老年人听力筛查策略:文献计量学回顾

Elisangela Rodrigues Brandão, Renan Dantas Aires Guimarães, Maria Júlia Galindo Soares, H. Cavalcanti
{"title":"老年人听力筛查策略:文献计量学回顾","authors":"Elisangela Rodrigues Brandão, Renan Dantas Aires Guimarães, Maria Júlia Galindo Soares, H. Cavalcanti","doi":"10.1590/1982-0216/20232525822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the profile of publications on methods and instruments used to screen older adults hearing. Methods: the scientific production on older adults hearing screening methods, searching for articles published between 2016 and 2022. Data were collected from PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases and the articles were categorized according to their year, study type, authors, and screening instrument. Data were also analyzed to suggest potential aspects to be addressed in future research in the area. Literature Review: altogether, 26 articles were found based on the eligibility criteria. Publications peaked in 2016, followed by 2020. Articles published in the United States predominated (18%), and HHIE-S (hearing handicap inventory for the elderly screening version) was the most used instrument; 90% of the publications were in English, and the most recurrent study type was cross-sectional, followed by instrument validation studies. Conclusion: the review points out the scarcity of scientific production on older adults hearing screening in both national and international research. The studies approached different populations, screening methods, hearing loss definitions, health systems, and public policies in the countries where they were conducted. Better methodologies must be implemented for future research in the area.","PeriodicalId":53238,"journal":{"name":"Revista CEFAC","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Older adults hearing screening strategies: a bibliometric review\",\"authors\":\"Elisangela Rodrigues Brandão, Renan Dantas Aires Guimarães, Maria Júlia Galindo Soares, H. Cavalcanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1982-0216/20232525822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the profile of publications on methods and instruments used to screen older adults hearing. Methods: the scientific production on older adults hearing screening methods, searching for articles published between 2016 and 2022. Data were collected from PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases and the articles were categorized according to their year, study type, authors, and screening instrument. Data were also analyzed to suggest potential aspects to be addressed in future research in the area. Literature Review: altogether, 26 articles were found based on the eligibility criteria. Publications peaked in 2016, followed by 2020. Articles published in the United States predominated (18%), and HHIE-S (hearing handicap inventory for the elderly screening version) was the most used instrument; 90% of the publications were in English, and the most recurrent study type was cross-sectional, followed by instrument validation studies. Conclusion: the review points out the scarcity of scientific production on older adults hearing screening in both national and international research. The studies approached different populations, screening methods, hearing loss definitions, health systems, and public policies in the countries where they were conducted. Better methodologies must be implemented for future research in the area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista CEFAC\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista CEFAC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232525822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CEFAC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232525822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:分析老年人听力筛查方法和仪器的文献资料。方法:科学制作关于老年人听力筛查的方法,检索2016 - 2022年间发表的文章。数据从PubMed、Scopus、LILACS、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar数据库中收集,并根据文章的年份、研究类型、作者和筛选工具进行分类。还对数据进行了分析,以提出在该领域未来研究中需要解决的潜在问题。文献回顾:根据入选标准共找到26篇文献。出版物在2016年达到顶峰,其次是2020年。在美国发表的文章占主导地位(18%),HHIE-S(老年人听力障碍筛查版本)是使用最多的工具;90%的出版物是英文的,最常见的研究类型是横断面研究,其次是工具验证研究。结论:综述指出,国内外在老年人听力筛查方面的研究缺乏科学成果。这些研究涉及不同的人群、筛查方法、听力损失定义、卫生系统和开展研究的国家的公共政策。未来在该领域的研究必须采用更好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Older adults hearing screening strategies: a bibliometric review
ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the profile of publications on methods and instruments used to screen older adults hearing. Methods: the scientific production on older adults hearing screening methods, searching for articles published between 2016 and 2022. Data were collected from PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases and the articles were categorized according to their year, study type, authors, and screening instrument. Data were also analyzed to suggest potential aspects to be addressed in future research in the area. Literature Review: altogether, 26 articles were found based on the eligibility criteria. Publications peaked in 2016, followed by 2020. Articles published in the United States predominated (18%), and HHIE-S (hearing handicap inventory for the elderly screening version) was the most used instrument; 90% of the publications were in English, and the most recurrent study type was cross-sectional, followed by instrument validation studies. Conclusion: the review points out the scarcity of scientific production on older adults hearing screening in both national and international research. The studies approached different populations, screening methods, hearing loss definitions, health systems, and public policies in the countries where they were conducted. Better methodologies must be implemented for future research in the area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Contributions of urban planning for more food security in German cities]. Galvanic vestibular stimulation to improve postural instability, voluntary attention, and quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients Construction and validation of an informative handbook on speech-language-hearing therapy in primary health care Auditory middle latency responses and hearing skills in adults Electromyographic analysis of suprahyoid musculature before and after therapy taping in young women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1