在二十世纪的乌克兰舞台艺术和比喻的声明

T. K. Ognieva
{"title":"在二十世纪的乌克兰舞台艺术和比喻的声明","authors":"T. K. Ognieva","doi":"10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article \"Artistic and figurative statements in the Ukrainian scenography of the XX century\" analyzes the conditions and factors of develop- ment of the art of theater and scenography as a component during the XX century in Ukraine. The scenographic space provides an opportunity to synthesize elements of plastic arts to create an artistic and figurative solution and to form the emotional climate of a theatrical performance. During the development of the art of theater, an evolution of the scenography took place. The level of scenography in Ukraine in the 1920s and 1930s not only corresponded to the standards of the world art, but also exceeded its value orientations, provided the key to understanding artistic searches and discoveries on a global scale. Ukrainian scenographers offered independent artistic and figurative solutions of performances. In the scenography of the 1920s, O. Khvostenko-Khvostov used various means of design of space – construction, painting, fabrics, mobile machine, banner, film projection, light, photomontage, etc. A. Petritskyi even managed to give constructivism diversity and emotionality, perfectly synthesize the spatio-temporal characteristics of theatrical art, forming an artistic and figurative solution of the play. W. Meller's work in the 20s-30s of the XXth century is also an example of artistic figurative stage design of the play and the most fruitful inter- pretation of European innovative trends on the basis of Ukrainian theatrical art. The \"social realism\" style approved by the influenced the develop- ment of Ukrainian culture; in theatrical art and, in particular, scenography, we observe a gradual departure from the artistic and figurative organiza- tion of the stage towards realistic reproduction of the place of action. Thus, the legacy of V. Meller, A. Petritskyi and O. Khvostenko-Khvostov before and after World War II is not distinguished by innovative, ex- traordinary stage solutions, which is explained by objective reasons. D. Borovskyi was one of the first scenographers of the post – war period who demonstrated artistic and figurative interpretation of dramatic material in Ukraine. Myron Kyprian has a special place among the artists of the stage, whose creative work of the 60s – 70s of the XX century abounds in artistic and figurative solutions of performances. We emphasize that the Ukrainian scenography in the 50's – 60's generally corresponded to the basic principles of the style of socialist realism. Most artists of the stage used standard techniques, but there were also artistic and figurative scenographic solutions that stood out from the general usual practice. The process of liberation of art in general and theatrical in particular has shifted and is constantly evolving towards getting rid of the dictates of worldview principles and aesthetic systems that determined the ways of development of art in previous years. The solution of the problems of visu- alization of the artistic and figurative organization of the stage space is the principle of universalism of the stage environment, plastic embodiment of ideas. At the end of the XXth century artists turned to a variety of artistic techniques in an effort to embody the symbolic subtext and philosophi- cal content of the dramatic material by enriching the palette of expressive and technical means. The scenography system combines various ele- ments, visual and plastic characteristics of materials to metaphorize the action. The large-scale, monumental plastic embodiment of the main idea of the artist – scenographer coexists with the empty space of the stage. At the end of the twentieth century we observe the mutual enrichment and spiritual growth of artists – scenographers who form the artistic and figurative solution of the play and the audience, able to perceive and care about the metaphorical symbolic sphere of plastic – spatial coordinates of the play.","PeriodicalId":52653,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ARTISTIC AND FIGURATIVE STATEMENTS IN UKRAINIAN SCENOGRAPHY OF THE XX CENTURY\",\"authors\":\"T. K. Ognieva\",\"doi\":\"10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article \\\"Artistic and figurative statements in the Ukrainian scenography of the XX century\\\" analyzes the conditions and factors of develop- ment of the art of theater and scenography as a component during the XX century in Ukraine. The scenographic space provides an opportunity to synthesize elements of plastic arts to create an artistic and figurative solution and to form the emotional climate of a