Luís Fernando Nogueira Tofani, Lumena Almeida Castro Furtado, Rosemarie Andreazza, André Luiz Bigal, Deize Graziele Conceição Ferreira Feliciano, Gabriela Rodrigues da Silva, Arthur Chioro
{"title":"巴西的紧急和紧急护理网络:综合审查","authors":"Luís Fernando Nogueira Tofani, Lumena Almeida Castro Furtado, Rosemarie Andreazza, André Luiz Bigal, Deize Graziele Conceição Ferreira Feliciano, Gabriela Rodrigues da Silva, Arthur Chioro","doi":"10.1590/s0104-12902023220122en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Urgent and Emergency Care Network (RUE) was proposed in Brazil as a public policy to articulate and integrate the health services of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS), expanding and qualifying the access of users in e emergency health situations in an efficient and timely manner. This study analyzes the scientific production on the RUE in Brazil and elaborates summaries showing the limits and challenges of this health policy. An integrative literature review was used as a method, based on the search for articles in the LILACS, SciELO, and MEDLINE databases and for dissertations and theses on the virtual platform of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The investigation enabled the analysis of 34 studies in the field of collective health, focused on the different emergency services and the integration between them, including possible changes in the health care process and different evaluation strategies, by using different approaches, mainly qualitative. Weaknesses are observed in the network articulation, maintaining the centrality of hospital services and the power of its symbolic capital, with primary care being relegated to the discursive field.","PeriodicalId":46918,"journal":{"name":"Saude E Sociedade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urgent and emergency care networks in Brazil: an integrative review\",\"authors\":\"Luís Fernando Nogueira Tofani, Lumena Almeida Castro Furtado, Rosemarie Andreazza, André Luiz Bigal, Deize Graziele Conceição Ferreira Feliciano, Gabriela Rodrigues da Silva, Arthur Chioro\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0104-12902023220122en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Urgent and Emergency Care Network (RUE) was proposed in Brazil as a public policy to articulate and integrate the health services of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS), expanding and qualifying the access of users in e emergency health situations in an efficient and timely manner. This study analyzes the scientific production on the RUE in Brazil and elaborates summaries showing the limits and challenges of this health policy. An integrative literature review was used as a method, based on the search for articles in the LILACS, SciELO, and MEDLINE databases and for dissertations and theses on the virtual platform of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The investigation enabled the analysis of 34 studies in the field of collective health, focused on the different emergency services and the integration between them, including possible changes in the health care process and different evaluation strategies, by using different approaches, mainly qualitative. Weaknesses are observed in the network articulation, maintaining the centrality of hospital services and the power of its symbolic capital, with primary care being relegated to the discursive field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saude E Sociedade\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saude E Sociedade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902023220122en\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude E Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902023220122en","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
紧急和紧急护理网络(RUE)是在巴西提出的一项公共政策,以阐明和整合巴西国家卫生系统(SUS)的卫生服务,扩大和资格的用户访问在紧急卫生情况下,有效和及时的方式。本研究分析了巴西关于RUE的科学成果,并阐述了显示这一卫生政策的局限性和挑战的摘要。通过检索LILACS、SciELO和MEDLINE数据库中的文章和Nível Superior (CAPES)虚拟平台上的论文和论文,采用综合文献综述的方法。通过调查,能够对集体卫生领域的34项研究进行分析,重点是不同的紧急服务及其之间的整合,包括保健过程可能发生的变化和不同的评价战略,采用不同的方法,主要是定性方法。在网络衔接中观察到弱点,维持医院服务的中心地位及其象征性资本的力量,初级保健被降级到话语领域。
Urgent and emergency care networks in Brazil: an integrative review
Abstract The Urgent and Emergency Care Network (RUE) was proposed in Brazil as a public policy to articulate and integrate the health services of the Brazilian National Health System (SUS), expanding and qualifying the access of users in e emergency health situations in an efficient and timely manner. This study analyzes the scientific production on the RUE in Brazil and elaborates summaries showing the limits and challenges of this health policy. An integrative literature review was used as a method, based on the search for articles in the LILACS, SciELO, and MEDLINE databases and for dissertations and theses on the virtual platform of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The investigation enabled the analysis of 34 studies in the field of collective health, focused on the different emergency services and the integration between them, including possible changes in the health care process and different evaluation strategies, by using different approaches, mainly qualitative. Weaknesses are observed in the network articulation, maintaining the centrality of hospital services and the power of its symbolic capital, with primary care being relegated to the discursive field.