡和泥石流的随机评估

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Geografia Fisica E Dinamica Quaternaria Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.15496/PUBLIKATION-17219
M. Maerker, Hochschild, V. Maca, V. Vilímek
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚中部青尼罗州杰玛盆地滑坡和泥石流的随机评估","authors":"M. Maerker, Hochschild, V. Maca, V. Vilímek","doi":"10.15496/PUBLIKATION-17219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we evaluate a stochastic method to assess the spatial distribution of landslide and debris flow processes in the Jemma basin, Central Ethiopia. The Jemma basin is draining the highlands (max. 3.676 m a.s.l.) northeast of Addis Ababa towards the Blue Nile. The basin is characterized by a deeply incised stratigraphy made up of volcanic deposits like flood basalts and tephra. Hence, gravitational mass movements as well as water driven erosion processes occur, documented by the respective forms. We mapped these features using Google Earth images, aerial photo interpretation and fieldwork. The information about the spatial distribution of landslide and debris flow forms was taken as dependent variable in the stochastic modelling approach. Moreover, we performed a detailed terrain analysis to derive the independent variables. We applied two different stochastic modelling approaches based on i) Boosted Regression Trees (BRT) and ii) on an Maximum Entropy Method (MEM) to predict the potential spatial distribution of landslides and debris flows in the Jemma basin. The models are statistically evaluated using the training data and a set of performance parameters such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Variable importance and response curves provide further insight into controlling factors of landslide and debris flow distribution. The study shows that both processes can be perfectly identified and distinguished. The spatial distribution of the predicted process susceptibilities generally follows topographic constraints. Model performance parameters show better results for BRT, that outperforms MEM. However, MEM results are quite robust and hence are used for the spatial prediction of process susceptibilities.","PeriodicalId":49250,"journal":{"name":"Geografia Fisica E Dinamica Quaternaria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stochastic assessment of landslides and debris flows in the Jemma basin, Blue Nile, Central Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"M. Maerker, Hochschild, V. Maca, V. Vilímek\",\"doi\":\"10.15496/PUBLIKATION-17219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we evaluate a stochastic method to assess the spatial distribution of landslide and debris flow processes in the Jemma basin, Central Ethiopia. The Jemma basin is draining the highlands (max. 3.676 m a.s.l.) northeast of Addis Ababa towards the Blue Nile. The basin is characterized by a deeply incised stratigraphy made up of volcanic deposits like flood basalts and tephra. Hence, gravitational mass movements as well as water driven erosion processes occur, documented by the respective forms. We mapped these features using Google Earth images, aerial photo interpretation and fieldwork. The information about the spatial distribution of landslide and debris flow forms was taken as dependent variable in the stochastic modelling approach. Moreover, we performed a detailed terrain analysis to derive the independent variables. We applied two different stochastic modelling approaches based on i) Boosted Regression Trees (BRT) and ii) on an Maximum Entropy Method (MEM) to predict the potential spatial distribution of landslides and debris flows in the Jemma basin. The models are statistically evaluated using the training data and a set of performance parameters such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Variable importance and response curves provide further insight into controlling factors of landslide and debris flow distribution. The study shows that both processes can be perfectly identified and distinguished. The spatial distribution of the predicted process susceptibilities generally follows topographic constraints. Model performance parameters show better results for BRT, that outperforms MEM. However, MEM results are quite robust and hence are used for the spatial prediction of process susceptibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geografia Fisica E Dinamica Quaternaria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geografia Fisica E Dinamica Quaternaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15496/PUBLIKATION-17219\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geografia Fisica E Dinamica Quaternaria","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15496/PUBLIKATION-17219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在本文中,我们评估了一种随机方法来评估在杰玛盆地,埃塞俄比亚中部滑坡和泥石流过程的空间分布。杰玛盆地正在使高地干涸。海拔3.676米),位于亚的斯亚贝巴东北部,朝向青尼罗河。该盆地的特点是由洪水玄武岩和火山岩等火山沉积物组成的深切口地层。因此,重力质量运动和水驱动的侵蚀过程都发生了,并以各自的形式记录下来。我们利用谷歌地球图像、航空照片解译和实地调查绘制了这些特征。在随机建模方法中,将滑坡和泥石流形态的空间分布信息作为因变量。此外,我们进行了详细的地形分析,以导出自变量。采用基于增强回归树(boosting Regression Trees, BRT)和基于最大熵法(Maximum Entropy Method, MEM)的两种随机建模方法对Jemma盆地滑坡和泥石流的潜在空间分布进行了预测。使用训练数据和一组性能参数(如接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUC))对模型进行统计评估。变重要度和响应曲线进一步揭示了滑坡和泥石流分布的控制因素。研究表明,这两个过程都可以很好地识别和区分。预测过程磁化率的空间分布一般受地形约束。模型性能参数显示BRT的效果更好,优于MEM。然而,MEM结果是相当稳健的,因此被用于工艺敏感性的空间预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stochastic assessment of landslides and debris flows in the Jemma basin, Blue Nile, Central Ethiopia
In this paper we evaluate a stochastic method to assess the spatial distribution of landslide and debris flow processes in the Jemma basin, Central Ethiopia. The Jemma basin is draining the highlands (max. 3.676 m a.s.l.) northeast of Addis Ababa towards the Blue Nile. The basin is characterized by a deeply incised stratigraphy made up of volcanic deposits like flood basalts and tephra. Hence, gravitational mass movements as well as water driven erosion processes occur, documented by the respective forms. We mapped these features using Google Earth images, aerial photo interpretation and fieldwork. The information about the spatial distribution of landslide and debris flow forms was taken as dependent variable in the stochastic modelling approach. Moreover, we performed a detailed terrain analysis to derive the independent variables. We applied two different stochastic modelling approaches based on i) Boosted Regression Trees (BRT) and ii) on an Maximum Entropy Method (MEM) to predict the potential spatial distribution of landslides and debris flows in the Jemma basin. The models are statistically evaluated using the training data and a set of performance parameters such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Variable importance and response curves provide further insight into controlling factors of landslide and debris flow distribution. The study shows that both processes can be perfectly identified and distinguished. The spatial distribution of the predicted process susceptibilities generally follows topographic constraints. Model performance parameters show better results for BRT, that outperforms MEM. However, MEM results are quite robust and hence are used for the spatial prediction of process susceptibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: It publishes original papers, short communications, news and book reviews of Physical Geography, Glaciology, Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology. The journal furthermore publishes the annual reports on italian glaciers, the official transactions of the Comitato Glaciologico Italiano and the Newsletters of the International Association of Geomorphologist.
期刊最新文献
Geomorphological detection of surface effects induced by active blind thrusts in the southern Abruzzi peri-adriatic belt (Central Italy) Geomorphological evolution and monitoring of San Bernardino-Guvano coastal landslide (eastern Liguria, Italy) Stochastic assessment of landslides and debris flows in the Jemma basin, Blue Nile, Central Ethiopia Report of the glaciological survey of 2015 Assessment of gully erosion in the Upper Awash, Central Ethiopian highlands based on a comparison of archived aerial photographs and very high resolution satellite images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1