theatrical performance. During the development of the art of theater, an evolution of the scenography took place. The level of scenography in Ukraine in the 1920s and 1930s not only corresponded to the standards of the world art, but also exceeded its value orientations, provided the key to understanding artistic searches and discoveries on a global scale. Ukrainian scenographers offered independent artistic and figurative solutions of performances. In the scenography of the 1920s, O. Khvostenko-Khvostov used various means of design of space – construction, painting, fabrics, mobile machine, banner, film projection, light, photomontage, etc. A. Petritskyi even managed to give constructivism diversity and emotionality, perfectly synthesize the spatio-temporal characteristics of theatrical art, forming an artistic and figurative solution of the play. W. Meller's work in the 20s-30s of the XXth century is also an example of artistic figurative stage design of the play and the most fruitful inter- pretation of European innovative trends on the basis of Ukrainian theatrical art. The \\\"social realism\\\" style approved by the influenced the develop- ment of Ukrainian culture; in theatrical art and, in particular, scenography, we observe a gradual departure from the artistic and figurative organiza- tion of the stage towards realistic reproduction of the place of action. Thus, the legacy of V. Meller, A. Petritskyi and O. Khvostenko-Khvostov before and after World War II is not distinguished by innovative, ex- traordinary stage solutions, which is explained by objective reasons. D. Borovskyi was one of the first scenographers of the post – war period who demonstrated artistic and figurative interpretation of dramatic material in Ukraine. Myron Kyprian has a special place among the artists of the stage, whose creative work of the 60s – 70s of the XX century abounds in artistic and figurative solutions of performances. We emphasize that the Ukrainian scenography in the 50's – 60's generally corresponded to the basic principles of the style of socialist realism. Most artists of the stage used standard techniques, but there were also artistic and figurative scenographic solutions that stood out from the general usual practice. The process of liberation of art in general and theatrical in particular has shifted and is constantly evolving towards getting rid of the dictates of worldview principles and aesthetic systems that determined the ways of development of art in previous years. The solution of the problems of visu- alization of the artistic and figurative organization of the stage space is the principle of universalism of the stage environment, plastic embodiment of ideas. At the end of the XXth century artists turned to a variety of artistic techniques in an effort to embody the symbolic subtext and philosophi- cal content of the dramatic material by enriching the palette of expressive and technical means. The scenography system combines various ele- ments, visual and plastic characteristics of materials to metaphorize the action. The large-scale, monumental plastic embodiment of the main idea of the artist – scenographer coexists with the empty space of the stage. At the end of the twentieth century we observe the mutual enrichment and spiritual growth of artists – scenographers who form the artistic and figurative solution of the play and the audience, able to perceive and care about the metaphorical symbolic sphere of plastic – spatial coordinates of the play.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''ki kul''turologichni studiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/ucs.2021.2(9).13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章《二十世纪乌克兰舞台剧艺术与具象的表述》分析了二十世纪乌克兰戏剧艺术与舞台剧艺术发展的条件与因素。场景空间提供了一个综合造型艺术元素的机会,创造一个艺术和形象的解决方案,形成戏剧表演的情感氛围。在戏剧艺术的发展过程中,舞台布景也发生了演变。20世纪二三十年代乌克兰的舞台艺术水平不仅符合世界艺术的标准,而且超越了世界艺术的价值取向,为理解全球范围内的艺术寻找和发现提供了关键。乌克兰的舞台设计人员提供了独立的艺术和形象的表演解决方案。在20世纪20年代的舞台设计中,O. Khvostenko-Khvostov使用了各种空间设计手段——建筑、绘画、织物、移动机器、横幅、电影投影、灯光、蒙太奇等。彼得里茨基甚至赋予了建构主义的多样性和情感性,完美地综合了戏剧艺术的时空特征,形成了戏剧的艺术化和具象化的解决方案。W. Meller在20世纪20 -30年代的作品也是戏剧艺术具象舞台设计的一个例子,也是在乌克兰戏剧艺术的基础上对欧洲创新趋势最富有成效的诠释。其认可的“社会现实主义”风格影响了乌克兰文化的发展;在戏剧艺术中,特别是在舞台设计中,我们观察到从舞台的艺术和形象组织逐渐转向对活动场所的现实再现。因此,梅勒、彼得里茨基和赫沃斯肯科-赫沃斯托夫在二战前后的遗产并没有以创新、非凡的阶段解决方案为特征,这是有客观原因的。D. Borovskyi是战后最早的舞台设计师之一,他在乌克兰展示了对戏剧材料的艺术和具象解释。Myron Kyprian在舞台艺术家中有着特殊的地位,他在20世纪60年代至70年代的创作作品中充满了艺术和形象的表演解决方案。我们强调,50年代至60年代的乌克兰舞台设计大体上符合社会主义现实主义风格的基本原则。舞台上的大多数艺术家使用标准的技术,但也有艺术和具象的场景解决方案,从一般的惯例中脱颖而出。艺术,尤其是戏剧艺术的解放进程已经发生了转变,并不断朝着摆脱过去决定艺术发展方式的世界观原则和美学体系的方向发展。解决舞台空间的艺术化、具象化组织的形象化问题,应遵循舞台环境的普遍性原则、思想的可塑性体现原则。20世纪末,艺术家们转向多种艺术手法,通过丰富表现手段和技术手段的调色板来体现戏剧材料的象征潜台词和哲学内容。场景系统结合各种元素,材料的视觉和塑性特征来隐喻动作。艺术家-舞台导演的主要思想的大规模、纪念性的塑料体现与舞台的空白空间共存。在二十世纪末,我们观察到艺术家——构成戏剧艺术和具象解决方案的舞台布景师与观众之间的相互丰富和精神成长,他们能够感知和关心戏剧的隐喻的象征领域——可塑性的空间坐标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ARTISTIC AND FIGURATIVE STATEMENTS IN UKRAINIAN SCENOGRAPHY OF THE XX CENTURY
