{"title":"后现代主义、马克思主义和现代性中的贫乏科学","authors":"Eduardo Lopes Cabral Maia","doi":"10.15210/PP.V0I13.3187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the discussions about modernity, rationality and science, this article intends to broach the debate, within the field of Social Sciences, among postmodernists and Marxists about the validity of modern science and the criterion to determinate, or not, a new historical stage. To situate this debate, we sought an analysis of the Michel Meffesoli’s postmodern thought and the Marxist critique of Ellen Wood Meiksins. As a result, this article intends to clarify key points of the theoretical debate and present a critical analysis about the validity, and the problems, of Marxist and post-modern’s approaches.","PeriodicalId":30291,"journal":{"name":"Pensamento Plural","volume":"1 1","pages":"7-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pós-Modernos, marxistas e a pobre ciência na modernidade\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Lopes Cabral Maia\",\"doi\":\"10.15210/PP.V0I13.3187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the discussions about modernity, rationality and science, this article intends to broach the debate, within the field of Social Sciences, among postmodernists and Marxists about the validity of modern science and the criterion to determinate, or not, a new historical stage. To situate this debate, we sought an analysis of the Michel Meffesoli’s postmodern thought and the Marxist critique of Ellen Wood Meiksins. As a result, this article intends to clarify key points of the theoretical debate and present a critical analysis about the validity, and the problems, of Marxist and post-modern’s approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pensamento Plural\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"7-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pensamento Plural\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15210/PP.V0I13.3187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensamento Plural","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15210/PP.V0I13.3187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pós-Modernos, marxistas e a pobre ciência na modernidade
Based on the discussions about modernity, rationality and science, this article intends to broach the debate, within the field of Social Sciences, among postmodernists and Marxists about the validity of modern science and the criterion to determinate, or not, a new historical stage. To situate this debate, we sought an analysis of the Michel Meffesoli’s postmodern thought and the Marxist critique of Ellen Wood Meiksins. As a result, this article intends to clarify key points of the theoretical debate and present a critical analysis about the validity, and the problems, of Marxist and post-modern’s approaches.