按科学领域、专业和开放获取法规划分的开放获取期刊的可用性

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Transinformacao Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2318-0889202234e210064
Jorge Mañana Rodríguez, Raf Guns
{"title":"按科学领域、专业和开放获取法规划分的开放获取期刊的可用性","authors":"Jorge Mañana Rodríguez, Raf Guns","doi":"10.1590/2318-0889202234e210064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The availability of Open Access journals in the various fields of knowledge in Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science is hypothesized to present strong inequalities, thus affecting the choice of journals by researchers wishing to publish their research results in Open Access. The first objective of this research was to contrast this hypothesis, by crossing the list of journals available at WoS with the lists of the Directory of Open Access Journals. The availability of OA journals presents strong inequalities, ranging from 5 to 40% depending on the field of knowledge. At the level of universities, such disparity in the availability of Open Access journals is an important factor regarding their accomplishment of Open Access mandates considering their specialization profiles. In this work, as the second objective, the publications available on the Web of Science (from 2016 to 2020) of the universities belonging to the YERUN Network (Young European Research Universities) are studied in order to identify their specialization profiles, their Open Access types (and evolution) and the possible interactions between their specialization and the availability of Open Access journals and their respective fields of specialization. A general overview of the volumes of funded research and the different proportions of Open Access and non-Open Access in funded and non-funded research is also provided. The indicator “Open Access Likelihood” is introduced and applied as a proxy for the likelihood of Open Access publications taking into account the fields of specialization of the YERUN universities. The results of its application underline the need to take into consideration both, specialization and Open Access availability when designing feasible Open Access mandates. Future research includes the study of the availability of Open Access journals by tiers of impact actors.","PeriodicalId":44216,"journal":{"name":"Transinformacao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Availability of Open Access journals by scientific fields, specialization and Open Access regulations in the YERUN universities\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Mañana Rodríguez, Raf Guns\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2318-0889202234e210064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The availability of Open Access journals in the various fields of knowledge in Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science is hypothesized to present strong inequalities, thus affecting the choice of journals by researchers wishing to publish their research results in Open Access. The first objective of this research was to contrast this hypothesis, by crossing the list of journals available at WoS with the lists of the Directory of Open Access Journals. The availability of OA journals presents strong inequalities, ranging from 5 to 40% depending on the field of knowledge. At the level of universities, such disparity in the availability of Open Access journals is an important factor regarding their accomplishment of Open Access mandates considering their specialization profiles. In this work, as the second objective, the publications available on the Web of Science (from 2016 to 2020) of the universities belonging to the YERUN Network (Young European Research Universities) are studied in order to identify their specialization profiles, their Open Access types (and evolution) and the possible interactions between their specialization and the availability of Open Access journals and their respective fields of specialization. A general overview of the volumes of funded research and the different proportions of Open Access and non-Open Access in funded and non-funded research is also provided. The indicator “Open Access Likelihood” is introduced and applied as a proxy for the likelihood of Open Access publications taking into account the fields of specialization of the YERUN universities. The results of its application underline the need to take into consideration both, specialization and Open Access availability when designing feasible Open Access mandates. Future research includes the study of the availability of Open Access journals by tiers of impact actors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transinformacao\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transinformacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202234e210064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transinformacao","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202234e210064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在Clarivate Analytics的Web of Science中,不同知识领域的开放获取期刊的可获得性被假设为存在强烈的不平等,从而影响了希望在开放获取中发表研究成果的研究人员对期刊的选择。本研究的第一个目的是对比这一假设,通过交叉WoS可获得的期刊列表与开放获取期刊目录列表。开放获取期刊的可获得性表现出强烈的不平等,根据知识领域的不同,从5%到40%不等。在大学的层面上,考虑到他们的专业概况,开放获取期刊的可用性的这种差异是影响他们完成开放获取任务的一个重要因素。在这项工作中,作为第二个目标,研究了属于YERUN网络(年轻的欧洲研究型大学)的大学在科学网上可用的出版物(从2016年到2020年),以确定他们的专业概况,他们的开放获取类型(和演变)以及他们的专业与开放获取期刊的可用性及其各自专业领域之间可能的相互作用。本文还提供了受资助研究的总体概况,以及开放获取和非开放获取在受资助和非资助研究中的不同比例。“开放获取可能性”指标被引入并应用,作为考虑到YERUN大学专业领域的开放获取出版物可能性的代理。其应用结果强调,在设计可行的开放获取授权时,需要同时考虑专业化和开放获取的可用性。未来的研究包括研究开放获取期刊的可获得性的影响行为者的层次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Availability of Open Access journals by scientific fields, specialization and Open Access regulations in the YERUN universities
Abstract The availability of Open Access journals in the various fields of knowledge in Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science is hypothesized to present strong inequalities, thus affecting the choice of journals by researchers wishing to publish their research results in Open Access. The first objective of this research was to contrast this hypothesis, by crossing the list of journals available at WoS with the lists of the Directory of Open Access Journals. The availability of OA journals presents strong inequalities, ranging from 5 to 40% depending on the field of knowledge. At the level of universities, such disparity in the availability of Open Access journals is an important factor regarding their accomplishment of Open Access mandates considering their specialization profiles. In this work, as the second objective, the publications available on the Web of Science (from 2016 to 2020) of the universities belonging to the YERUN Network (Young European Research Universities) are studied in order to identify their specialization profiles, their Open Access types (and evolution) and the possible interactions between their specialization and the availability of Open Access journals and their respective fields of specialization. A general overview of the volumes of funded research and the different proportions of Open Access and non-Open Access in funded and non-funded research is also provided. The indicator “Open Access Likelihood” is introduced and applied as a proxy for the likelihood of Open Access publications taking into account the fields of specialization of the YERUN universities. The results of its application underline the need to take into consideration both, specialization and Open Access availability when designing feasible Open Access mandates. Future research includes the study of the availability of Open Access journals by tiers of impact actors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transinformacao
Transinformacao INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Transinformação es una revista cuatrimestral especializada, abierta a las contribuciones de la comunidad científica nacional e internacional y editada por la Facultad de Biblioteconomía y el Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales Aplicadas de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Campinas. Fundada en 1989, está clasificada en la lista Qualis como A1 y publica artículos que contribuyen al estudio y el desarrollo científico de las Ciencias de la Información, la Biblioteconomía, la Archivología, la Museología y sus áreas afines.
期刊最新文献
Arquitetura da Informação Multimodal: contribuições no desenvolvimento de Inteligência Artificial A formação do bibliotecário jurídico no Brasil: uma análise das disciplinas sobre informação jurídica das universidades federais brasileiras Digital Humanities and the Sustainable Development Goals: a reflection for Information Science The Friendship Paradox in the formation of academic committees Análisis de los sitios webs de las catedrales de Europa: estructura, contenidos y estrategias comunicativas en la era pandémica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1