阿根廷中部山脉的野生可食植物。比较分区,了解当地植物学知识的复杂性

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Rodriguesia Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2175-78602022730089
Valentina Saur Palmieri, M. L. López, C. Trillo
{"title":"阿根廷中部山脉的野生可食植物。比较分区,了解当地植物学知识的复杂性","authors":"Valentina Saur Palmieri, M. L. López, C. Trillo","doi":"10.1590/2175-78602022730089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This work evaluates similarities and differences in the processing and consumption of wild flora in three subregions of Central Argentina. It aims to both deepen the knowledge of present local food culture and to contribute to the interpretation of the archaeobotanical data previously generated in the area. Open and semi-structured interviews were conducted in each subregion and the cultural importance index was calculated for each mentioned plant. A total of 45 species and 24 practices were listed and, while 42% of the taxa were common to the subregions, 33% of the species ( e.g., Ximenia americana in the north) and 25% of the practices ( e.g., “milanesa” in the west) were mentioned exclusively in one of them. These particularities were attributed to both ecological ( i.e. plant availability) and socio-cultural factors ( i.e. presence of neo-rural settlers). Our results enhanced our understanding of the local botanical knowledge of the entire mountain area, increasing the understanding of the region as a biocultural system and contributing to the conservation of the area. Moreover, the comparison between the taxa mentioned in the present and those listed in previous archaeobotanical studies in the area, showed that 78% of the wild taxa recovered from archaeological sites are mentioned in the present ( e.g., Lithraea molleoides). Consequently, the present results about food processing are a basis for future studies of the human-plant relationship in the central mountains of Argentina over time.","PeriodicalId":38672,"journal":{"name":"Rodriguesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wild edible plants of the Central Mountains in Argentina. Comparing subregions to understand the complexity of local botanical knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Valentina Saur Palmieri, M. L. López, C. Trillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2175-78602022730089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This work evaluates similarities and differences in the processing and consumption of wild flora in three subregions of Central Argentina. It aims to both deepen the knowledge of present local food culture and to contribute to the interpretation of the archaeobotanical data previously generated in the area. Open and semi-structured interviews were conducted in each subregion and the cultural importance index was calculated for each mentioned plant. A total of 45 species and 24 practices were listed and, while 42% of the taxa were common to the subregions, 33% of the species ( e.g., Ximenia americana in the north) and 25% of the practices ( e.g., “milanesa” in the west) were mentioned exclusively in one of them. These particularities were attributed to both ecological ( i.e. plant availability) and socio-cultural factors ( i.e. presence of neo-rural settlers). Our results enhanced our understanding of the local botanical knowledge of the entire mountain area, increasing the understanding of the region as a biocultural system and contributing to the conservation of the area. Moreover, the comparison between the taxa mentioned in the present and those listed in previous archaeobotanical studies in the area, showed that 78% of the wild taxa recovered from archaeological sites are mentioned in the present ( e.g., Lithraea molleoides). Consequently, the present results about food processing are a basis for future studies of the human-plant relationship in the central mountains of Argentina over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rodriguesia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rodriguesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-78602022730089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rodriguesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-78602022730089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究评估了阿根廷中部三个分区域野生植物加工和消费的异同。它旨在加深对当前当地饮食文化的了解,并有助于解释该地区以前产生的考古植物学数据。在每个次区域进行了开放式和半结构化访谈,并计算了每种提到的植物的文化重要性指数。共有45种和24种惯常做法,其中42%的分类群为亚区共有,33%的种(如北部的Ximenia americana)和25%的惯常做法(如西部的milanesa)仅在一个亚区中被提及。这些特点归因于生态因素(即植物供应)和社会文化因素(即新农村定居者的存在)。我们的研究结果增强了我们对整个山区当地植物知识的了解,增加了对该地区作为一个生物文化系统的理解,并有助于该地区的保护。此外,本文所提到的分类群与该地区以往考古植物学研究中所列出的分类群进行了比较,结果表明,从考古遗址中恢复的野生分类群中有78%在本文中被提及(如Lithraea molleoides)。因此,目前关于食品加工的结果是未来研究阿根廷中部山区人类与植物关系的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wild edible plants of the Central Mountains in Argentina. Comparing subregions to understand the complexity of local botanical knowledge
Abstract This work evaluates similarities and differences in the processing and consumption of wild flora in three subregions of Central Argentina. It aims to both deepen the knowledge of present local food culture and to contribute to the interpretation of the archaeobotanical data previously generated in the area. Open and semi-structured interviews were conducted in each subregion and the cultural importance index was calculated for each mentioned plant. A total of 45 species and 24 practices were listed and, while 42% of the taxa were common to the subregions, 33% of the species ( e.g., Ximenia americana in the north) and 25% of the practices ( e.g., “milanesa” in the west) were mentioned exclusively in one of them. These particularities were attributed to both ecological ( i.e. plant availability) and socio-cultural factors ( i.e. presence of neo-rural settlers). Our results enhanced our understanding of the local botanical knowledge of the entire mountain area, increasing the understanding of the region as a biocultural system and contributing to the conservation of the area. Moreover, the comparison between the taxa mentioned in the present and those listed in previous archaeobotanical studies in the area, showed that 78% of the wild taxa recovered from archaeological sites are mentioned in the present ( e.g., Lithraea molleoides). Consequently, the present results about food processing are a basis for future studies of the human-plant relationship in the central mountains of Argentina over time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rodriguesia
Rodriguesia Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Flora of Ceará state, Brazil: Evolvulus (Cresseae, Convolvulaceae) Flora of Espírito Santo: Celastroideae (Celastraceae) Propagation of two epiphytic Cactaceae for relocation to an urban protected area of the Atlantic Forest in São Paulo, Brazil Physiological and anatomical responses of Eugenia dysenterica to glyphosate Denticula, Hantzschia and Tryblionella (Bacillariaceae, Bacillariophyta) from northwestern Ceará freshwaters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1