一项比较每日一次和每日三次纳哌地尔75mg /天治疗良性前列腺增生下尿路症状的随机研究

A. Okumura, S. Tsuritani, T. Nozaki, Hitomi Kimura, T. Kazama
{"title":"一项比较每日一次和每日三次纳哌地尔75mg /天治疗良性前列腺增生下尿路症状的随机研究","authors":"A. Okumura, S. Tsuritani, T. Nozaki, Hitomi Kimura, T. Kazama","doi":"10.14740/WJNU169E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The efficacy and tolerability of naftopidil 75 mg administered once daily (OD) in the evening (g roup O) were compared to those of naftopidil 25 mg thrice daily (TID), given in the morning, afternoon and evening (g roup T), for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). The factors predicting the efficacy of each dosage regimen were also examined. Methods: The participants were 101 patients with LUTS/BPH who were randomly administered naftopidil for 8 weeks in either group O or group T. Inclusion criteria were international prostate symptom score (IPSS) greater than or equal to 8 and IPSS quality of life (IPSS-QoL) greater than or equal to 3. Results: IPSS total score, IPSS-QoL and the BPH impact index were all significantly improved compared to baseline for both groups at 8 weeks after treatment. Voided volume, maximum flow rate and average flow rate were significantly improved compared to baseline only for group O at 8 weeks after treatment. The effectiveness rate based on the criteria for treatment efficacy of the Japanese clinical practice guideline for voiding dysfunction was not significantly different between the two groups. There was no independent predictive factor for the efficacy of naftopidil in group O, but prostate volume and symptom severity were identified as predictive factors in group T. The rate of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The overall efficacy of naftopidil 75 mg/day given OD was approximately equal to that of 75 mg/day TID, but OD therapy was objectively more effective. LUTS/BPH patients with large prostate volume should be given OD therapy because the therapy is not affected by the severity of subjective symptoms or prostate volume. World J Nephrol Urol. 2014;3(2):72-82 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu169e","PeriodicalId":91634,"journal":{"name":"World journal of nephrology and urology","volume":"3 1","pages":"72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Study Comparing Once-Daily and Thrice-Daily Naftopidil 75 mg/Day for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia\",\"authors\":\"A. Okumura, S. Tsuritani, T. Nozaki, Hitomi Kimura, T. Kazama\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/WJNU169E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The efficacy and tolerability of naftopidil 75 mg administered once daily (OD) in the evening (g roup O) were compared to those of naftopidil 25 mg thrice daily (TID), given in the morning, afternoon and evening (g roup T), for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). The factors predicting the efficacy of each dosage regimen were also examined. Methods: The participants were 101 patients with LUTS/BPH who were randomly administered naftopidil for 8 weeks in either group O or group T. Inclusion criteria were international prostate symptom score (IPSS) greater than or equal to 8 and IPSS quality of life (IPSS-QoL) greater than or equal to 3. Results: IPSS total score, IPSS-QoL and the BPH impact index were all significantly improved compared to baseline for both groups at 8 weeks after treatment. Voided volume, maximum flow rate and average flow rate were significantly improved compared to baseline only for group O at 8 weeks after treatment. The effectiveness rate based on the criteria for treatment efficacy of the Japanese clinical practice guideline for voiding dysfunction was not significantly different between the two groups. There was no independent predictive factor for the efficacy of naftopidil in group O, but prostate volume and symptom severity were identified as predictive factors in group T. The rate of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The overall efficacy of naftopidil 75 mg/day given OD was approximately equal to that of 75 mg/day TID, but OD therapy was objectively more effective. LUTS/BPH patients with large prostate volume should be given OD therapy because the therapy is not affected by the severity of subjective symptoms or prostate volume. World J Nephrol Urol. 2014;3(2):72-82 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu169e\",\"PeriodicalId\":91634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of nephrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"72-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of nephrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/WJNU169E\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of nephrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/WJNU169E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:比较纳托地尔75 mg每天一次(OD)晚上给药(g O组)与纳托地尔25 mg每天三次(TID),分别在早上、下午和晚上给药(g T组)对与良性前列腺增生(LUTS/BPH)相关的下尿路症状的疗效和耐受性。并对预测各给药方案疗效的因素进行了分析。方法:研究对象为101例LUTS/BPH患者,随机给予纳托地尔8周,分为O组和t组。纳入标准为国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)大于等于8,IPSS生活质量(IPSS- qol)大于等于3。结果:治疗后8周,两组患者IPSS总分、IPSS- qol和BPH影响指数均较基线有显著改善。治疗后8周,仅O组的空体积、最大流速和平均流速较基线有明显改善。以日本排尿功能障碍临床实践指南治疗效果为标准,两组有效率无显著差异。O组纳哌地尔疗效无独立预测因素,t组前列腺体积和症状严重程度为预测因素,两组不良事件发生率无显著差异。结论:naftopidil 75mg /d给药与75mg /d给药的总体疗效大致相等,但OD治疗客观上更有效。前列腺体积较大的LUTS/BPH患者应给予OD治疗,因为治疗不受主观症状严重程度或前列腺体积的影响。世界卫生杂志,2014;3(2):72-82 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu169e
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Randomized Study Comparing Once-Daily and Thrice-Daily Naftopidil 75 mg/Day for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Background: The efficacy and tolerability of naftopidil 75 mg administered once daily (OD) in the evening (g roup O) were compared to those of naftopidil 25 mg thrice daily (TID), given in the morning, afternoon and evening (g roup T), for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). The factors predicting the efficacy of each dosage regimen were also examined. Methods: The participants were 101 patients with LUTS/BPH who were randomly administered naftopidil for 8 weeks in either group O or group T. Inclusion criteria were international prostate symptom score (IPSS) greater than or equal to 8 and IPSS quality of life (IPSS-QoL) greater than or equal to 3. Results: IPSS total score, IPSS-QoL and the BPH impact index were all significantly improved compared to baseline for both groups at 8 weeks after treatment. Voided volume, maximum flow rate and average flow rate were significantly improved compared to baseline only for group O at 8 weeks after treatment. The effectiveness rate based on the criteria for treatment efficacy of the Japanese clinical practice guideline for voiding dysfunction was not significantly different between the two groups. There was no independent predictive factor for the efficacy of naftopidil in group O, but prostate volume and symptom severity were identified as predictive factors in group T. The rate of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The overall efficacy of naftopidil 75 mg/day given OD was approximately equal to that of 75 mg/day TID, but OD therapy was objectively more effective. LUTS/BPH patients with large prostate volume should be given OD therapy because the therapy is not affected by the severity of subjective symptoms or prostate volume. World J Nephrol Urol. 2014;3(2):72-82 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu169e
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serum Cystatin C as an Index of Early Detection of Acute Kidney Injury in Children With Severe Malaria Clinical Utiliy of Routine Postoperative Laboratory Tests After Laparoscopic Prostate Surgery Do Levels of SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike Antibody Titers After Vaccination Predict Future Infections in Hemodialysis Patients? Albumin Loss in Post-Dilution On-Line Hemodiafiltration Compared With Pre-Dilution On-Line Hemodiafiltration and Conventional Hemodialysis Greens Mean Go: A Case Report Exploring a Vegetarian Diet in Chronic Kidney Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1