The article "Artistic and figurative statements in the Ukrainian scenography of the XX century" analyzes the conditions and factors of develop- ment of the art of theater and scenography as a component during the XX century in Ukraine. The scenographic space provides an opportunity to synthesize elements of plastic arts to create an artistic and figurative solution and to form the emotional climate of a theatrical performance. During the development of the art of theater, an evolution of the scenography took place. The level of scenography in Ukraine in the 1920s and 1930s not only corresponded to the standards of the world art, but also exceeded its value orientations, provided the key to understanding artistic searches and discoveries on a global scale. Ukrainian scenographers offered independent artistic and figurative solutions of performances. In the scenography of the 1920s, O. Khvostenko-Khvostov used various means of design of space – construction, painting, fabrics, mobile machine, banner, film projection, light, photomontage, etc. A. Petritskyi even managed to give constructivism diversity and emotionality, perfectly synthesize the spatio-temporal characteristics of theatrical art, forming an artistic and figurative solution of the play. W. Meller's work in the 20s-30s of the XXth century is also an example of artistic figurative stage design of the play and the most fruitful inter- pretation of European innovative trends on the basis of Ukrainian theatrical art. The "social realism" style approved by the influenced the develop- ment of Ukrainian culture; in theatrical art and, in particular, scenography, we observe a gradual departure from the artistic and figurative organiza- tion of the stage towards realistic reproduction of the place of action. Thus, the legacy of V. Meller, A. Petritskyi and O. Khvostenko-Khvostov before and after World War II is not distinguished by innovative, ex- traordinary stage solutions, which is explained by objective reasons. D. Borovskyi was one of the first scenographers of the post – war period who demonstrated artistic and figurative interpretation of dramatic material in Ukraine. Myron Kyprian has a special place among the artists of the stage, whose creative work of the 60s – 70s of the XX century abounds in artistic and figurative solutions of performances. We emphasize that the Ukrainian scenography in the 50's – 60's generally corresponded to the basic principles of the style of socialist realism. Most artists of the stage used standard techniques, but there were also artistic and figurative scenographic solutions that stood out from the general usual practice. The process of liberation of art in general and theatrical in particular has shifted and is constantly evolving towards getting rid of the dictates of worldview principles and aesthetic systems that determined the ways of development of art in previous years. The solution of the problems of visu- alization of the artistic and figurative organization of the stage space is the principle of universalism of the stage environment, plastic embodiment of ideas. At the end of the XXth century artists turned to a variety of artistic techniques in an effort to embody the symbolic subtext and philosophi- cal content of the dramatic material by enriching the palette of expressive and technical means. The scenography system combines various ele- ments, visual and plastic characteristics of materials to metaphorize the action. The large-scale, monumental plastic embodiment of the main idea of the artist – scenographer coexists with the empty space of the stage. At the end of the twentieth century we observe the mutual enrichment and spiritual growth of artists – scenographers who form the artistic and figurative solution of the play and the audience, able to perceive and care about the metaphorical symbolic sphere of plastic – spatial coordinates of the play.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF CULTURE UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR: CULTURAL ASPECT SAVING UKRAINIAN CULTURAL HERITAGE DURING THE WAR: PRACTICES OF INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS THEME OF THE WAR IN FINE ARTS: PECULIARITY OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS MOBILE APP DESIGN FUNCTIONALITY WITH DIGITALIZED CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS OF KHARKIV CITY AND KHARKIV REGION FROM "RED" TO "NEW" CULTURE: TRADITION AND INNOVATIONS IN CHINESE MARXISM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1