巴西媒体中的疯狂与锚定:社会表征研究

Q3 Social Sciences Paideia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1982-4327e3231
Maria de Fátima de Souza Santos, Renan Harmes Eskinazi
{"title":"巴西媒体中的疯狂与锚定:社会表征研究","authors":"Maria de Fátima de Souza Santos, Renan Harmes Eskinazi","doi":"10.1590/1982-4327e3231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Brawzilian Psychiatric Reform sought to introduce new perspectives on madness, integrating other meanings about mental health; however, it seems that mad and crazy are used in everyday communications to describe social events and behaviors. This study aimed to investigate the main contents and beliefs that anchor the social representations of madness in a printed newspaper. A Thematic Content Analysis was carried out with 846 articles from the newspaper Folha de São Paulo from the years 1978 and 2018. Seven categories were constructed that anchor the idea of madness: Eccentric, Unpredictable, Intense, Irrational, Violent, Subversive, and Transgressive. The stories reinforce the stigma of madness as something divergent, strange. The construction of an inverse anchoring underlies the representations of madness, demarcating the distance between the “normal” and the “crazy. It was concluded that madness is still understood based on social devaluation and demeaning, leading to exclusionary practices.","PeriodicalId":38841,"journal":{"name":"Paideia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Madness and Anchoring in the Brazilian Press: A Study in Social Representation\",\"authors\":\"Maria de Fátima de Souza Santos, Renan Harmes Eskinazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1982-4327e3231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Brawzilian Psychiatric Reform sought to introduce new perspectives on madness, integrating other meanings about mental health; however, it seems that mad and crazy are used in everyday communications to describe social events and behaviors. This study aimed to investigate the main contents and beliefs that anchor the social representations of madness in a printed newspaper. A Thematic Content Analysis was carried out with 846 articles from the newspaper Folha de São Paulo from the years 1978 and 2018. Seven categories were constructed that anchor the idea of madness: Eccentric, Unpredictable, Intense, Irrational, Violent, Subversive, and Transgressive. The stories reinforce the stigma of madness as something divergent, strange. The construction of an inverse anchoring underlies the representations of madness, demarcating the distance between the “normal” and the “crazy. It was concluded that madness is still understood based on social devaluation and demeaning, leading to exclusionary practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paideia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paideia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paideia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】《巴西精神病学改革》试图引入关于疯癫的新视角,整合精神健康的其他含义;然而,mad和crazy似乎在日常交流中用来描述社会事件和行为。本研究旨在探讨报纸对疯狂的社会表征的主要内容和信念。对1978年至2018年《圣保罗页报》的846篇文章进行了主题内容分析。他们构建了七个类别来确定疯狂的概念:古怪的、不可预测的、强烈的、非理性的、暴力的、颠覆的和越轨的。这些故事强化了疯狂的污名,认为它是一种不同的、奇怪的东西。逆向锚定的构建是疯狂表征的基础,划定了“正常”与“疯狂”之间的距离。结论是,疯狂仍然是基于社会的贬低和贬低来理解的,导致了排他性的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Madness and Anchoring in the Brazilian Press: A Study in Social Representation
Abstract The Brawzilian Psychiatric Reform sought to introduce new perspectives on madness, integrating other meanings about mental health; however, it seems that mad and crazy are used in everyday communications to describe social events and behaviors. This study aimed to investigate the main contents and beliefs that anchor the social representations of madness in a printed newspaper. A Thematic Content Analysis was carried out with 846 articles from the newspaper Folha de São Paulo from the years 1978 and 2018. Seven categories were constructed that anchor the idea of madness: Eccentric, Unpredictable, Intense, Irrational, Violent, Subversive, and Transgressive. The stories reinforce the stigma of madness as something divergent, strange. The construction of an inverse anchoring underlies the representations of madness, demarcating the distance between the “normal” and the “crazy. It was concluded that madness is still understood based on social devaluation and demeaning, leading to exclusionary practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Paideia
Paideia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Substance Use Disorder Among Bereaved Individuals: A Systematic Review Morbidities, Self-reported Health, Purpose, and Satisfaction with Life in Older Adults Comparison of Female Body Image Between Models and Non-Models Women Evidence of Validity for the Hierarchical Job Crafting Scale in Brazil Children and Adolescents with Depression: Perception of Family Caregivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1