{"title":"《双面神:民粹主义与政治制度的复杂关系》","authors":"Gerardo Aboy Carlés","doi":"10.15210/PP.V0I7.3642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work explores the form in which the complex relation between populism and institutions has been approached by political studies. The mainstream of Political Science has considered populist experiences as a threat for institutions, particularly for poliarchich ones. On the other hand, authors who defend populism see the institutions as a danger for the former social innovation capacity. Our perspective, different from the two previous, identifies analytic issues sustained in the coexistence of populism and institutions in some historical experiences.","PeriodicalId":30291,"journal":{"name":"Pensamento Plural","volume":"1 1","pages":"21-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Las dos caras de Jano: acerca de la compleja relación entre populismo e instituciones políticas\",\"authors\":\"Gerardo Aboy Carlés\",\"doi\":\"10.15210/PP.V0I7.3642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present work explores the form in which the complex relation between populism and institutions has been approached by political studies. The mainstream of Political Science has considered populist experiences as a threat for institutions, particularly for poliarchich ones. On the other hand, authors who defend populism see the institutions as a danger for the former social innovation capacity. Our perspective, different from the two previous, identifies analytic issues sustained in the coexistence of populism and institutions in some historical experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pensamento Plural\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"21-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pensamento Plural\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15210/PP.V0I7.3642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensamento Plural","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15210/PP.V0I7.3642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Las dos caras de Jano: acerca de la compleja relación entre populismo e instituciones políticas
The present work explores the form in which the complex relation between populism and institutions has been approached by political studies. The mainstream of Political Science has considered populist experiences as a threat for institutions, particularly for poliarchich ones. On the other hand, authors who defend populism see the institutions as a danger for the former social innovation capacity. Our perspective, different from the two previous, identifies analytic issues sustained in the coexistence of populism and institutions in some historical experiences.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
