统一性与可比性:对巴西资本市场相关性的分析

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Revista Contabilidade e Financas Pub Date : 2022-01-21 DOI:10.1590/1808-057x202112890
Emanuelle Frasson Guimarães, Suliani Rover
{"title":"统一性与可比性:对巴西资本市场相关性的分析","authors":"Emanuelle Frasson Guimarães, Suliani Rover","doi":"10.1590/1808-057x202112890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This research aimed to analyze the relationship between the characteristics of uniformity and comparability and the fundamental qualitative characteristic of relevance of financial reports for the Brazilian capital market, discussing the possibility of a trade-off between comparability and relevance, the importance of considering both comparability and relevance to maximize the utility of financial statements, and the gaps regarding the “effectiveness” of uniformity and achieving comparability to the detriment of relevance. It is important to investigate the “effectiveness” of uniformity in terms of the utility of the decision due to the confusion that exists between the concepts of uniformity and comparability. The results will encourage regulatory bodies to reflect on the confusion that exists between uniformity and comparability and on fulfilling the characteristics of relevance and comparability, indicating what the relationship is between these from the viewpoint of the capital market. Uniformity is identified by means of the earnings covariance measure and comparability via the accounting function similarity measure. The relevance models are assessed using panel data regressions covering the period from 2013 to 2018. The sample includes companies from the B3S.A. - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão belonging to sectors classified in the Level 2 North American Classification System (NAICS) that comprise at least two companies. The results indicated that uniformity is not relevant for the Brazilian capital market, even when it contributes to comparability. These can be explained by the possible production of superficial comparability. They also revealed that comparability is relevant and positively related to the share price. However, the inclusion of this variable led to a decrease in explanatory power, which may indicate the achievement of comparability to the detriment of relevance. Finally, it is revealed that the Brazilian capital market distinguishes between the concepts of uniformity and comparability when evaluating companies.","PeriodicalId":37984,"journal":{"name":"Revista Contabilidade e Financas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uniformity and comparability: an analysis of the relevance for the Brazilian capital market\",\"authors\":\"Emanuelle Frasson Guimarães, Suliani Rover\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1808-057x202112890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This research aimed to analyze the relationship between the characteristics of uniformity and comparability and the fundamental qualitative characteristic of relevance of financial reports for the Brazilian capital market, discussing the possibility of a trade-off between comparability and relevance, the importance of considering both comparability and relevance to maximize the utility of financial statements, and the gaps regarding the “effectiveness” of uniformity and achieving comparability to the detriment of relevance. It is important to investigate the “effectiveness” of uniformity in terms of the utility of the decision due to the confusion that exists between the concepts of uniformity and comparability. The results will encourage regulatory bodies to reflect on the confusion that exists between uniformity and comparability and on fulfilling the characteristics of relevance and comparability, indicating what the relationship is between these from the viewpoint of the capital market. Uniformity is identified by means of the earnings covariance measure and comparability via the accounting function similarity measure. The relevance models are assessed using panel data regressions covering the period from 2013 to 2018. The sample includes companies from the B3S.A. - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão belonging to sectors classified in the Level 2 North American Classification System (NAICS) that comprise at least two companies. The results indicated that uniformity is not relevant for the Brazilian capital market, even when it contributes to comparability. These can be explained by the possible production of superficial comparability. They also revealed that comparability is relevant and positively related to the share price. However, the inclusion of this variable led to a decrease in explanatory power, which may indicate the achievement of comparability to the detriment of relevance. Finally, it is revealed that the Brazilian capital market distinguishes between the concepts of uniformity and comparability when evaluating companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Contabilidade e Financas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Contabilidade e Financas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202112890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Contabilidade e Financas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202112890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在分析巴西资本市场财务报告的一致性和可比性特征与相关性的基本定性特征之间的关系,讨论可比性和相关性之间权衡的可能性,同时考虑可比性和相关性对财务报表效用最大化的重要性。以及关于一致性的“有效性”和实现可比性而损害相关性的差距。由于统一性和可比性概念之间存在混淆,因此从决策的效用角度研究统一性的“有效性”是很重要的。研究结果将鼓励监管机构反思统一性和可比性之间存在的混淆,以及如何实现相关性和可比性的特征,从资本市场的角度表明两者之间的关系。统一性通过盈余协方差度量和可比性通过会计函数相似性度量来确定。使用涵盖2013年至2018年期间的面板数据回归评估相关性模型。样本包括来自美国的公司。巴西,Bolsa, balc属于2级北美分类系统(NAICS)的行业,至少包括两家公司。结果表明,统一性与巴西资本市场无关,即使它有助于可比性。这可以用可能产生的表面可比性来解释。他们还发现,可比性与股价呈正相关。然而,纳入这一变量导致解释能力下降,这可能表明实现了可比性而损害了相关性。最后,揭示了巴西资本市场在评估公司时区分了统一性和可比性的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uniformity and comparability: an analysis of the relevance for the Brazilian capital market
ABSTRACT This research aimed to analyze the relationship between the characteristics of uniformity and comparability and the fundamental qualitative characteristic of relevance of financial reports for the Brazilian capital market, discussing the possibility of a trade-off between comparability and relevance, the importance of considering both comparability and relevance to maximize the utility of financial statements, and the gaps regarding the “effectiveness” of uniformity and achieving comparability to the detriment of relevance. It is important to investigate the “effectiveness” of uniformity in terms of the utility of the decision due to the confusion that exists between the concepts of uniformity and comparability. The results will encourage regulatory bodies to reflect on the confusion that exists between uniformity and comparability and on fulfilling the characteristics of relevance and comparability, indicating what the relationship is between these from the viewpoint of the capital market. Uniformity is identified by means of the earnings covariance measure and comparability via the accounting function similarity measure. The relevance models are assessed using panel data regressions covering the period from 2013 to 2018. The sample includes companies from the B3S.A. - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão belonging to sectors classified in the Level 2 North American Classification System (NAICS) that comprise at least two companies. The results indicated that uniformity is not relevant for the Brazilian capital market, even when it contributes to comparability. These can be explained by the possible production of superficial comparability. They also revealed that comparability is relevant and positively related to the share price. However, the inclusion of this variable led to a decrease in explanatory power, which may indicate the achievement of comparability to the detriment of relevance. Finally, it is revealed that the Brazilian capital market distinguishes between the concepts of uniformity and comparability when evaluating companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Contabilidade e Financas
Revista Contabilidade e Financas Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (RC&F) publishes inedited theoretical development papers and theoretical-empirical studies in Accounting, Controllership, Actuarial Sciences and Finance. The journal accepts research papers in different paradigms and using various research methods, provided that they are consistent and relevant for the development of these areas. Besides research papers, its main focus, traditional papers and manuscripts in other formats that can contribute to communicate new knowledge to the community are also published.
期刊最新文献
The career sustainability of accountants: a profession in transition The effect on the BTD of IFRS adoption and the end of the Transitional Tax Regime (RTT) in Brazil Control systems and interorganizational identification in technology parks cooperation Effects of informal controls and psychological empowerment on job satisfaction Investment fund selection techniques from the perspective of Brazilian pension funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1