上尿路上皮癌的当代管理和治疗趋势

J. Abbott, Arman Cicic, A. Dimatteo, E. Fazio, J. Davalos
{"title":"上尿路上皮癌的当代管理和治疗趋势","authors":"J. Abbott, Arman Cicic, A. Dimatteo, E. Fazio, J. Davalos","doi":"10.14740/WJNU200W","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents only 5% of all urothelial cancers. The 5-year cancer-specific survival in the United States is roughly 75%, with grade and stage being the most powerful predictors of survival. Nephroureterectomy with excision of the ipsilateral ureteral orifice and bladder cuff en bloc remains the gold standard treatment of the upper urinary tract urothelial cancers. However, endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches are rapidly evolving as reasonable alternatives of care depending on grade and stage of disease. A critical review of the current literature and various guidelines regarding tumor management in UTUC was undertaken, with a focus on surgical options. Topics reviewed include percutaneous and endoscopic approaches, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU), options regarding the management of the distal ureter, the role of lymphadenectomy, and the emerging role of chemotherapy in the treatment of UTUC. Both National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) current guidelines are reviewed. Limited recommendations are provided by the American Urological Association (AUA). Scant level 1 or grade A evidence was noted in the establishment of the various guidelines. There is debate regarding how to best manage UTUC. With the current trend towards minimally invasive, localized, and precise surgical treatments for all solid malignancies, we must evaluate this movement as it applies to UTUC. Nephron sparing surgery is the preferred option, when feasible, in the management of other renal malignancies. This, too, must be considered when managing UTUC. Higher quality research is needed to better establish evidence-based guidelines. However, this is a challenging prospect given the low incidence of UTUC and the difficulties encountered in creating appropriate protocols. World J Nephrol Urol. 2015;4(2):189-200 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu200w","PeriodicalId":91634,"journal":{"name":"World journal of nephrology and urology","volume":"4 1","pages":"189-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary Management and Trends in the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"J. Abbott, Arman Cicic, A. Dimatteo, E. Fazio, J. Davalos\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/WJNU200W\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents only 5% of all urothelial cancers. The 5-year cancer-specific survival in the United States is roughly 75%, with grade and stage being the most powerful predictors of survival. Nephroureterectomy with excision of the ipsilateral ureteral orifice and bladder cuff en bloc remains the gold standard treatment of the upper urinary tract urothelial cancers. However, endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches are rapidly evolving as reasonable alternatives of care depending on grade and stage of disease. A critical review of the current literature and various guidelines regarding tumor management in UTUC was undertaken, with a focus on surgical options. Topics reviewed include percutaneous and endoscopic approaches, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU), options regarding the management of the distal ureter, the role of lymphadenectomy, and the emerging role of chemotherapy in the treatment of UTUC. Both National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) current guidelines are reviewed. Limited recommendations are provided by the American Urological Association (AUA). Scant level 1 or grade A evidence was noted in the establishment of the various guidelines. There is debate regarding how to best manage UTUC. With the current trend towards minimally invasive, localized, and precise surgical treatments for all solid malignancies, we must evaluate this movement as it applies to UTUC. Nephron sparing surgery is the preferred option, when feasible, in the management of other renal malignancies. This, too, must be considered when managing UTUC. Higher quality research is needed to better establish evidence-based guidelines. However, this is a challenging prospect given the low incidence of UTUC and the difficulties encountered in creating appropriate protocols. World J Nephrol Urol. 2015;4(2):189-200 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu200w\",\"PeriodicalId\":91634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of nephrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"189-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of nephrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/WJNU200W\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of nephrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/WJNU200W","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

上路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)仅占所有尿路上皮癌的5%。在美国,5年癌症特异性生存率约为75%,分级和分期是最有效的生存率预测指标。肾输尿管切除术加同侧输尿管口和膀胱袖整体切除仍然是治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的金标准。然而,内窥镜和腹腔镜方法正在迅速发展,根据疾病的等级和阶段作为合理的替代治疗。对当前文献和各种关于UTUC肿瘤管理的指南进行了批判性回顾,重点是手术选择。回顾的主题包括经皮和内窥镜入路,腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术(LNU),关于远端输尿管管理的选择,淋巴结切除术的作用,以及化疗在UTUC治疗中的新作用。国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)和欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)目前的指南进行了审查。美国泌尿学协会(AUA)提供了有限的建议。在制定各种指南时,缺乏一级或一级证据。关于如何最好地管理UTUC存在争议。随着目前对所有实体恶性肿瘤进行微创、局部和精确手术治疗的趋势,我们必须评估这一趋势,因为它适用于UTUC。在可行的情况下,保留肾元的手术是治疗其他肾恶性肿瘤的首选方法。在管理UTUC时也必须考虑到这一点。需要更高质量的研究来更好地建立循证指南。然而,考虑到UTUC的低发病率和在制定适当的协议方面遇到的困难,这是一个具有挑战性的前景。世界植物学报,2015;4(2):189-200 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu200w
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contemporary Management and Trends in the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents only 5% of all urothelial cancers. The 5-year cancer-specific survival in the United States is roughly 75%, with grade and stage being the most powerful predictors of survival. Nephroureterectomy with excision of the ipsilateral ureteral orifice and bladder cuff en bloc remains the gold standard treatment of the upper urinary tract urothelial cancers. However, endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches are rapidly evolving as reasonable alternatives of care depending on grade and stage of disease. A critical review of the current literature and various guidelines regarding tumor management in UTUC was undertaken, with a focus on surgical options. Topics reviewed include percutaneous and endoscopic approaches, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU), options regarding the management of the distal ureter, the role of lymphadenectomy, and the emerging role of chemotherapy in the treatment of UTUC. Both National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) current guidelines are reviewed. Limited recommendations are provided by the American Urological Association (AUA). Scant level 1 or grade A evidence was noted in the establishment of the various guidelines. There is debate regarding how to best manage UTUC. With the current trend towards minimally invasive, localized, and precise surgical treatments for all solid malignancies, we must evaluate this movement as it applies to UTUC. Nephron sparing surgery is the preferred option, when feasible, in the management of other renal malignancies. This, too, must be considered when managing UTUC. Higher quality research is needed to better establish evidence-based guidelines. However, this is a challenging prospect given the low incidence of UTUC and the difficulties encountered in creating appropriate protocols. World J Nephrol Urol. 2015;4(2):189-200 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu200w
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serum Cystatin C as an Index of Early Detection of Acute Kidney Injury in Children With Severe Malaria Clinical Utiliy of Routine Postoperative Laboratory Tests After Laparoscopic Prostate Surgery Do Levels of SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Spike Antibody Titers After Vaccination Predict Future Infections in Hemodialysis Patients? Albumin Loss in Post-Dilution On-Line Hemodiafiltration Compared With Pre-Dilution On-Line Hemodiafiltration and Conventional Hemodialysis Greens Mean Go: A Case Report Exploring a Vegetarian Diet in Chronic Kidney Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1