在改善巴西统一卫生系统初级保健的获取和质量的国家方案中结束了政府-学术界的合作

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Saude E Sociedade Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1590/s0104-12902023210831pt
Pauline Cavalcanti, M. Fernandez, Garibaldi Dantas Gurgel Júnior
{"title":"在改善巴西统一卫生系统初级保健的获取和质量的国家方案中结束了政府-学术界的合作","authors":"Pauline Cavalcanti, M. Fernandez, Garibaldi Dantas Gurgel Júnior","doi":"10.1590/s0104-12902023210831pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study analyzes the dissolution of the institutional cooperation, lasting approximately a decade, between the Ministry of Health and a set of academic institutions for the implementation of the National Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care (PMAQ-AB) in the scope of the Brazilian Nacional Health System (SUS). This exploratory, qualitative research consists of a case study that uses assumptions of Historical Neoinstitutionalism to guide the analysis. Data were collected by documentary and bibliographic research and semi-structured interviews with key actors. From the content analysis, three analytical categories were evidenced: end of the PMAQ-AB - historical process, political-institutional context and actors; end of the institutional cooperation - government-academy interaction process; and actors’ perceptions about the end of institutional cooperation. The end of institutional cooperation happened in a context of change of government at the federal level, within a new political-institutional order of SUS and was influenced by historical factors and the practices of public managers and in the conduct of political processes. An inter-institutional government-academy exchange with a view to strengthening health management and supporting the institutional development of the SUS is a future expectation, considering the adversities imposed on the field of health and public education in Brazil today.","PeriodicalId":46918,"journal":{"name":"Saude E Sociedade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O fim da cooperação governo-academia no Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica do Sistema Único de Saúde\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Cavalcanti, M. Fernandez, Garibaldi Dantas Gurgel Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0104-12902023210831pt\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study analyzes the dissolution of the institutional cooperation, lasting approximately a decade, between the Ministry of Health and a set of academic institutions for the implementation of the National Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care (PMAQ-AB) in the scope of the Brazilian Nacional Health System (SUS). This exploratory, qualitative research consists of a case study that uses assumptions of Historical Neoinstitutionalism to guide the analysis. Data were collected by documentary and bibliographic research and semi-structured interviews with key actors. From the content analysis, three analytical categories were evidenced: end of the PMAQ-AB - historical process, political-institutional context and actors; end of the institutional cooperation - government-academy interaction process; and actors’ perceptions about the end of institutional cooperation. The end of institutional cooperation happened in a context of change of government at the federal level, within a new political-institutional order of SUS and was influenced by historical factors and the practices of public managers and in the conduct of political processes. An inter-institutional government-academy exchange with a view to strengthening health management and supporting the institutional development of the SUS is a future expectation, considering the adversities imposed on the field of health and public education in Brazil today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saude E Sociedade\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saude E Sociedade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902023210831pt\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude E Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902023210831pt","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

总结本研究分析了机构的合作格局,持续时间大约十年,卫生部和国家一系列的学术机构的规划实现的改进的访问和基本质量的关注(PMAQ ab)在医疗保健系统(SUS)。这一探索性和定性研究包括一个案例研究,使用历史新制度主义的假设来指导分析。数据是通过文献研究、文献和对关键人物的半结构化访谈收集的。从内容分析中可以看出三个分析范畴:PMAQ- ab的终结——历史进程、政治制度背景和行动者;机构合作的终结——政府与学术界的互动过程;以及行动者对机构合作结束的看法。机构合作的结束发生在联邦一级政府更迭的背景下,在单一卫生系统新的政治-机构秩序内,并受到历史因素和公共管理人员在进行政治进程方面的做法的影响。考虑到目前巴西卫生和公共教育领域所面临的困难,政府-学术界之间的机构间交流旨在加强卫生管理和支持单一卫生系统的机构发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O fim da cooperação governo-academia no Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica do Sistema Único de Saúde
Abstract This study analyzes the dissolution of the institutional cooperation, lasting approximately a decade, between the Ministry of Health and a set of academic institutions for the implementation of the National Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care (PMAQ-AB) in the scope of the Brazilian Nacional Health System (SUS). This exploratory, qualitative research consists of a case study that uses assumptions of Historical Neoinstitutionalism to guide the analysis. Data were collected by documentary and bibliographic research and semi-structured interviews with key actors. From the content analysis, three analytical categories were evidenced: end of the PMAQ-AB - historical process, political-institutional context and actors; end of the institutional cooperation - government-academy interaction process; and actors’ perceptions about the end of institutional cooperation. The end of institutional cooperation happened in a context of change of government at the federal level, within a new political-institutional order of SUS and was influenced by historical factors and the practices of public managers and in the conduct of political processes. An inter-institutional government-academy exchange with a view to strengthening health management and supporting the institutional development of the SUS is a future expectation, considering the adversities imposed on the field of health and public education in Brazil today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saude E Sociedade
Saude E Sociedade PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Plataformas digitais de entrega de alimentação: condições de trabalho e riscos para a saúde A insegurança das barragens da Vale em Minas Gerais, Brasil: aplicação da teoria da atividade à análise de desastres Mulheres com dor lombar crônica em um assentamento rural: desafios de um olhar contextualizado a partir de uma formação em Fisioterapia Vulnerabilidades e imigração boliviana na cidade de São Paulo, Brasil: entre políticas públicas de saúde, mortes e resistências coletivas Estudo sobre o acolhimento de crianças e adolescentes em instituições para pessoas com deficiência
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1