技术变革的成本效益分析:巴西库里蒂巴都市地区固体废物管理财团的案例

IF 0.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 WATER RESOURCES Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1590/s1413-415220230002
Tarso José Túlio, A. P. Schmitz
{"title":"技术变革的成本效益分析:巴西库里蒂巴都市地区固体废物管理财团的案例","authors":"Tarso José Túlio, A. P. Schmitz","doi":"10.1590/s1413-415220230002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Huge increases in the volume of waste produced by society have created an urgent need for new and improved municipal solid waste (MSW) processes. In many countries, traditional methods to manage MSW, such as landfills, have been abandoned in favor of more effective and environmentally efficient technologies. These include gasification (decomposition at high temperatures), recycling, and composting (of organic matter). The purpose of this research was to assess certain financial, social, and environmental indicators, especially the IRR and cost-benefit ratio of changing the technologies used in MSW processing. The research focuses on assessing these changes in the CONRESOL area — a consortium that covers almost all the municipalities in the metropolitan region of Curitiba, Brazil. To this end, scenarios were proposed that apply various technological combinations and two collection fees. Of the three proposed scenarios, the one with the best socioeconomic and environmental results (Internal Rate of Return, Net Present Value, Discounted Payback, and Benefit/Cost ratio) combines gasification, recycling, and composting. This scenario generated the least GHG emissions and the highest number of jobs.","PeriodicalId":11619,"journal":{"name":"Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-benefit analysis of technological changes: case of a management solid waste consortia in the metropolitan region of Curitiba, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Tarso José Túlio, A. P. Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1413-415220230002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Huge increases in the volume of waste produced by society have created an urgent need for new and improved municipal solid waste (MSW) processes. In many countries, traditional methods to manage MSW, such as landfills, have been abandoned in favor of more effective and environmentally efficient technologies. These include gasification (decomposition at high temperatures), recycling, and composting (of organic matter). The purpose of this research was to assess certain financial, social, and environmental indicators, especially the IRR and cost-benefit ratio of changing the technologies used in MSW processing. The research focuses on assessing these changes in the CONRESOL area — a consortium that covers almost all the municipalities in the metropolitan region of Curitiba, Brazil. To this end, scenarios were proposed that apply various technological combinations and two collection fees. Of the three proposed scenarios, the one with the best socioeconomic and environmental results (Internal Rate of Return, Net Present Value, Discounted Payback, and Benefit/Cost ratio) combines gasification, recycling, and composting. This scenario generated the least GHG emissions and the highest number of jobs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-415220230002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-415220230002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会产生的废物量急剧增加,迫切需要新的和改进的城市固体废物(MSW)处理方法。在许多国家,诸如垃圾填埋等管理都市固体废物的传统方法已被放弃,而采用更有效和更环保的技术。这些包括气化(在高温下分解)、回收和堆肥(有机物)。本研究的目的是评估某些财务、社会和环境指标,特别是改变城市生活垃圾处理技术的内部收益率和成本效益比。研究的重点是评估CONRESOL地区的这些变化,CONRESOL是一个覆盖巴西库里蒂巴大都市区几乎所有城市的联合体。为此,提出了应用各种技术组合和两种收费的方案。在提出的三种方案中,具有最佳社会经济和环境结果(内部回报率、净现值、贴现回报和效益/成本比)的方案结合了气化、回收和堆肥。这种情况产生的温室气体排放量最少,就业机会最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-benefit analysis of technological changes: case of a management solid waste consortia in the metropolitan region of Curitiba, Brazil
ABSTRACT Huge increases in the volume of waste produced by society have created an urgent need for new and improved municipal solid waste (MSW) processes. In many countries, traditional methods to manage MSW, such as landfills, have been abandoned in favor of more effective and environmentally efficient technologies. These include gasification (decomposition at high temperatures), recycling, and composting (of organic matter). The purpose of this research was to assess certain financial, social, and environmental indicators, especially the IRR and cost-benefit ratio of changing the technologies used in MSW processing. The research focuses on assessing these changes in the CONRESOL area — a consortium that covers almost all the municipalities in the metropolitan region of Curitiba, Brazil. To this end, scenarios were proposed that apply various technological combinations and two collection fees. Of the three proposed scenarios, the one with the best socioeconomic and environmental results (Internal Rate of Return, Net Present Value, Discounted Payback, and Benefit/Cost ratio) combines gasification, recycling, and composting. This scenario generated the least GHG emissions and the highest number of jobs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
101
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Treatment and resource utilization for a non-biodegradable organophosphorus wastewater using micro-channel reactor Hydraulic behavior of valves used in building water supply systems Cost-benefit analysis of technological changes: case of a management solid waste consortia in the metropolitan region of Curitiba, Brazil Caracterização física de 14 bacias hidrográficas brasileiras: proposição do indicador da declividade média dos rios e do coeficiente de suscetibilidade de enchentes Proposição e análise de viabilidade econômica de cenários para o gerenciamento de resíduos da construção civil por meio de consórcios intermunicipais
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1