少付钱还是多付钱?定价策略分析

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS AD-minister Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI:10.17230/AD-MINISTER.31.3
José Ignacio Azuela-Flores, Magda Lizet Ochoa-Hernández, Karla Paola Jiménez-Almaguer
{"title":"少付钱还是多付钱?定价策略分析","authors":"José Ignacio Azuela-Flores, Magda Lizet Ochoa-Hernández, Karla Paola Jiménez-Almaguer","doi":"10.17230/AD-MINISTER.31.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Companies are looking for alternatives that allow them to stand out from their competition. One of the alternatives to achieve this is the participatory pricing strategies in which consumers have control over the prices. However, under these types of strategies, suppliers are at risk because consumers might engage themselves in opportunistic behaviors and decide to pay nothing. The aim of this paper was to analyze the effects of social approval (a person’s desire to have others’ positive appraisal) on the individuals’ willingness to pay and the relationship between participatory pricing strategies and the perception of justice. To achieve this, a 49-participant field experiment (mean difference) was conducted. The results did not provide evidence to support the idea that social approval increases the willingness to pay. Instead, it provides evidence of the impact of this strategy on the perception of justice.","PeriodicalId":42371,"journal":{"name":"AD-minister","volume":"1 1","pages":"47-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PAY LESS OR PAY WHAT IS FAIR? ANALYZING PRICING STRATEGIES\",\"authors\":\"José Ignacio Azuela-Flores, Magda Lizet Ochoa-Hernández, Karla Paola Jiménez-Almaguer\",\"doi\":\"10.17230/AD-MINISTER.31.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Companies are looking for alternatives that allow them to stand out from their competition. One of the alternatives to achieve this is the participatory pricing strategies in which consumers have control over the prices. However, under these types of strategies, suppliers are at risk because consumers might engage themselves in opportunistic behaviors and decide to pay nothing. The aim of this paper was to analyze the effects of social approval (a person’s desire to have others’ positive appraisal) on the individuals’ willingness to pay and the relationship between participatory pricing strategies and the perception of justice. To achieve this, a 49-participant field experiment (mean difference) was conducted. The results did not provide evidence to support the idea that social approval increases the willingness to pay. Instead, it provides evidence of the impact of this strategy on the perception of justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AD-minister\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"47-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AD-minister\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17230/AD-MINISTER.31.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AD-minister","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17230/AD-MINISTER.31.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公司正在寻找能让他们在竞争中脱颖而出的替代方案。实现这一目标的替代方案之一是参与式定价策略,即消费者可以控制价格。然而,在这些类型的策略下,供应商面临风险,因为消费者可能会参与机会主义行为,并决定不支付任何费用。本文的目的是分析社会认同(个体希望得到他人的积极评价)对个体支付意愿的影响,以及参与式定价策略与公平感之间的关系。为此,进行了49名参与者的现场试验(均差)。研究结果并没有提供证据来支持社会认可会增加支付意愿的观点。相反,它提供了这种策略对正义感知的影响的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PAY LESS OR PAY WHAT IS FAIR? ANALYZING PRICING STRATEGIES
Companies are looking for alternatives that allow them to stand out from their competition. One of the alternatives to achieve this is the participatory pricing strategies in which consumers have control over the prices. However, under these types of strategies, suppliers are at risk because consumers might engage themselves in opportunistic behaviors and decide to pay nothing. The aim of this paper was to analyze the effects of social approval (a person’s desire to have others’ positive appraisal) on the individuals’ willingness to pay and the relationship between participatory pricing strategies and the perception of justice. To achieve this, a 49-participant field experiment (mean difference) was conducted. The results did not provide evidence to support the idea that social approval increases the willingness to pay. Instead, it provides evidence of the impact of this strategy on the perception of justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AD-minister
AD-minister BUSINESS-
自引率
55.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurial Intentions in the Caribbean: Antecedents and Variations Enterprise and entrepreneurship in peripheral contexts: experiences and prospects from the caribbean small island developing states The Pursuit of Entrepreneurship by Youths in the Caribbean Posibles acciones de actores público-privados hacia un desarrollo regenerativo de negocios, en escenarios futuros Strategic Opportunities Aspect of CSR for Improving Location Advantages in Developed and Emerging Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1